Essays & reviews about the classic (mostly black and white) era of film and TV. Especially Silents, Horror, Sci-Fi, Film Noirs, Cartoons, Dada & Experimental Films. Member of the Classic Movie Blog Association (CMBA).
Tuesday, 7 November 2023
German Expressionist Film In the Nazi Era
Expressionism is the defining film genre of Weimar Germany and indeed one of the most important of the entire interwar film era. It's themes of exploring loneliness, alienation, madness, dehumanization, nightmares, hallucinations and untamed emotions and it's esthetic world of shadows, fog, pools of light and artificiality would influence future genres of horror, film noir and science fiction from Hitchcock and James Whale down to Tim Burton and Ridley Scott. Not to mention any number of rock videos. However, it's time in German film barely survived the decade and would be stamped out, as would so much art, by the coming to power of the Nazis in 1933. In fact Expressionism as a genre was already in decline by then, made passe partly by the inevitable change in tastes encouraged by the coming of sound and it's change of focus away from the purely visual and partly by the coming of the Great Depression when the public's desire was to escape from the gloom of their lives than to watch it on screen.
Nevertheless there's no doubt the nail in the coffin was the Nazis. Adolf Hitler (a failed artist) and Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels (a failed novelist) were convinced they were experts in art and music and like all Fascists the Nazis taste in art was reactionary in the extreme and like everything else was to be at the service of the state in fostering "patriotism". Fascist art celebrates hyper traditionalism with plenty of bombastic pseudo Greco-Roman and Nordic art, equally hyper masculinity (which often crosses over into unintional homoerotic self-parody which is even more hilarious since Fascists seem to be the only ones who can't spot it), militarism and absolute conformity and obedience to strongman leaders and strict social hierarchies. There is no room for or tolerance Modern Art (basically from the Impressionist Era onward) with it's themes of abstraction, self-reflection, decadence, loneliness and the inner world of dreams and the psyche. Fascism allows for no inner world at all demanding instead constant outward displays of mindless fealty. The Nazis classed virtually all Modern Art as officially "Degenerate" including the distinctly German creations of Expressionism, Dada, Cabaret and the Die Bruke movement and Bauhaus Design school as well as Surrealism, Cubism, Futurism, Fauvism and Art Nouveau which they publicised with the infamous display of "Degenerate Art" in 1937 which became something of an embarrassment as some of the art turned out to be more popular with curious audiences than the officially sanctioned art exhibit that happened at the same time.
"DEGENERATE ART" EXHIBITION
Hitler and Goebbels paid special attention to the film for it's propaganda potential. They had no doubt noticed how the Soviets had used film as a propaganda tool coining the name "Agitprop" including the films of iconic director Sergi Eisenstein such as "The Battleship Potemkin". They were also notably fans of Sherlock Holmes films, westerns, Disney cartoons and even Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" which Hitler screened several times in spite of the movie being banned. A particular favorite of both was "Gone With The Wind" as a pro-Confederate epic and were envious of Germany not really having an equivalent, which would eventually lead to an attempt to make their own historical epic in "Kolberg" (1945) considered to be possibly the biggest money losing bomb of all time.
The Nazi attitude towards German film and Expressionism was contradictory. Upon taking power in 1933 they imposed an immediate stop to most productions while they were evaluated for their value to the state and the Party with many films being banned including "All Quiet On The Western Front" (antiwar), "Tarzan & His Mate" (too erotic), "The Prize Fighter & The Lady" (starring Jewish boxer Max Baer), and even Chaplin's "The Kid" for some reason along with of course any films with obvious gay content (as I already wrote about here). Directives were swifty issued banning Jews from the industry entirely and when to their credit Dacho, the film actors and directors organization, bravely protested it was immediately disbanded. Many actors and directors spotting the writing on the wall took the chance to flee the country leading to an exodus in talent that included actors Marlane Dietrich, Peter Lorre, Conrad Veidt, Elizabeth Berenger, Oskar Homolka, John Gottwott, directors Billy Wilder, Hans Richter, Otto Preminger, Douglas Sirk, Robert Wiene and composer Kurt Weill. At first Geobeels was happy to see them go but then rather belatedly he realized the brain and talent drain would hurt the German film industry and made attempts to woo the film community. Many top Nazis including Hitler, Goebbels and Goering were shameless starfuckers both figuratively and in the case of Geobbels and Goering literally with both carrying on affairs with actresses, leading to personal appeals to certain actors and directors. Danish actress Asta Neilsen had been a major star in German film since the Great War when photos of her had been posted in the trenches by soldiers and while by 1933 she was in her fifties she was still popular enough for Goebbels and Hitler to invite her to dinner and offer her her own studio. She instead announced her retirement and returned to Denmark where she would quietly oppose the Nazis.
ASTA NIELSEN
If Asta was no longer thought of as a sex symbol that was certainly not true of Brigitte Helm of "Metropolis" fame. Helm was the very epitome of an Aryan sex symbol, tall, slim, statuesque, blonde, blue eyed and stunningly beautiful. Helm was no Nazi though, even having a Jewish banker as a boyfriend. Goebbels did have additional leverage on Helm as she also had a taste for speed known for her reckless driving which ended in a serious car crash that resulted in a death and Helm being charged with manslaughter. Hitler was a fanboy and intervened to make the charges go away and she was invited to yet another dinner with offers of film roles but she instead wasted no time in skipping to Switzerland with her Jewish boyfriend who she married and retired from film.
BRIGITTE HELM
The Polish born Pola Negri was a special case. She had been a huge star in the early twenties Germany before moving to Hollywood to further success however with the coming of sound she returned to Europe living in France and working in Germany as well. As she was Polish Goebbels hated Negri as not being insufficiently Aryan as well as difficult and refused to give her the official certificate to allow her to work in Germany but ever the Diva she simply went over his head to Hitler himself where the Fuhrer, ever the fanboy, was instantly charmed and gave her the prized certificate granting her carte blanche to continue working much to Geobbels' fury. She was not even required to make propaganda and instead focused on her beloved costume dramas until the Nazis invaded France when she quickly packed up and returned to Hollywood. Famously Fritz Lang claimed that Goebbels personally offered him the chance to be the head of the German film industry but Lang instead took the chance to flee to Hollywood. Lang was probably exaggerating his importance. As we've seen it's likely that he was offered a prominent role in German film but it's impossible to picture a micromanaging control freak like Goebbles handing control of the entire German film industry to a figure like Lang with an established reputation and obvious talent and who was not even a member of the Nazi Party. By contrast Lang's wife screenwriter Thea Harbau stayed in Germany and became a Nazi as did actors Werner Krause ("The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari"), Emil Jannings ("The Last Laugh" & "Faust"), Heinrich George, director Carl Froelich and of course Leni Riefenstal. Most seem to have kept out of politics, kept their heads down and kept their jobs such as directors GW Pabst, Herbert Selpin and Walter Ruttmann and actors Lil Dagover ("Caligari"), Erna Morena (the original "Pandora's Box" & "Diary Of A Lost Girl"), Paul Wegener ("Der Golem") and Hans Albers ("The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes"). With Wegener and Albers (and Asta Neilsen) making occasional covert gestures against the Nazis.
Quickly Goebbels would impose strict quotas on foreign films, nationalized the entire German film industry (in fact being practically the only industry the Nazis actually nationalized) and appointed a Reichsdramaturg to oversee all productions. There would end up being a series of these officials and it's telling that none of them had any legitimate film experience and were instead obscure film critics for Nazi papers and loyal party members none of whom lasted more than a few years while Goebbels himself appointed the army of censors who would rule what would be allowed. Goebbels would also famously screen at least one film a night even at the height of the war often sending notes and "suggestions" for changes to be made for his approval.
Besides being a genuine film fan Goebbels was no fool and he quickly learned much to his annoyance that overt propaganda films were simply not popular with the general public who performed the light comedies, musicals and lush costume dramas fashionable at the time so he eventually decided that such escapism had some value in distracting the public from their problems and the bulk of the films of the Nazi era would thus fall into these genres and it is estimated that less than a quarter of films produced under the Nazis were actually propaganda films. The sort of films inspired by Expressionism such as horror, film noir crime films, supernatural mysteries, sexually provocative dramas or challenging art films were another matter however. Such films might provoke people to look inward, think negative thoughts, question official conformity and think creatively, always a danger to authoritarians. Besides the Expressionist methods and tropes of elliptical and non-linear storytelling, obscure symbolism, the sympathetic portrayal of the ugly, explorations of sexuality, the mocking of authority and the rejection of logic in favour of the celebration of the world of dreams and nightmares, simply make authoritarians uncomfortable and angry for reasons they can't quite nail down.
Accordingly in German films there would be no more horror like "Nosferatu". No more master criminals like Dr Mabuse or Dr Caligari. No more dark psychological or sexually charged dramas like "Die Strasse" or the films of Asta Neilsen and Lousie Brooks. No more weird fantasies with foreign 9or worse Jewish) themes like "Der Golem". Instead film, like all art must be positive, uplifting and patriotic or at least frothy escapism. However no system is perfect even in a dictatorship and a few odd exceptions did sneak though. The classic books on German film of the Weimar years; Sigfried Kracauer's "From Caligari To Hitler" (1947) and Lotte Eisner's "The Haunted Screen" (1952) do not deal with this era at all unfortunately as is the case with most books on German film but "Film In The Third Reich" by David Stewart Hull (1969) does a thorough job although he does miss a few films. Hull does list three or four films which would fall into the category of if not strictly Expressionist than certainly Expressionist themed films that somehow managed to make it through the layer of Nazi censors. Hull's book does have some glaring omissions, possibly due to the difficulty at the time of finding copies of some films, a problem he mentions, and he largely seems to have limited himself to films he could actually view which leaves out such notable films a version of "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" (1939), "Der Schimmelreiter", an adaptation of a novel with a supernatural theme and Film Noirs "Ich War Jack Mortimer" (1935) and "The Unknown" some of which can now be seen publicly.
The first of these was "Anna Und Elisabeth" which was released in April 1933 only four months after the Hitler was appointed Chancellor and only a month after the Enabling Act was passed giving him dictatorial powers and the same month Goebbels started to take control of the film industry. Thus it was one of the last films made under the old Weimar system although released under the Nazis before the imposition of a full censorship pre-clearance system who probably would not have otherwise allowed it through with it's theme of dark and mysterious supernatural powers and a vaguely lesbian subtext with the two stars of the acclaimed overtly lesbian themed "Madchen In Uniform'' (1932).
"ANNA UND ELISABETH" (1933);
Directed by Frank Wisbar
CAST;
Hertha Thiele ~ Anna
Dorothea Wieck ~ Elisabeth Testa
Carl Bathaus ~ Martin, Anna's Brother
Mathias Wieman ~ Mathias Testa
Maria Wanck ~ Margarete, Elisabeth's Sister
Willy Kaiser-Heyl ~ The Priest
Karl Platen ~ The Doctor
Roma Bahn ~ Mary Lane
Dorothea Thiess ~ Anna's Mother
Plot Synopsis (spoiler alert); Anna is a young woman in her late teens living with her parents and brother in a small town who seems to have a faith based power to cure illness and even death by her touch as she is able to raise her brother from the dead after an unexplained illness. The town Doctor declares it a miracle but the town Priest is skeptical. Local villagers hear about the miracle and begin to gather outside the house wanting to be cured, including an old woman with a spinal neck injury. Anna is hesitant to accept her new powers but the woman takes her hand and claims that she has been cured. The Priest tells the townspeople to go home but the old woman tells them of her cure and they stay.
Elisabeth is a wealthy woman who lives with her husband Mathias and younger sister on an island outside town and who has suffered and unexplained illness or injury which has confined her to a wheelchair. She is desperate for a cure and hearing about Anna sends her husband to summon her. He is reluctant and does not believe in faith healing but he does meet with Anna. She tells him she is scared and tired and he is sympathetic but he does convince her to visit the island and meet with Elisabeth. The next moring she heads out alone in a rowboat to the island and meets with Elisabeth who begs for a cure. Anna again denies she has any powers and turns to leave. As she does, Elisabeth rises from her wheelchair and suddenly has the power to walk. The two women return to town where word has already spread and the old and sick of the town are waiting for them. Elisabeth insists that Anna come and live with her so her healing powers can be properly managed and she will be safe from the crowd and she agrees. Elisabeth keeps Anna isolated from the town and her family. Mathias and her sister try to talk Elisabeth out of the arrangement as does the Priest. Anna's brother Martin sneaks into Elisabeth's manor to talk Anna into leaving but while Anna says she is unhappy she also now believes in her powers. Elisabeth's husband visits the Priest and expresses his continued doubts. Elisabeth is visited by Mary Lane, a promoter who proposes a partnership to send them on tour to publicize Anna's gift but Elisabeth sends her away. Elizabeth meets with the Priest who tells her that the Church has heard about Anna and is sending an investigator to evaluate her. Elisabeth suggests a public demonstration at the Church. Elisabeth's husband has been ill and has been getting worse and now Elisabeth is informed that he appears to be dying. She sends for Anna to cure him. Anna comes to his bedside and prays but it is no use and he dies anyway. Both women are upset and run away separately. Back at the Church the villagers are gathering bringing their sick relatives to be cured. Elisabeth finds Anna to convince her to come to the Church but Anna refuses saying she failed to cure Mathias. Elisabeth says he died because he had no faith and Anna says she has lost her faith as well and again refuses. Despondent Elisabeth wanders off alone. Anna tells Martin she is now concerned about her. Elisabeth wanders to the edge of a cliff and Anna has a vision of her jumping off. She and Martin run to the Church for help and we are next shown Elisabeth in bed dying with Anna, Martin and the Priest present. She says that she will soon be free as will Anna as the scene fades out. Finis.
In "Madchen In Uniform" Hertha Thiele had played a teen sent to a girl's boarding school where she falls in love with one of the headmistresses played by Dorothea Wieck in a film that is widely seen as one of the finest of the Weimar's brief sound film era and is now considered a minor classic especially for it's largely sympathetic portrayal of a same sex relationship and the performances of it's two stars. The film was not only acclaimed by German critics but also in foreign countries where it was exported to rave reviews. Accordingly the reunion of the two stars was anticipated and modern film historians have noted a gay subtext in the relationship between the two women here they may be reading too much between the lines. Elisabeth's obsession and possessiveness of Anna is certainly unhealthy it appears genuine and aside from a few lingering close up shots of the two gazing inscrutably at each other it's hard to see any real sexual subtext here especially as Elisabeth is clearly in love with her devoted husband. The film's religious theme is clearly more central as Anna is seen as a sincere if conflicted believer whose power comes from prayer and is accepted as such by everybody else. When she is successful in curing people it is seen as her being a vehicle while her failure to save Mathias is blamed on his lack of faith. Interestingly the only other figure besides Mathias who doubts her powers is the town Priest with even the Doctor calling her cures miracles. The ending is ambivalent; Anna says she too has lost her faith and thus her powers yet she does have a vision of Elisabeth jumping to her death and while at the end Elisabeth is show apparently on her death bed and it's implied she is about to die she doesn't actually do so as we fade out and the fact that she has survived such a fall at all is something of a miracle. Does Anna still have her powers after all? It is unclear.
With it's religious and supernatural themes this is an oddity in German film and while not exactly Expressionist, with its themes of fantasy, the supernatural, isolation and self doubt it does show some Expressionist imagery that would become rare in the Nazi era. The town is typically Expressionist with it's crumbling houses and winding claustrophobic lanes looking like those of "Der Golem" and the various Street Films such as "Die Strasse" and "The Joyless Street" and the island that Elisabeth and Mathias live on seems like a fantasy with their grim manor surrounded by jagged trees although the manor's interiors are simple and unadorned. The film makes little use of Expressionist tropes of shadowplay with most of the action taking place during the day aside from a scene where Elisabeth, still in her wheelchair, is presented with the shadows of window blinds appearing to show her behind bars and when Elisabeth is upset or Anna has her vision of Elisabeth at the cliff's edge we get some soft focus blurriness.
The films setting of an ancient looking village and Elisabeth's mysterious island further the film's odd dreamlike atmosphere as does it's sense of being slightly out of time where most of the characters dress in contemporary clothes but there seem to be no modern devices such as phones or even electricity until the publicist Mary Lane drives up in her car and her very modern clothes and being very pushy and arrogant. It's worth noting that aside from the cynical Mary Lane the other character who has a distinctively modern look is Mathias who does not believe in miracles. In a scene where he is at the manor waiting for Anna he is shown sitting at the piano bathed in light although looking forlorn. In the end he dies but we never really learn whether Anna's powers are real or not or what will become of her or what the nature of her symbiotic relationship with Elisabeth was. Like most early sound films, director Wisbar seems unsure of what to do with music in the film and it's used sparingly aside from the typically overly melodramatic opening.
FRANK WISBAR
As this film was actually made before the Nazis took over the film industry, Goebbels imposed his film vision so it had little interference of the sort he would become notorious for. In fact it's an open question as to whether he would have even allowed the film to be made at all. The Nazis were hostile to most portrayals of the supernatural, magic and mysticism aside from their own official glorification of their supposed sacred Aryan mythological past (which Goebbels and even Hitler privately ridiculed to some degree) and the very Catholic mysticism of this film would have made them uneasy. There were other Fascist regimes (especially Franco's or Vichy France) that would have accepted the films's mystical premise but this was a poor fit for the Nazis. Despite the fame of its two leads the film was not a success with critics puzzled by it's ambivalent theme, muted tone and downbeat ending. It got an even more lackluster reception abroad. This was was actually one of the last German films to be exported as soon Geobbels would impose restrictive quotas on foreign imports aside from a few friendly countries like Italy. Predictably those countries, including America and most of Europe quickly responded with quotas of their own and along with boycotts of Nazi goods essentially collapsed the German export market for the rest of the Nazi era. Previously "Machden In Uniform" had gotten rave reviews but American critics found this film slow and muddled. Eventually Goebbels did get around to banning the film after it had already been shown and unlike "Madchen" it has been largely forgotten today although Hertha Thiele always listed it as one of her favorite roles. In their books Kracauer mentions the film only in a footnote while Eisner dimisses in in passing as "not a success".
HERTHA THIELE
The two leads would have different careers under Nazi rule and afterwards. Hertha Thiele (born 1908), being another young pretty blonde, was naturally popular with Nazi feminine ideals and like Brigitte Helm was offered big roles if she would agree to play ball with the Nazi propaganda machine but as a supporter of leftist causes she breezily refused and soon found herself sidelined and in 1937 also like Helm she moved to Switzerland. After the war she moved back and forth between Switzerland and East Germany where she found some work in theatre and TV. Late in life she was able to see her work be reconsidered by German film historians, especially for "Madchen". She died in 1984 aged 76.
Dorthea Wieck (born 1908, note that while in their films together Wieck always played the older woman they were actually the same age) was originally Swiss but moved to Germany as a child and started acting onstage and silent films in her teens. She was noted for her soulful but dignified dark eyed beauty and racked up a long list of film roles even occasionally appearing in American films. Like Asta Neilsen, Brigitte Helm and Theile she was popular with the Goebbels and Hitler but unlike them she was willing to be wooed by the new regime with her husband, a wealthy Baron, being a Nazi supporter and she continued to work easily throughout the era even being given special praise by Goebbels. After the war such an association would be enough to effectively end the careers of the likes of Leni Reifenstal, Emil Jannings and Werner Krause but Wieck seems to have convinced the West German authorities that she hadn't played any significant propaganda role for the regime and she was allowed to continue her career albeit in supporting roles into the sixties when she effectively retired. She died in 1986 aged 78.
DOROTHEA WIECK
Director Frank Wisbar would have a unique career under the Nazis. Born in 1899 but not starting his film career until 1932 meant that unlike most directors of his time he did not make any silent films although he reportedly did work as an assistant director on the aforementioned "Madchen In Uniform" and Carl Dreyer's near silent "Vampyr", His own tastes seemed to run from odd supernatural themed melodramas to frothy comedies. It was the latter films that were popular with Nazi authorities including winning an award in 1935 and although he made no overt propaganda films it was probably these films that allowed him enough freedom to make the few supernatural films released in that era including the strangely Gothic Expressionist "Farmann Maria" in 1936.
"FAHRMANN MARIA" (1936);
Directed by Frank Wisbar
CAST;
Sybille Schmitz ~ Maria
Albert Moog ~ The Refugee
Peter Voss ~ Death
Karl Platen ~ The Ferryman
Carl De Vogt ~ The Fiddler
Gerhard Bienert ~ The Wealthy Farmer
Plot synopsis (spoiler alert); Set in the late nineteenth century in a rural village which is in a moor on a river which must be crossed via a small wooden ferry run by an old ferryman, one day a mysterious man appears waiting for a ride across the river. The stranger is tall, silent and dressed all in black. He does not speak but as the he is crossing the river the Ferryman suddenly dies and the stranger returns to the other side of the river leaving the village without a ferryman. Maria, a young woman passing through in need of money agrees to take the job which requires living in a small cottage on the river bank. One night a man arrives on the opposite bank exhausted and begging to be ferried over the river saying he is being pursued. Maria ferries him across just as six men ride up dressed in black and riding white horses. Seeing the man has crossed the river they turn and ride off without a word and the man collapses and Maria hides him in her cottage. The next morning the Refugee tells her he comes from a rich farm country which is under attack from an unknown enemy he has being on the run from which she had rescued him from and now he intends to return when but he promises to return. Other men appear from the village to crudely try and seduce Maria including a wandering fiddler and a wealthy farmer but she rebufs them as she has become infatuated with the Refugee. He becomes sick and feverish and has visions of the Black Riders returning. As he sleeps and the village prepares for it's harvest festival the tall silent stranger in black returns to the far bank and waits to be ferried across. As Maria pulls him across the river he asks her if she has carried across an injured man and at first she denies it but when the Stranger turns to look in her cottage she tells him the Refugee has gone to the village. She takes the stranger to the village where the festival is in swing. All the villagers regard the Man in Black with fear. The wealthy farmer who had accosted Maria earlier assumes she and the Man In Black are on date and challenges him to shoot dice for the honour of a dance with Maria which the stranger wins. As the Man In Black searches for the refugee Maria tries to distract him by dancing with him during which she feels faint. The farmer, now jealous interrupts the dance and accuses Maria in front of the villagers of having harbouring the stranger in her cottage and she runs away. Fleeing to a church she prays for help saying he would give her life to protect the refugee but the stranger Man In Black and says her prayers are useless. Maria tries to ring the church bell to summon help but no sound comes out. She breaks down and agrees to guide him through the moor to her cottage but she leads him astray and he stumbles into the marsh and is dragged down to drown. Maria returns to the cottage where the Refugee has awakened and she agrees to go off with him. They cross the river which is revealed to be rich farmland and they walk off together. Finis.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a more explicitly Expressionist film than "Anna & Elizabeth" both in its subject matter dealing with death, nightmares and the supernatural and in it's visual themes. Much of the film is shot at night and the swamp looks appropriately eerie and dreamlike. In fact the swamp looks remarkably similar to that in FW Murnau's "Sunrise; A Song Of Two Humans" which is probably not a coincidence. The Black Riders are especially arresting visually and in turn bear a striking resemblance for modern viewers to the Black Riders of Tolkien's "The Fellowship Of The Ring" although that probably is a coincidence. The figure of Death (assuming that's who he is) resembles classic Expressionist villains such as Dr Caligari, Count Orlack and Scampinelli from "The Student Of Prague" and his death as he is wordlessly sucked into the dark mire is a striking image that resembles the death of the villian Stapleton in the classic Sherlock Holmes "Hound Of The Baskervilles" and Dreyer's "Vampyr" suffocated in white powder. The character of the old Ferryman in turn exactly resembles the Renfield character from "Nosferatu" although they are not the same actor. As Maria, Sybille Schmitz is not the typical blonde Aryan leading lady but instead with her dark hair, sharp features and brooding stare she reminds one of classic Expressionist heroines Lil Dagover ("Caligari"), Lyda Salmonava ("Der Golem" and "The Student Of Prague") and Greta Schroeder ("Nosferatu") like Schroeder's Ellen, Maria is prepared to sacrifice herself for her love and again like Ellen she defeats Death by tempting him and then leading him to his doom. Unlike Nosferatu however who lusts creepily after Ellen here Death is impassive and seems to have little actual interest in her and she succeeds not by tempting him but through trickery. In another similar trope from Expressionist films Maria is in fact the only character to have a name as the others are essentially two dimensional symbols or archetypes with only Maria having any real character development.
This is a better film than "Anna & Elisabeth" with a more coherent story and a stronger lead character. The visual themes are also better done and more consistent. Like "Vampyr" this could just as easily have been a silent film although it does make better use of music especially the menacing fanfare when Herr Death appears to Maria the first time although like other films of the era it does pad things out through musical interludes using the Fiddler character that could have been left out.
THE BLACK RIDERS
Besides the mystical themes some observers even at the time noted some veiled analogies to the Nazis in the form of Death and his Black Riders dressed in impecable black like Hitler's SS and the film is unique in the Nazi era. In fact Geobbels for his part disliked the film and considered it a failed experiment yet he still allowed it to be released partly because he was still trying to reassure the film community he would not micromanage them and possibly because he thought it might find a potential export market. In the event it found no audience either in German or abroad and was largely ignored by critics and has been all but forgotten today. Although it is sometimes referred to as the last example of pure German Expressionism it does not even rate a mention in Siegfried Kracauer or Lotte Eisner's books.
PETER VOSS AS DEATH
The same year Wisbar teamed up with Sybille Schmitz for another odd mystery film. "Die Unbekannte" (AKA "The Unknown") was based on a German novel "The Unknown Woman Of The Seine", which was in turn based on the true story of a woman whose body was fished out of the French River Seine in the 1880's. She was never identified even after her body was put on display and hundreds filed passed and her death mask was published in the papers. The mystery of her identity and the apparently serene look on her face fascinated artists in Europe in the 1890's inspiring books, paintings and sculptures. In this telling of her story the woman is named Madeline (played by Schmitz) and she is a high priced courtesan who tires of her life of parties and affairs and decides to leave Paris and falls in love with a wealthy German adventurer Thomas Bentick (played by French actor Jean Galland in a likely play for the export market) who invites her to stay at his house and and her to join him on a planned trip to Africa. However she is recognized by one of her past clients who threatens her with blackmail. Bentick is also a diplomatic agent for the German government and he is charged with a last minute secret mission forcing him to cancel his trip with Madeleine. Hearing about the cancelled trip and fearing her past will be used against her and will ruin his reputation the distraught Madeline drowns herself in the River Seine where she is found by the police who can not identify her.
This film has similar themes to the 1927 film "A Tragedy Of The Streets" starring Asta Neilsen (which I wrote about here) and could have certainly been shot in an Expressionist style however this time Wysbar chose to film the story as a straightforward romance which is rather bland as well as being overly talky and having little chemistry between the two leads. This is not an Expressionist film and has no such imagery so we need not spend more time on it. As a trivia note one of the supporting roles was played by the young Curt Jurgens who would later play the one of the most iconic Bond villains in "Goldfinger". Once again this film was not a success and hereafter Wisbar would return to the kind of frothy escapist romances that were favoured by Goebbels and the public at large for the next few years. Before the war he gave up and moved to Hollywood where he would have a long career mostly making low budget thrillers and later into television. In 1946 he made "The Strangler In The Swamp", inspired by and using some of the same imagery as "Fahrmann Maria".
"THE STRANGLER IN THE SWAMP" (1946);
The comparisons with "Fahrmann Maria" are obvious with its swamp, ferry, beautiful ferryman and mysterious stranger. But while this film is often billed as a remake of the earlier German film it is substantially different in it's story and themes entirely lacking the mysticism and mystery of the earlier film and is really a melodramatic ghost story. Instead of the enigmatic figure of Death the stranger is a vengeful ghost knocking off those who unjustly hanged him years before after framing him for murder. Since the stranger is a ghost there is no need for the Black Riders and they are completely absent, robbing the film of one of the earlier film's most memorable images. The Refugee on the run from an unknown foe is now a son returning home from the big city and there is still a Maria but while in the earlier film she was another wandering stranger her she is also a daughter returning from the city leaving a fairly conventional romance. This time she does not stand alone as there is the young man's father who sides with her and while as in the earlier film she does offer to sacrifice herself once she does so the ghost vanishes willingly rather than being lured into the swamp and drowned thus removing the earlier film's second most memorable image. This film does keep some of the visuals of the earlier film and even improves on the atmosphere of the swamp which is even more dark, foggy and eerie but the overall mood of this film is different and this is basically a romantic ghost story. Note the young man here is played by a young Blake Edwards who would later go on to become a writer and director responsible for the classic Pink Panther movies.
Sybille Schmitz would also star in another crime film which would make effective use of some themes from Expressionism and the related genre of Street Films from the Weimar era, this time directed by Carl Froelich who had produced "Madchen In Uniform".
"I WAS JACK MORTIMER" (1935);
Directed by Carl Froelich
Cast;
Anton Wohlbruck ~ Fred Spooner
Eugen Klopfer ~ Pedro Montemayor
Sybille Schmitz ~ Winifred Montemayor
Marieluise Claudius ~ Marie Polikow
Hilde Hildebrand ~ Daisy
Plot Synopsis (spoiler alert);
Fred Spooner (Wohlbruck), a struggling Budapest taxi driver, is frustrated because he wants to marry his girlfriend Marie (Polikow) who works in a restaurant with her Russian emigre family. His big break seems to come one day when he assists a beautiful and wealthy Daisy (Hildebrand) with the engine of her car and is hired by her to act as her chauffeur on a trip down to Monte Carlo on very good wages. Fred tells Marie about his new job but tries to conceal that his new boss is a beautiful woman. On the same day celebrated conductor Pedro Montemayor (Klopfer) arrives in the city for a concert, accompanied by his younger wife Winifred (Schmitz). He is jealous, possessive and arrogant and his bullying has led her into a romance with American Jack Mortimer, who is also scheduled to arrive in the city that day and stay at the same hotel. Pedro has been spying on Winifred and has become aware of the affair.
Shortly after Fred picks up Mortimer in his taxi from the station, Montemayor shoots him dead from another car, then he dashes off to appear at a concert he will be conducting that night. At first Fred does not notice his passenger is dead when he does he at first tries to go to the police, but they are preoccupied and he becomes suddenly alarmed that he will be blamed for the murder he goes to his new boss Daisy and explains what happened, she advises him to go to the police and she dismisses him. Distraught, he drives through the city before dumping the body in a pond several miles away; however he forgets the suitcase left in the cab. He returns home and tells Marie of his plight, she too advises turning himself in and telling his story to the police but he refuses and she agrees not to tell the police.
Increasingly desperate, he remembers that he still has the dead man's bags in his cab. Realizing he bears a strong resemblance to the dead man and reasoning that if the American was known to have turned up at the hotel he won't be linked with his death he changes into Mortimer's elegant clothes and goes to impersonate him at the hotel for a brief time to establish his own alibi.
Winifred has become worried about Pedro's suspicions and tries to warn Mortimer by sending him a note and trying to call him but gets no answer. As she sits in the audience at the start of Pedro's concert Daisy arrives and tells her male companion about Fred's plight and Madeline partially overhears enough to be afraid that Mortimer may be the victim and she quickly leaves to try and phone Mortimer at the hotel. Unable to raise him on the phone she rushes off to his hotel and arrives to find Fred instead of Mortimer. In the midst of his concert Pedro notices Madeline has left but must wait until after the concert before he can leave and he too rushes off to the hotel to find Madeline and Fred. In the confrontation Fred blurts out that Mortimer is dead and Pedro accuses him of the murder. Madeline faints and Fred runs away, locking Winifred and Pedro locked up together in the hotel room.
A worried Marie sets out to look for Fred who has gone to the restaurant where she works but they miss each other and he sits down to wait for her. Her father who also works at the restaurant asks where Marie is but Fred brushes him off. A fellow cabbie shows up and tells him that blood has been found in the cab and the police are looking for him. Marie's Father overhears and demands to know what fred has done to Marie and fred runs off again. Marie has returned home but seeing police arriving dashes off to warn Fred. She hides in a party where a dance is going on and Fred finds her and she convinces him to turn himself in and they return to the hotel. Meanwhile Winifred and Pedro locked up together have been talking and he confesses to her. She tells him his jealousy has destroyed their marriage and he decides to call the police and turn himself in. Fred and Marie arrive at the hotel as Pedro is confessing and fred confesses to dumping Mortimer's body and impersonating him saying "I was Jack Mortimer". Pedro is led away accompanied by Madeline and the final shot is of a poster of Pedro being papered over. Finis.
=================================================================
The film starts slowly and conventionally, shot in realistic style but once Mortimer is shot director Froelich makes use of the full arsenal of techniques from Expressionist and Street films as the cab races through darkened streets through pools of light reflecting off damp pavement. As Fred becomes more distraught his state of mind is shown through a rapid montage of blaring trumpets, close-ups of accusing faces, honking car horns and a dramatic shot of the empty cab with it's lights shining menacingly. Once Pedro notices Madeline is missing we get another montage of blaring musical instruments and a shot of Madeline's empty chair bathed in light glaring down at him. Significantly while the early part of the film was shot in daylight with regular edits and shots after the shooting most of the action is at night and sometimes obscured by shadow with faster edits and closeups to reflect the emotional states of Fred and Pedro. As Pedro, the possessive overbearing husband, Eugen Klopfer bears a strong and probably not coincidental resemblance to classic Expressionist villains played by Werner Krause, Emil Jannings and especially Paul Wegener. Unlike Frank Wisbar's films Froelich has plenty of music and makes good use of it during the scenes of Fred's cab racing through the streets and the montage of his thoughts with a tense blaring fanfare. Another clever use of sound that would not have been available in a silent film is the scene where Madeline strains to overhear as Daisy tells her date about Fred's story but is drowned out by the applause of the audience. Unlike classic Expressionist films which made use of artificial stage sets for a sense of unreality, something the two Frank Wysbar films did, this film uses realistic looking sets and street scenes which are clearly shot on location which is something it does have in common with the later Street Films like "Asphalt" (which it most closely resembles) and the sound crime film "M". Like many of the male characters in the Street Films the lead character Fred is a naive sap who is largely responsible for his own troubles through his own lying, panic and childlike short sighted stupidity (he is wrong every step of the way) and Pedro is an arrogant, jealous bully while the women; Marie, Madeline and Daisy being the only sensible ones who the men of course largely ignore.
While this film is not strictly Expressionist it makes excellent use of Expressionist techniques and is probably the best German Film Noir of the era. Goebbels disapproved of crime films in general feeling they encouraged moral relativism and such films were uncommon but once again he allowed this film through perhaps recognizing its obvious quality and once again hoping it might find an international audience in the export market he had not yet quite given up on. Another possibility in getting the film the green light might lie in director Carl Froelich. While some directors who chose to stay in Germany such as Frank Wysbar and GW Pabst who basically stayed away from controversy to keep their jobs but avoided making overt propaganda Froelich became a Nazi and willingly made propaganda films for the regime. Froelich had a respected career going back to the Great War specializing in lush historical dramas including a biopic of Wagner, Hitler's beloved opera composer. He didn't actually join the Nazi Party until 1933 suggesting he was at least motivated more by opportunism but quickly became a favoured director being given the honorific "Filmprofessor" and being appointed director of the Reichskulturkammer, a trade organization which regulated all artistic activities in the Third Reich in 1933, a title he held until the fall of the regime. After the war his activities earned him an arrest and trial at one of the Denazification tribunals although he managed to evade a jail sentence his career was essentially over and he would make only two films before his death in 1953. In his book about cinema under the Nazis David Hull notes Froelich's genuine talent but laments his willingness to serve the Nazis which has likely led to this otherwise fine Noir genre film being forgotten.
Eugen Klopfer, who plays the bullying Pedro, also became a Nazi appearing in the notorious hate film "Jud Sus" (1940) and being awarded various titles and official positions in film and theatre. The fall of the regime also earned him an arrest along with a two month prison term in 1948. He would be banned from film work although after his release he was able to return to stage productions before his death in 1950. Leading man Anton Wohlbruck was no Nazi and being both half Jewish and gay he fled to Britain in 1936 where he continued acting in film including twice playing Prince Albert in biopics of Queen Victoria and the original version of "Gaslight". He retired from film in 1958 and returned to Germany where he worked occasionally on stage and TV until his death in 1967.
SYBILLE SCHMITZ
Sybille Schmitz would become a tragic figure. Born in 1909, had began in small roles in the low budget 1928 street film "Polizei Uberfall" (which I wrote about here) and the big budget GW Pabst/Louise Brooks film "Diary Of A Lost Girl" and Dreyer's "Vampyr" (which is presumably where she met Wysbar). Besides the Wysbar films she would also appear in the usual popular big budget romances where with her non Aryan looks and moody persona she was never popular with Goebbels who was probably also wary of her scandalous personal life which included alcohol and drug abuse and numerous affairs with both sexes. While she was not considered a leading lady she still continued to find decent roles playing exotic or vaguely dangerous fallen women in unusual (in the Nazi era) films like the crime film "I Was Jack Mortimer" (1935) and the sci-fi film "Master Of The World" (1934) and the big budget "Titanic" (1943). Although she played no significant propaganda role her continued success in the Nazi era and particularly the notorious "Titanic" dogged her in the post war era and she found herself shunned and harder to find work. By now in her forties and increasingly mentally fragile she died of a drug overdose in 1955 with the suspicion that her then live-in female lover, who was also her doctor, had been draining her funds and keeping her dependent may have been responsible for her overdose. She was 45.
Marie Louise Claudius was only aged twenty two at the time she played Marie here but she had been acting since she was a teen. She would also appear in the odd and popular Sherlock Holmes reworking "The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes" (1937) but her career would be short however as she died of a sudden heart attack in 1941 aged only twenty nine and her grave would be lost in the chaos of the war and bombing. Hilde Hiledbrand at Fred's employer Daisy had appeared in the original version of "Victor/Victoria" (1933) and continued on with her career into the TV age, dying in 1976 aged 78.
Speaking of Sherlock Holmes as I mentioned in a previous article the character was always popular in Germany (Hitler himself was reportedly a fan) with adaptations going back before the Great War.The aforementioned "The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes" was more of an odd light comedy filmed in a straightforward style and mostly in daylight but the "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" with its setting of foggy moors at moonlight was a natural fit for Expressionist techniques with two silent versions directed by Richard Oswald in 1914 and 1929 with a sound version being made in 1937.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES" (1937);
Directed by Carl Lamac
Cast;
Bruno Guttner ~ Sherlock Holmes
Fritz Odemar ~ Dr Watson
Peter Voss ~ Henry Baskerville
Fritz Rasp ~ Barrymore
Erich Ponto ~ Stapleton
Alice Brandt ~ Beryl
Unlike Holmes films of the era this film actually does keep reasonably close to the original Conan Doyle story and the acting from the mostly b-level cast while non-descript is competent enough with Bruno Guttner as Holmes oddly resembling Raymond Massey who had already played Holmes. The two previous silent German Holmes films directed by Richard Oswald made some use of Expressionist techniques with some fine camera work of dark and foreboding sets at night and some fairly kinetic camera work, this film is far more conventional until the characters get to Baskerville Hall and the windswept Grimpen Mire when director Carl Lamac gets to make use of by now standard Expressionist techniques and we get some appropriately foggy and gloomy moors these scenes are perhaps inevitable given the novel's plot and setting but Lamac also does some good interior scenes at Baskerville Manor which has the appropriate shadowy rooms, stairways to nowhere and a scene where Watson questions the suspicious looking maid and she is entirely in shadow silhouette. This is otherwise a conventional Holmes film largely forgotten by most Holmesians but it is arguably the best of the early sound era pre-Basil Rathbone classic Holmes films of which there had already been several starring the likes of Clive Owen, Reginald Owen, Raymond Massey and Arthur Wotner. These films were most pretty perfunctory while this film's use of Expressionist tropes does at least have a definite sense of visual style. Director Lamac was actually a Czech who had started his career around 1918 when Czechoslovakia was still part of the Austrian Hapsburg Empire continuing after the Great War in Czechoslovakia, Austria and Germany. After Czechoslovakia was annexed by the Nazis in 1938 he fled to Britain where he served the Airforce and made war documentaries. After the war he worked in Hollywood as a cameraman and technician before returning to West Germany where he made a few more films before dying in 1952 of kidney disease.
=========================================
One of the classic Expressionist Horror films and also one of the first was "The Student Of Prague" (1913) starring Paul Wegener, best known for the even more iconic "Der Golem". These films established the basic Expressionist themes of dehumanization, isolation, madness and a nightmare world of shadows and fog and would later be remade in an even better and more artistic version in 1926 that reunited masters of Expressionist Horror acting Conrad Veidt and Werner Krause from "Caligari" (I already wrote about both films here). Perhaps inevitably there would be a sound remake in 1935. There had been a remake of the lesser known but still excellent "Alraune" (1928) with Brigette Helm of "Metropolis" fame in 1930 (both which I wrote about here) but otherwise few Expressionist Horror films would get the sound remake treatment. There would be no remake of "The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari" as it was probably considered too weird as well as being vaguely anti-authoritarian and "Nosferatu" had already been made as the American "Dracula" in 1931 while "Der Golem" was out of the question due to it's Jewish themes and setting. "The Student Of Prague" would then be the only such film to be remade in the Nazi era (aside from the partial exception of the version of "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" if that counts) and thus providing a unique chance to compare a classic Weimar silent with a Nazi era remake. This version would have some recognizable names in Anton Walbrook from "I Was Jack Mortimer" and Dorthea Wieck of "Anna Und Elisabeth" and "Madchen In Uniform" directed by Arthur Robison who had directed the 1923 Expressionist psychological film "Warning Shadows".
Rather than recapping the entire plot here I recommend reading the prior article I wrote about the earlier silent versions (which also has the actual full film of course, found here) but to cover the basics the plot revolves around Balduin, the titular student in late 19th century Prague, then part of the Austrian Hapsburg Empire. Balduin is handsome, popular and a champion fencer who has designs on Julia, an attractive & wealthy woman of higher social status played here by Dorthea Wieck. His rival for her affections is Krebs, a friend and fellow student and fencer. At the same time Lydia, a pretty serving maid (Edna Greyff) has a crush on Balduin who likes her but she is of clearly lower social status. Frustrated by his lack of money and status Baldwin is seduced by the promises of Scampinelli, a Svengali type figure who promises he can improve Balduin's prospects through shadowy magical means and Baldin accepts.Balduin than watches horrified but mesmerized as his reflection steps out of a full length mirror and comes to life. The Doppelganger seems to be a version Balduin without a soul or conscience and thus free to pursue Balduin's goals without being restrained by guilt and thus goes on spree of drunken debauchery, cheating at gambling, discarding Lydia to openly pursue Julia and ultimately killing his friend Krebs in a duel even though both had promised the duel would not be fatal. When the real Balduin discovers this he is appalled and confronted by the Doppelganger at first tries to flee but everywhere he turns the Doppelganger is there. Ultimately the Doppelganger returns to the mirror and dares Balduin to shoot him which he does shattering the mirror and his reflection but then he has a heart attack and dies. The story has obvious influences from the classic German fable of "Faust" (which would be made into a film version in 1926 directed by FW Murnau and starring Emil Jannings) along with "Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde" (also made into a now lost 1920 version again by Murnau and starring Veidt) and Oscar Wilde's "The Picture Of Dorian Grey" so it's resonance in Germany was not a surprise and may be why Goebbels gave this film the green light along the the possibility that this story was universal enough to be a potential export product, a goal he never fully gave up on until the start of WW2.
The sound version has some notable differences from the two silent versions (both of which are almost identical in their plots and characters if not film techniques) some of which are more obvious than others.
"THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE" (1935);
Directed by Arthur Robison
CAST;
Anton Wohlbruck ~ Balduin
Theodor Loos ~ Dr Carpis
Dorothea Wieck ~ Julia
Edna Greyff ~ Lydia
Karl Hellmer ~ Krebs
One clear difference was that in the original films at least some of the characters appear to be Jewish including a scene where they talk in a Jewish cemetery. This is not a major theme in the film unlike in "Der Golem" which takes place entirely in a Jewish ghetto and the villains are the Austrian Hapsburgs but clearly any Jewish characters at all would be impossible unless they were some sort of lecherous, conniving moneylender, so it's no surprise to find all such traces removed here. Since this was only incidental to the original films this has no effect on the actual story here. More noticable is the change in the character and behavior of Balduin and his Doppelganger. In the silent films the Doppelganger appears as in effect Balduin's Id (to use a Freudian term the filmmakers may or may not have been aware of), capable of carrying out his not-so-secret desires without conscience or restraint. It is the Doppelganger that cruelly discards the devoted but lowly Lydia to pursue the wealthy upper class Julia, it is he that cheats at cards and ultimately kills his friend and rival until the real Balduin, plagued by guilt, rids himself of the interloper and thus destroys himself. This time Balduin himself carries out these acts (sometimes egged on by Scampinelli, especially during the duel) while the Doppelganger seems to be his conscience appearing to haunt him and remind him of his sins until Balduin destroys both. In the silent versions Balduin is horrified by the actions of in what is effect his own dark side which has committed crimes in his name and finally confronts him while in the sound version Balduin is instead appalled by what is in effect his own conscience reminding him of his own sins and it is that he destroys.
BALDUIN & CARPIS
I don't know if this subtle but real change in focus was intentional or what exactly it says about attitudes in Nazi mythology. In the silent versions Balduin is essentially a passive figure after making the deal with Scampinelli and it is the Doppelganger that commits the crimes which he only later becomes aware of and is horrified by. Unlike Faust who is fully aware of who the Devil is, Balduin does not even fully realize the deal he has made and is thus even less responsible for its ramifications. In the sound remake Balduin himself takes all actions and the Doppelganger appears as his conscience to plague him who he then confronts. Notably in while in silent versions the Doppelganger can and does interact with the real world characters, including killing Balduin's former friend in a duel, here the Doppelganger does not and does not appear to even be visible to anyone other than Balduin and Carpis. Both the silent and sound Balduins end up destroying himself but in doing so the silent versions at least perhaps regain their soul while if the sound version had been prepared to shake of his conscience (which never does more than basically nag him) as so many other Germans did under the Nazis, he would could have simply walked away without real consequences. In death the silent Balduins are also somewhat relieved to have vanquished their dark sides, sound Balduin gets no such release, he dies lamenting his lost innocence but having accomplished nothing.
The character of Scampinelli is also subtly different. In the silent versions he is a clear Mephisto character as in Faust with obvious powers both supernatural (including at one point controlling the weather) and Satanic while the sound version's powers are less overt. Here (remaned Dr Carpis) he is more of a scheming Svengali with some more subtle magical powers who manipulates through lies and temptation. Although the Nazis encouraged a lot of traditional turgid German pseudo-mystical blood & soil Aryan mythological claptrap at the same time Goebbels, and to a certain extent Hitler, were suspicious of and uncomfortable with overt supernatural themes in general and Christian themed ones in particular as distracting from the Nazi personality cult which had to be to a certain extent secular if it were to claim to speak for all Germans while excluding non Germans even if they be Christian. Which led to some cognitive dissonance in Nazi propaganda with the likes of SS leader Himmler spending millions of marks digging up ancient artifacts and party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg writing ponderous books to prove the Aryan's supposed timeless and mystical roots while behind closed doors Goebbels, Goering and sometimes even Hitler sneeringly dismissing Himmler's finds as "dirty shards of pottery" and Rosenberg's books as unreadable drivel. Downgrading Carpis from the divine Mephisto is well within the German Expressionist tradition anyway. Such spider-like manipulative villains were not uncommon in Expressionist films starting with Dr Caligari and continuing to the mad scientists in "Metropolis" and "Alraune" and the master gangster Dr Mabuse and having that character appearing to be a scheming foreigner was certainly acceptable to Nazi sentiment without even needing any supernatural powers. Note that in what was almost certainly a "suggestion" from Goebbels the character's name was changed from Scampinelli, an Italian name since Italy was now Germany's most important ally, to Carpis, often a Jewish name although the character is not explicitly so.
Setting aside the film's themes the addition of sound allowed for and indeed encouraged departures from Expressionist techniques as this film is of course much more talky and thus slower moving than the silent versions. The addition of sound allows the film to do something common in early talkies, add in plenty of music. Here the character of Julia is not a wealthy upper-class heiress but a successful opera singer this allows for her to sing two songs along with a few other numbers which also slow the film down and detract from the claustrophobic atmosphere so essential to Expressionism. Changing Julia from a noblewoman to a singer also changes what she represents from the old aristocracy always viewed by the Nazis with jealousy and suspicion to the kind of celebrities created by the star system they actively encouraged. In fact unlike most of the earlier films we have surveyed here which used music sparingly this film uses lush melodramatic and romantic background music through out with the same soaring strings and blaring horns as in any similar conventional Hollywood which further distances the viewer from the sort of immersive dream world of Expressionism. Whereas the silent versions are horror films this film is more firmly in the already popular and mainstream of historical romances already popular in Germany and prefered by Geobbels and Hitler albeit one apparently set in the Twilight Zone.
BALDWIN & JULIA
Another difference is in the sets which, while up to the high standards of UFA, are realistic and lack the claustrophobic artificiality of the 1926 version. This difference is particularly noticeable in the scenes at the end as Balduin attempts to flee through the city streets at night. The darkened streets here are shadowy enough but lack the menace of the 1926 Expressionist streets and are as pretty as the rest of the film. (Note that these are still clearly artificial sets as at one point Balduin leans against a wall and it can be seen to buckle being likely a painted canvas). The acting is similarly conventional with Anton Walbrook doing a perfectly solid job as Balduin (he is in practically every scene) but he clearly does not compare to the deep emotional turmoil of Conrad Veidt or even Paul Wegener in the silent versions. Similarly the Carpis character here as played by Theodor Loos is different from the character as played by Werner Krause and John Gottowt in being merely maliciously cold and arrogant but lacking their supernatural creepiness. Dorothea Wieck is typically fine in a more conventional role than in "Anna & Elisabeth" or "Madchen In Uniform" but there is another difference in the character of Lydia played here by Edna Greyff. In the silent versions the character once dumped by Balduin takes revenge and it is in fact she who sets up the duel by setting Krebs against Balduin but here she does no such thing and is a completely passive figure mooning loyally but ineffectually over Balduin until the end as befits a proper maiden in Nazi mythology. It's fitting that while in the silent versions she was played by dark haired and exotic actresses this time she is played by the properly blonde and open faced Greyff.
DOROTHEA WIECK
What Goebbels' attitude towards the film was is unknown, but it got poor reviews and was not a success. In his book David Stewart Hull mentions it only in passing but it's worth noting that there would be no further Expressionist remakes under the Nazis. This would also be Arthur Robison's last film as he died suddenly that year. Comparing the silent and sound versions of "The Student Of Prague" show how Expressionism was probably never going to survive the sound era even without the ideological interference of the Nazi censors. Audiences would certainly be happy to accept some Expressionist techniques in an appropriate story as was shown in the most successful films seen here; "Hound Of The Baskervilles", "I Was Jack Mortimer" and "The Student Of Prague" but they also wanted the sort of frothy escapist tropes that would undermine the essential Expressionist nightmare world namely in using a lot of music, lush and essentially realistic sets and costumes and a fair amount of expositional dialogue that removes the mysteries of the earlier era. It is generally acknowledged that Expressionism would leave a heavy influence in Hollywood in the genres of Film Noir and later Sci-Fi and there's no reason to doubt that such an evolution would have happened in German films as well if left to their own devices, in fact the three films just mentioned are perfectly solid genre films with "I Was Jack Mortimer" even being a fine Film Noir and "The Student Of Prague" having the makings of a decent psychological thriller if it had leaned more into it's supernatural themes while "Farman Maria" is clearly superior to the American remake even while having the same director although one suspects non-German audiences would have found it's very European mysticism even more baffling than Germans did and would have prefered the cheesiness of the American version.
Ultimately the very qualities that defined Expressionism as a theory; it's explorations of loneliness and alienation, sexual frustration, temptation and unconvention, the world of nightmares and dreams, and the examination of the darkness of the soul, which many film and cultural historians such as Sigfried Kracauer, Lotte Eisner and Peter Gay have cited as precursors to and warnings of Fascism, were also incompatible with the esthetics of Fascism with it's celebration of conformity and complete surrender of free will to a strongman. Expressionism even with all its darkness which some see as self defeating passivity still allowed for some qualities Fascism will alway see as a threat to its core; unconventionality, guilt and self-reflection. Expressionism was not seen as deeply threatening as Dada, Germany's other great Weimar art and film movement which the Nazis truly hated and did not even try to appropriate, but it turned out to require the messiness of democracy to flourish and eventually it would do so when it made its way to the very non-German and non-European world of Hollywood.
SYBILLE SCHMITZ
Monday, 25 September 2023
Back To School Special; Educational Silent Films
"What a man does not see...He will not learn. (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
Overshadowed by their flashier, more artistically ambitious sisters of comedies, horror, romances, epics and serials the modest genre of Educational Films are rarely if ever given any notice but they are actually an important window on the Silent Era as well being among the most durable.
Much of the first generation of film in the 1890's had been made up of simply pointing a camera at some real life situation or location with the genre being refered to as "Actualities". However the intention of these films was not to educate people and they were instead relying on the sheer novelty of people actually seeing moving images of a moving train or the skyline of New York or even someone just feeding the pigeons. There was no attempt to add any context or tell a story. The heyday of Actualities only lasted a few years before the novelty wore off and films with proper narratives in the modern style (albeit it as one reel shorts) had taken over. Eventually educators started to realize that film could be used as a medium not just to entertain but to educate and short films started being made with the specific goal of educating the masses on a variety of subjects. The 1910's was a time of Progressives and Reformers busy in all sorts of areas from health to education to urban reform and a belief that science and technology carried endless posibilities for the future. Educators were eager to make use of the new medium and with small 16mm film projectors available and being cheap and easy to use school boards at least in larger cities were making use of them. A 1913 statement by the Federal Dept of Education (which had been created in 1867) released a report which said "The institutions were nearly unanimously in favor of teaching through cinemotography and the prediction was made by most of them that the day was close at hand when they would all consider the cinematograph projector and film as an indespensible part of their equipment". The report stated that at this point this was more true of colleges, universities, trade schools and highschools but expansion into elementary schools was seen in the not too distant future. Seperate from this trend religious organizations were also looking at films for their schools and missionaries with as early as 1911 seeing a pamphlet urging their use entitiled "The Religious Possibilities Of The Motion Picture" (Herbert Atchison Jump) even as other religious leaders were still condemming films as a worldy tool of decadance.
By the time of the Great War there already were detailed published works advocating for the use of film as an educational tool including "Motion Picture Education" (Ernest Alfred Dench, 1917), "Visual Instruction Through Lantern Slides & Motion Picture Films" (William Richard Duffey, 1918), "Education By Visualization" (1918, published by Pathescope Pictures, subtitled "Education Without Effort"), "Film, It's Use In Popular Education" (Wrigley Jackson, 1922), "Motion Pictures For Instruction" (Andrew Phillip Hollis, 1926), and by 1921 there was a monthly trade guide called "The Educational Screen" billed as "The Independent Magazine Devoted To The New Influence In National Education" and the "Blue Book Of Audio Visual Materials" both listing hundreds of films available from dozens of studios ranging from major studios like Pathe, Fox and Famous Players to large specialty studios like Bray Pictures and DeVry to smaller and largely anonymous studios with equally anodine names like Neighborhood Pictures or Service Studios.
By 1915 there was enough interest to generate a more sober pamphlet produced by the Visual Education Association Of California co-signed by the Presidents of dozens of major universities entitled "Our Visual Education Problem" which saw the potential of film but criticized the lack of standards as well as waste and inefficiency (they were also concerned about there being a fire hazard with reportedly the entire film stock held by the New York Dept of Education being destroyed in a 1911 fire) and called for a "motion picture apparatus" in every state to distribute films to every school selected by the state Board Of Education thus ensuring more low income and rural schools wouldn't be left behind.
In fact just how widespread film use was outside the cities is questionable as until FDR's New Deal programs of rural electrification in the 1930's, the majority of schools in rural America remained as the same one-room school houses that had existed since pioneer days without electric power and in some areas like Appalachia, the Ozarks, Newfoundland Outports, the Far North and the Black South this would still be true into the 1960's.
Besides being used in schools the target audiences went beyond and some weren't meant for schools at all. While most of these films were indeed sold to schools, universities and libraries some were also sold to various community groups and clubs which held a larger and more important role in society than they do in our more atomized post TV and internet era. Groups like the Rotarians, Elk's Lodges, women's clubs, travel and sports clubs, unions, reform clubs, ethnic and foreign language clubs, Boy and Girl Scouts, YMCA, WCTU, 4_H Clubs, Farm Grange groups and church groups would hold movie or educational nights for their members while some large corporations like Ford and Goodyear financed films that showed the greatness of their products and workforces.
Besides these groups some of these films were actually shown to the theatre going public being worthy of being added as opening attractions to matinee or weekend bills usually because their subject matter and photography was likely to be interesting to the wider public, this is especially true of travel and nature films. Other films made specifically by corporations could advertise not only their products but the larger social beneficence of their rule. There were also films that were used to show how to use a new device (notably the telephone) and even those designed to give short lectures on American history or civics lessons on subjects the role of citizens might be added to the bill in areas with a heavy immigrant population. The studios and distributers were aware of this and sometimes bundled together different unrelated shorts (usually comedies) on the same reels with the above mentioned "Our Visual Education Problem" giving the example that a short entitled "President Taft And His Cabinet in Washington" was released with a Katzenjammer Kids slapstick comedy tacked on to the end and warning schools to be able to edit out such distractions which were obvioulsy added for a theatre doing an afternoon matinee.
These films, aside from those that might be added to a public theatre bill, were marketed differently than Hollywood films, even those that were made by Hollywood studios. Instead of being sold or sent out as part of a studios weekly releases they were sold through mail order catalogs that were distributed to various school boards, universities, libraries and the like. Ironically this was similar to the the first generation of films (and records) in the 1900's which could be sold through the Sears and Roebuck catalogs. By the 1920's this practice for the general public was mostly limited to travel and nature films and at the other end of the spectrum stag and "party" films. Religious and films had their own mail order networks as well as did ethnic films including Yiddish and Chinese films.
While made on a low budget, these films were usually professionally done sometimes by major studios like Pathe and Fox as well as large studios that specialized in the genre. Some of these studios like Bray, Jam Handy and DeVry would become successful business that would continue for years while others were more fly-by-night with generic names like Neighborhood Pictures would release a few films before shutting up shop perhaps to sell their stock or reopen under a different name. The anonymous nature of these films meant that few if any had any screen credits and the actual filmmakers were completely unknown then and will certainly remain that way so we have no way of knowing how many Hollywood filmmakers, editors, cameramen, intertitle writers, technicians and even minor actors got their start or moonlighted in educational films but we do know a few names.
One of the most important was Bray Studios which would also show that the supposedly low key and wholesome world of educational tunes could be every bit as cut-throat and ruthless as the Hollywood studio magnets. Bray was founded by John Bray in 1912 and would make a name for itself as a producer of early cartoons employing some later famous animators like the Fleischer Bros, Walter Lanz ("Woody Woodpecker") and Paul Terry ("Terrytunes"). John Bray himself had been an early animator and was heavily influenced by the brilliant pioneer animator Winsor McCay and his groundbreaking shorts of the 1910's like "Gertie The Dinosaur" with McCay himself teaching him some of his methods only to have Bray go behind his back and try to patent them (which McCay had at first generously chosen not to do being happy to encourage other cartoonists) and then had the nerve to sue McCay for violating the patents on his own inventions! McCay would end up winning those suits but it set a pattern of Bray's hard driving, not to mention greedy business attitudes. Besides cartoons Bray also tried his hand at making comedy shorts and branched out into the lower profile but lucrative genre of educational, promotional and industrial films including for clients like the auto industry and the US Army. Bray would spend less time on animation to focus on running the business including cutting a deal with Sam Goldwyn in 1920 which gained Bray Studios more money and major distribution but also a heavier workload which along with Bray's penny-pinching would lead his best animators, the Fleischers, Lantz and Terry to leave and found their own studios. Bray's lucrative ad contracts including those for the automotive industry were managed by producer and former Olympic swimmer Jam Handy who would eventually leave as well in the 1930's to start his own studios as well taking most of his clients. Bray began to drift away from his comedy and cartoon business by the end of the twenties but the educational division would continue on into the 1960's as Brayco which had also marketed a model of small film projector suitable for classrooms. He lived to see some of his films shown at MOMA and died in 1978 aged 99. Jam Handy was a former Olympic medal winning swimmer (at the 1924 games) who got a job in newspaper marketing with the Chicago Tribune before moving into producing industrial films and educational films for the Army during World War One which led to teaming up with Bray who put him in charge of the educational division while Bray focused on his comedy and cartoon ambitions. By the end of the twenties Handy left Bray for his own Jam Handy Organization which would become a major producer in the 30's and 40's. Besides about 7,000 educational and industrial films Handy produced some animated films including the first version of "Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer" directed by Max Fleischer. Handy died in 1983 aged 97 as the oldest American Olympic Medalist.
Charles Urban had started out in the early days of film Actualities in Britain. An American who started out as an agent for a book publisher and managing a stationary store in Ohio and Michigan as early as 1895 he spotted the potential of film and moved to Britain in 1897 and started his own Charles Urban Trading Company as one of the first film producers in the UK specializing in educational, travel, advertising and sports films and making some war films during the Great War and some full length films. Besides the hundreds of documentaries he also dabbled in non fiction including an early science fiction films "The Airship Destroyer" (1909) and "The Aerial Submarine" (1910). He also did among the first colour film releases. After the war he returned to America and tried to establish his company however he overextended himself and by 1924 his businesses had failed and he returned to Britain but was unable to rebuild his fortunes. Even the outbreak of a new war found no role for the old man and he died and died in 1942 aged 75 already forgotten.
"ON THE BANKS OF THE ZUYTER ZEE" (Fragment, date unknown directed by Charles Urban)
DeVry School Films were another major producer of educational films in the twenties, a look at 1926 guide book for educators listing films available for schools and libraries from numerous companies (including US government departments) has dozens of films from DeVry on various subjects. Founder Herman DeVry was a German immigrant and an inventor and friend of fellow inventor the notorious Lee Deforest who claimed to have invented radio and television (he did not). Besides being one of the pioneers of educational films and later went on to found the well known DeVry Universities as a chain of private technical colleges across the country which still exist. He died in 1941.
The subjects of these films covered a range of topics with the most popular including nature and travel films to vistas both and home and abroad for an audience most of whom at this time still had never travelled far from home unless they were immigrants or WW1 vets and even then probably only once. Other common subjects were science and technology including promoting or explain how to use new electrical appliances, phones, cars, typewriters, cash registers etc in an era of constant innovation. There were basic history lessons about Presidents and explorers and the like and civics and citizenship lessons as well as hygiene lessons. A specific genre were films about space and the planets which I already wrote about here.
One of the ironies of these films is that even though they had no artistic pretentions or dreams of longevity these films are among the best preserved of the silent era. This is due to a few factors. Unlike feature films which were rented out to exhibitors and returned weeks later, educational films were sold to exhibitors and schools who stored them away to be used for years and in fact most of these titles were still in use well into the 1960's. By contrast when Hollywood studios were done showing a film they would (hopefully) place a few copies in storage and melt down the rest for their silver content. Even those films stored away might not last long as studios went bankrupt or merged and the risks of damage from moisture, and the ever present danger of fires could destroy hundreds of films in a day. Thus while such important figures as Teda Bara, Alla Nazimova, Florence LaBadie or John Bunny have only a surviving few films each we have dozens of films from John Bray, Jam Handy or DeVry and they can give an unique view of life in the silent era and while most were shot quickly in a very bland and straightforward manner occasionally some geniune artistic flair could be seen.
================================================
TRAVEL FILMS;
One always popular subject was travel films of various suitably exotic lands. Even before the advent of films travelling lectures using lantern slides were a popular form of entertainment with the middle class and almost as soon as cameras became portable enough to be lugged on the back of a mule or strapped into a canoe crews went out to bring the world to a public who had mostly never travelled to another continent and had previously had to make do with travel books with their grainy photos and lithographs. Jungle safaris and forest were a particularly enticing draw. Here we have some examples of each.
"SUMATRA, LAND OF YESTERDAY" (date unknown);
This film was made by the Goodyear Tire Company showing local natives as well as footage of the Goodyear rubber plantations and factories. The native footage does include some decent footage of dances and a theatrical musical show of some sort presented in a way that is not especially patronizing and the natives are shown in a non threatening way and there is also some quick shots of a volcano however there is no doubt that the purpose of the film is to show how the American corporation has brought civilization and improvement to their lives. At one point the use of a bulldozer is greeted with an intertitle saying it "brought an element of civilization to this desolate place" with similar praise for a steamroller however to (most) modern eyes it's the resulting barren landscape, denuded of trees that looks desolate. The intertitles also happily state that the "coolies" now have soap reinforcing a typical colonial belief that brown skinned foreigners are inherently dirty. The factory is praised as "clean and modern" although to modern eyes it looks rather gloomy. Another intertitle literally praises "The untiring efforts of the Goodyear Organization to render a still greater service to civilization" and a rice crop as "evidence of civilization's gradual conquest of this distant island" which nicely sums up the colonial attitude. Note that the use of the term "Coolies" while now seen as racist was at the time simply a generic term for any Asian laborer. As an odd note Sumatra was at the time a Dutch colony but there is no mention of that at all and one could get the impression that it was actually an American territory if not a Goodyear one.
"THE BATAK OF SUMATRA" (1928);
By contrast with the Goodyear film this one was made by Pathe Pictures in conjunction with Harvard University as part of a series "Peoples Of The World" and instead of corporate propaganda it attempts to be a more educational view of the people of Sumatra. It includes more information including maps and some background info as well as more and better location footage. No plantations or factories this time or patronizing peons of bringing civilization. Unlike the first film this one takes an actual interest in the people however superficially. Notably that while the first film seems to imply the Europeans brought rice cultivation to Sumatra this film does not. Both films show in their music and dances, always a popular part of any presentation of tribal peoples. Once again we get a volcano to close things off. Note that this is the area where the notorious Krakatoa eruption had taken place in 1888 and was still remembered. Once again that this is a Dutch colony is not mentioned.
Between these two films the Pathe/Harvard one is clearly the better educational tool (if superficial) while the Goodyear one is both corporate and colonial propaganda. The former could easily be used in a school setting while the latter is more of a promotional tool that Goodyear was no doubt happy to have shown to the general public. The cinematography in both films is about the same with the Pathe film spending more time on the native dwellings. The Goodyear film does have more attractive intertitle cards.
"JUNGLES OF THE AMAZON" (1928);
Made by Fox, this travelogue heads to the Amazon via the Andes in Ecuador in a safari type manner and is more interested in the landscape than the people who we are reminded are headhunters and possibly dangerous. Unlike the goodyear Sumatra film there is little portrayal of European "civilizing" aside from a brief shot of a city the party and film crew sets off from and a mention of Pizzaro's conquest. The natives are clearly in need of such civilization though as they are explicitly named as violent, lawless and "warring constantly over their one treasure, women" and otherwise "scratching out a bare and monotonous existence" and described as following gods that are "bloodthirsty" and "ruthless". Although the actual natives we see seem perfectly friendly and more bedraggled than threatening. One of the oddities of this film is that even though it's entitled "Jungles Of The Amazon" we don't actually see any jungles! Instead we spend our time in the Andes Mountains and the headwaters of the Amazon. Due to it's short length it's possible and even likely this film was part of a series that continued on with the party down the river and into the actual jungles. In spite of the obvious scenic possibilities of the Andes the photography here is nothing special. This film is too short and shallow to be of much educational value and provides more of a brief taste of exotic titillation which would be acceptable enough as an opener in a theatre matinee which is probably where it was more widely seen than in a school setting.
"THE HEART OF ELDORADO" (circa 1926 or 27);
This is a fragment with the date and studio being unknown. What remains are some beautiful shots of idylic mountain rivers and lakes. Rather than being shot at the El Dorado River in Alaska this film was actually shot on the Maruia River in New Zealand, popular with fisherman including famed American Western writer Zane Grey who wrote a book about the place in 1926 which he referred to as the "Angler's Eldorado" so it's likely this film came as a result of this book which would explain the title. It's also entirely possible the man we see sitting admiringly at the lakes edge is Zane Grey himself as he does resemble him. This film is more of a tourism booster than an educational film at least what little is left. It's also unknown if this film was made by an American company or a New Zealand one. As a tiny and isolated country New Zealand had little domestic film industry and like Canada the government did set up a state-owned studio as the National Film Unit (NFU) to make documentaries and promotional films but that was not until 1936 however it's still possible this was a domestic production aimed at the US market. Besides being a fragment this print is rather also rather distressed which only adds to it's dreamlike quality today.
"ABOVE THE CLOUDS IN RAINIER NATIONAL PARK" (date or dates unknown);
While exotic locales like distant jungles and mountains full of colourful natives were popular subjects the mass production of the automobile was ushering in a new age in long distance vacations for the middle class and there were still plenty of wild places nearby to visit. This film goes to Mt Rainier in Washington State and this time we get some appropriate shots of the mountains looking suitably majestic high above a sea of fluffy clouds and raging rivers. With no colourful natives to show we instead focus on the journey with shots of mountain climbing and paddling canoes through rapids. About halfway through suddenly and without warning or explanation we are hundreds of miles away in Banff National Park in Canada and the gorgeous Banff Springs Hotel (still open BTW) with it's imperial grandeur and we're taking a ride above it on a cable car to Sugar Loaf Mountain and Twin Falls. Then just as suddenly we end up at Takakkaw Falls which are in a different National Park in British Columbia. There is plenty of fine photography here but the abrupt switch from three different locations in two separate countries without explanation suggests this film was actually edited together from two or three different mountain travel films slapped together with the title frame from the Mt Rainier being kept in place. The fact that there are noticeably different styles of font used in the intertitles throughout also suggests this. It's even probable that these films were originally made by entirely different studios. This points out one of the problems with these films in that once they had been purchased distributors were free to edit them as they pleased as I also noted in my previous about the space documentaries which reused some of the same footage from each other. This has some nice scenery but without any context it has no educational value.
"BC LUMBER" (date unknown);
Canada offered a different kind of exotica. Largely still seen as a wilderness full of vast forests, rugged mountains, rivers and frozen tundra with plenty of colourful natives and French lumberjacks and trappers but properly ruled over by Anglo white men and the iconic Mounties, Canada was just different enough to be foreign but similar and close enough to be safely so. As with Sumatra we have two different films with the first being an official promotional film put out by the Canadian government to showcase the timber industry in British Columbia. We see plenty of detailed and gorgeous sequences of chopping down massive Redwood trees, floating them down the river and sending them to the sawmill.
This is a well made film with some fine photography, the intertitles are attractive and clear and the whole thing is coherent. While it's obviously propaganda it at least avoids the patronizing tone of the Goodyear Sumatra film or the Amazon film partly because it doesn't display any colonial attitudes towards native people thanks to not mentioning them at all. Of course it also doesn't display any concern for the environmental impact of all that clearcutting although to be fair at this point only a few isolated voices were starting to consider this. Indeed unlike most films of the Canadian wild we get scenes of wildlife at all. Almost from the start of the film era there some of the biggest film stars had been Canadian including Mary Pickford, Florence Lawrence, Florence LaBadie, Mack Sennett and producer Sam Goldwyn but the actual domestic film industry had been tiny and known mostly for independent filmmakers like Nell Shipman with Canada being too small, still largely rural and geographically spread out to support a large studio. However the Canadian government had started a film bureau as early as 1918 to make promotional and educational films and the ones that promoted industries and tourism and immigration were marketed to US and foreign screens so these films were usually well made as here if a little generic. This film could be shown in both a classroom and as part of an theatrical opening feature to promote both Canadian timber and tourism.
"CANADA, LAND OF THE MOOSE" (1927);
This film was made by Fox and unlike the rather dry (if attractive) lumber film shows the work of a filmmaker with some background in narrative film as we open with shots of an American city (presumably New York) with its urban noise and clatter then we quickly shift to an unknown part of Canada where we are "Far from the crowd - contentment!". We get the usual scenes of canoeing down the river rapids, over an impressive beaver dam (I've seen beaver dams and they are usually smaller) and through a bullrush clogged pond before making camp and making dinner ("Flapjacks, pike and coffee"" we are helpfully told) next to an open fire. We have already seen similar scenes in the Amazon film but here they are presented much more vividly and we get a real sense of physicality with straining muscles pushing through the rapids and better photography of the stunning landscape. Halfway through we get to the moose and we spend the rest of the film seeing shots of these impressive animals. Fortunately our voyagers didn't shoot any, although the larger target audience for this film would have been American tourists who wished to hunt them. This well made film could easily do double as an educational tool as well as to promote tourism.
"FELLING FOREST GIANTS" (date unknown);
Another from Pathe as part of a series that is more about forestry industry propaganda than about nature. Unlike the Canadian film this one actually does concede that the rate that trees are being denuded is not sustainable but assures us that the situation is under control. In spite of having no doubt experienced crew from Pathe the footage here is not nearly as attractive as the Canadian film however and is focused on the process of cutting and transport rather than the forest itself which we see little of. We close off with a log rolling competition, something notably lacking in the Canadian film.
"TREES" (date unknown);
This film was produced by Castle Films, which means it's possible they didn't actually make the film but bought it from another producer or edited it together entirely or partly from other sources. Regardless it does have both a specific narrative message and uses scenes recreated with actors for a more filmatic style. The film quotes Joyce Kilmer who wrote the poem but oddly leaves out the most famous line; "I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a tree". It goes on to point out that Kilmer died in the Great War and shows some realistic footage that was probably repurposed from another film. Then we take an inexplicable side trip to prehistoric times with considerably less plausible scenes of primitive man using trees for shelter which looks like they could have been repurposed from Buster Keaton's "The Three Ages". All this is to display the importance of trees to civilization and then we fast forward to today where we see a modern wood house and various wooden products which include sailing ships and the invention of paper in China before moving on to the by now standard scenes of logging and a pulp and paper mill. At this point we're only two minutes in and we've already covered a few hundred thousand years of mankind. Next we get tributes to the importance of paper and facts and figures about tree production before shifting gears once again to a lecture on preventing forest fires including some fire footage. The film takes care to note that the main cause of fires isn't industry but careless citizens like you. This is an odd film with wild switches in timeline and a rambling narrative starting off with the standard praise of the industry that probably funded it and ending in a public safety lecture which was probably a selling point to market to educators. It's a little too earnest in its eagerness to pump up its importance with its references to poems, cavemen and ancient China (all in under twelve minutes) but it was probably perfect to show to Boy Scout troops and 4H clubs. One odd note is for a film that is supposed to be a tribute to trees there are no good shots of trees in the film itself, especially compared to the Canadian films and in fact the photography in general is pedestrian. Note the distributor listed as Wholesome Film Service on the title card but this was clearly added much later, probably in the 1940's or 50's and they would have simply bought the rights to distribute and as always it's also possible they made edits and changes to the film although the intertitles do remain constant throughout.
================================================
NATURE FILMS;
Nature and animal films could include some wildlife scenes along with footage of microscopic creatures that had never been seen before by the general public which could make these usually otherwise dry science and biology lessons of interest to non-students if they were photographed and presented in a creative manner.
"A DAY AT THE RIVER" (1928);
This time the river we visit is the rushing white water rapids of our previous films but instead an idyllic fishing hole complete with a Huckleberry Finn type character before we get to the main attraction which is detailed footage of various fish and crayfish and even some shots of microscopic larvae and eggs. This sort of footage was a new technique never seen before by laymen who were probably suitably impressed. This was an age of scientific discoveries and new technologies and even the general public took an interest. There is the barest trace of a narrative structure with the use of a framing device with our Huck Finn going to and leaving the fishing hole at the end. This film was made by DeVry Studios who specialized in educational films exclusively but it could have been more widely shown.
"DOWN AT THE POND" (1926);
This film dispenses with any sort of framing device aside from a quick glance of the pond before getting to the point of more close up footage of frogs and tadpoles. Some of this footage is quite striking and has a surreal quality of an alien world and must have seemed so to audiences at the time. In fact twenty years later as the age of Sci Fi films began footage like this would be used to show aliens, dinosaurs or creatures of the deep in many B Movies. This film is listed as a production of Neighborhood Films, a minor player but it also credits as having been edited by "Pathe, Bray, Wythe and other libraries" including Urban-Kineto, Searchlight and another whose logo I can't make out. With a generic name like Neighborhood I can find few other details about the company but they do have a few other films listed in the educational films catalogue including a space film I covered in my article about 1920's space docs a few years ago. They seem to have been more of a distributor than a studio that shot their own footage but instead edited together footage from other films.
"ANTS; NATURE'S CRAFTSMAN" (date unknown);
One of a series from Pathe it's a few minutes longer than usual and thus too long to be added to a theatrical bill and is purely a stolid classroom tool. We get the usual close ups of the ants as well as plenty of explanatory intertitles which also occasionally personalize them somewhat. What we don't get however is a good view of the interior of the anthill which is odd since the concept of Ant Farms must have been known by then. This film lacks any of the slightly cinematic touches of some of the other films although it does take a somewhat morbid interest in the ants' more violent tendencies.
"BEES & SPIDERS" (date unknown);
This is similar to "Ants" but it has a slightly breezy style including introducing the bees at the start as if they were cast members. This is really a fragment as the title card is missing as is the ending so we don't know what the full version included and the title is a guess. We also don't know who made it although it's evidently not from Pathe. Once again this one is purely for school use.
"DEVELOPMENT OF A SALAMANDER" (date unknown);
Made for Yale University this one about the life cycle of a salamander from egg to adult delivers what it promises but is quite dry and of would be of no interest other than purely educational but some of the photography is rather striking and probably looked otherworldly at the time.
"MANY WINGS" (1927);
This one from one of the smaller independents is has a more lyrical than educational theme consisting mostly of random shots of sea birds without any real context. The shots are pretty and restful but have little to no educational value and even though the studio is named Educational Pictures this is more of a gentle art film. The studio's slogan as "The Spice Of The Program" suggests that this film at least would be just as happy as one of the opening reels of a matinee.
=================================================
SCIENCE FILMS;
The 20's was a time of groundbreaking scientific discoveries in a number of fields that even the general public were aware of even if they didn't necessarily understand them or their larger significance so a few of these films might have been of some interest to the public if they were presented in a visually striking or entertaining manner.
"THE STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH; VOLCANOS" (1923);
Made by Pathe in conjunction with Harvard University with a combination of footage of eruptions and shots of various volcanoes both active and dormant (including Mount Rainier which we visited earlier) and animated cross sections. Some of the volcano footage includes aerial shots which was still a fairly new technology, the animation if rather crude however. We close off with some dramatic shots of slow moving lava destroying a village which must have left quite an impression on contemporary viewers.
"AIR; A LESSON IN GENERAL SCIENCE" (1928);
Another from DeVry this one uses some dramatic footage of rushing rivers and a ship being buffeted by gale force winds but the really spectacular shots are some animated footage of a tornado which actually looked real at first blowing through a town in slow motion as a menacing dark cloud. Later it becomes clear that it was animated but it's still well done, we also get some other more obvious animated footage. After that the film gets more matter-of-fact but does still have some well shot footage. Oddly this film isn't really about the air itself but more about wind air currents and air pressure and it does seem to ramble off topic at times but it does have some shots of early air travel including planes in flight and some even more striking parachute jumps and some undersea footage which was still difficult to shoot.
"THE STORY OF ASBESTOS" (1922);
Filmed by the US Department Of The Interior for the Johns-Manville Mining Company this is another corporate propaganda film masquerading as an educational film. Besides being twice as long as usual it's not especially noteworthy as a film being a straightforward presentation of the mining and production of asbestos done with no particular flair. However the film does take on a horrifying aspect in retrospect as we now know that asbestos is highly carcinogenic something the film has no clue of. In one of the first intertitles we are assured that the mineral can be handled as easily as "wool or cotton" and throughout we see people casually doing just that with nobody wearing masks or even gloves. Wecan assume that literally all these people later died of cancer or any number of other respiratory diseases. Speaking of historical hindsight, although this is an American film, we spend most of it in Canada where we also see footage of the dreary town of Asbestos, Quebec, the mining town that grew up outside the world's largest asbestos mine. Over twenty years later the town became the center of a prolonged and violent strike as Johns-Manville backed by the conservative Union Nationale Quebec government tried to bust the union who among other issues were becoming concerned with the health issues of asbestos dust. One of the results of which was the start of the career of young lawyer Pierre Trudeau who arrived to advise the union (including telling them they had a right to use violence to defend themselves from strikebreakers) along with other figures who would become the leaders of modern Quebec and Canada in future leaders of the Liberals and Parti Quebecois including union leader Jean Marchand and journalists Gerrald Peltier, Pierre Laporte and Rene Lesvesque who would later defeat the Union Nationale in what is considered one of the watershed elections in Quebec and Canadian history. By 2011 the dangers of asbestos were well known and synthetic alternatives existed and the last mine was shut down. The town still exists looking pretty much as it does here however to escape it's stigma and appeal to a new economic base of hunters and fishermen the town changed it's name to the more scenic Val-Des-Sources in 2020.
================================================
HEALTH;
Speaking of asbestos, a specific type of educational film explained how the body worked and advocated for public health issues. Accordingly some of the latter films were intended to also be shown to the general public.
"SUNSHINE; A ROMANCE" (1929);
Made by Rothacker Productions, who I've never heard of, this film differs from other such films in that instead of using a dry presentation of facts it is instead presented as a docudrama to give it's message of the health benefits of getting plenty of sunshine. This was a common theme in the Victorian Era and the early twentieth centuries when urban reformers worried about the gloominess of the asphalt jungle and the urchins who grew up there and worked in dingy factories or mines. The story involves a young married couple (who are expecting) living in the big city being visited by their older aunt and uncle from the country who are appalled to discover a distinct lack of sunlight. The women take a drive in the country so the Aunt can show the benefits of rural living while the men go to some sort of laboratory so a scientist can explain how sunshine leads the growth in plants and then dinosaurs and cavemen using some diagrams, footage borrowed from "The Lost World" and actual footage of children with rickets. Besides sunlight the scientist also advocates eating yeast which is sold in little foil wrapped cubes and can be used in cooking or eaten raw like a piece of cheese which is not something that ever caught on. The film does not mention that one can get vitamin d from not yeast foods like milk and cheese and it's likely the was financed by a yeast farming lobby group. The film is a little strident (at one point it seems to imply we were better off before clothes were invented, a message the implications of which they probably didn't think through) and overly preachy about the benefits of country life and eating yeast. The young couple also seem pretty dense with the wife bandly stating that everytime her plants die she just throws them out and buys new ones to the horror of the Aunt. The film does have a coherent story and the young couple are nice enough but this is much longer than it needed to be.
"GENERAL HEALTH" (1928);
Made by DeVry, this film covers much of the ground as the "Sunshine" film minus the yeastiness. It also contrasts the unhealthy city with the wholesome country although its urban footage looks much gloomier and is clearly genuine footage of tenements while the farm is shown as a rustic sun dappled idyll complete with Huckleberry Finn type heading off to the fishing hole. On the other hand it also shows a more barren Dustbowl type farm as unhealthy and lacking in clean drinking water. This film is stronger for its use of actual footage and dispensing with the attempts at a story and lectures from scientists in white coats thus it's also much shorter although it's obvious some if it is missing.
"SWAT THE FLY" (date unknown);
This one from a smaller studio warns against the dangers posed by possible disease carrying flies and calls for preventative measures. It has some fine closeup shots, some rather more gross shots of maggots on food and a spectaular view of the multi-lensed fly's eye view of the world. After footage of the dastardly fly we get closeup footage of our noble friends in this battle; the spider, the wasp and the bat. This one was made with the general public in mind.
"HOW WE BREATHE" (early 20's);
Bray Studios with their animation dept were well suited to these type of films with their stable of animators who would later go on to found their own studios including the Fleischer Brothers (who would go to create the iconic Betty Boop, Popeye and Superman toons), Walter Lanz (who would create Woody Woodpecker), Paul Terry (founder of Terrytoons, home of Mighty Mouse, Deputy Dawg and Heckle & Jeckle) and Vernon Stallings (who created the Krazy Kat toons and later worked in Disney features). Here we have two typical examples from Bray Studios.Unlike other films here this one is almost entirely animated and can show microscopic images no conteporary technology could have. The tile is self explanatory and there is attempt to tell any narrative with information being shown in a dry way however the animation, while basic and with little actual movement is well illustrated enough to explain it's points clearly.
"HOW WE HEAR"(early 20's);
The animation in this one is similar but the animation has more movement and has some almost surreal imagry that would not be out of place in one of the Dada short films made around the sme time by Geramn director Hans Richter.
"MAN" (1928);
Although credited as being from DeVry this is clearly from Bray Studios and has some of the same animation as :How We Hear" and "How We Breathe" showing how footage could be reused and also distributors like DeVry could just buy the rights from another studio and resell them, perhaps after making some changes and edits. We get some animation of ameobas before using some of the other footage to show how the body works.
===================================================
TECHNOLOGY;
Another category of educational film that was meant as much for the general public if not more so were films made explaining new types of technology. The 20's witnessed a dizzying array of toys that were either new inventions or that had perhaps been around for a few years but were only now being sold to the public in a big way ranging from automobiles to airplanes, from gramophones to radios, from typewriters to telephones to the even more futuristic x-ray machines. For some these new technologies were exciting while to others they were worrisome but all were eager to marvel at how they worked.
"HOW TO USE A DIAL PHONE" (1927);
Telephones had been around for over twenty years in more or less general use but these phones had required an operator to connect the call. By the end of the 20's there was a new invention that would enable people to make person to person calls. This film was commissioned specifically for the Bell Company for Fresno, California (presumably the same films went out to other cities) and gives detailed instructions for how to use the new dial phone as well as the new phone book. This one has some charming cartoon animation that is different from the more detailed animation of Bray Studios and it would be interesting to find out who did it. Given that there's a whole generation who have never used either a dial phone or phone book this one is now sort of helpful.
"HOW THE TELEPHONE TALKS" (date unknown);
Another effort from Bray Studios with their trademark mix of finely detailed animation and occasional live action shots. This one delivers exactly what it promises and explains how a phone works not as in the technology but specifically how it processes spoken and audio sound and as such would go along with the other Bray Studios film about how the ear works.
"SOUND WAVES" date unknown);
This Bray film continues on in a similar vein showing how sound, although using less animation, in favour of the sort of experiments that could be replicated in a classroom. This film is somewhat shorter than usual but it may have been cut off.
"COMMUNICATION" (1928);
Another by DeVry, this film also gives a lecture about how sound works that is not only the same as the Bray Studios films "How We Hear" and "How The Telephone Talks" it even recycles the same footage including the instantly recognizable surrealist animation along with some stock footage. As I noted in my earlier essay about the Space Documentaries taking footage from other films, even those from other studios, and editing it into new films without giving credit was not unusual but it was not usually this blatant and also not usually done by a company like DeVry which had it's own studios.
"THE HOME ELECTRICAL" (1915);
This early effort was produced by General Electric as a promotional tool to extoll the future of the all-electric home (plus a car) and simply involves a young couple escorting a guest through their home and showing off their state-of-the-art toys which include a vacuum cleaner, sewing machine, razor, iron, washing machine, soldering gun and various kitchen appliances. Some of these are less practical than others with the "electric lighted cigars" never quite catching on. Note that the audience for this would be the new prosperous middle-class like the couple shown here who live in a large and spacious house with a maid.
"THE WONDER OF X-RAYS" (date unknown);
While most of these films are either American or Canadian (with the possible exception of the one about New Zealand) this Dutch film shows the use of x-ray machine which had been around for a little while but were now more commonly being used for lesser ailments including dental x-rays as shown here at the start. By this time it was now known that x-rays were dangerous and required special heavy gloves and screens which the film also shows which probably made the whole x-ray experience seem even more terrifying and dehumanizing to the viewers.
"PRINCIPLES OF ELECTROMAGNETISM" (1927);
This film from DeVry is highly technical and beyond the grasp or interest of the average viewer relying entirely on shots and diagrams with blocks of text with the animated imagery seeming to be done in Bray's style. Originally released in two parts and put together it does drag on a bit although some of the animated diagrams have some flair. It's worth noting that this film is credited as being "Distributed by DeVry" rather than produced by them with the producers being listed as a Carpenter-Goldman Production. Frank Lyle Carpenter was a former architect who like so many others got his start with Bray Studios (where his cousin worked) as early as 1918 and later went on to found his own studio under the name Carpenter-Goldman Laboratories where he would work with the Fleischer Brothers and Paul Terry and with his own most notable toon being a B&W version of "Goldilocks & The Three Bears" in the early thirties and a stop action short about how telephones work. He later went to work with Jam Handy in the thirties where he continued specializing in animation and stop action animation for corporate clients into the 1960's when he retired.
"FINDING HIS VOICE" (1929);
One of the best known films Frank Carpenter and the Fleischers produced together was "Finding His Voice" (1929) about how talking films worked using cartoon characters.
"HOW ANIMATED CARTOONS ARE MADE" (1919);
We close off with a short from Bray Studios showing how the animation process worked hosted in live action footage by Wallace Carlson. Although youthful looking Carlson was about twenty-five here he was actually already a veteran cartoonist having produced his own shorts as early as 1914 starting out as a newspaper cartoonist (as had fellow pioneer Winsor McCay) and is considered one of the pioneers of animation. He was quickly hired by Essanay Studios where he created a number of now forgotten but successful characters as Joe, the Gumps and Dreamy Dud, a Dennis The Menace type who we see here. By 1917 he moved to Bray Studios and continued on until 1921 when he suddenly quit animation altogether, apparently tired of the grind of producing animated strips which he mocks here. He returned to doing newspaper comic strips with one one of these, "The Nebbs" being successful enough to lead to a radio serial in the 1940's after which he retired and his daughter took over the strip for many years. He died in 1967. This film appears to feature Bray as himself.
JOHN BRAY
Overshadowed by their flashier, more artistically ambitious sisters of comedies, horror, romances, epics and serials the modest genre of Educational Films are rarely if ever given any notice but they are actually an important window on the Silent Era as well being among the most durable.
Much of the first generation of film in the 1890's had been made up of simply pointing a camera at some real life situation or location with the genre being refered to as "Actualities". However the intention of these films was not to educate people and they were instead relying on the sheer novelty of people actually seeing moving images of a moving train or the skyline of New York or even someone just feeding the pigeons. There was no attempt to add any context or tell a story. The heyday of Actualities only lasted a few years before the novelty wore off and films with proper narratives in the modern style (albeit it as one reel shorts) had taken over. Eventually educators started to realize that film could be used as a medium not just to entertain but to educate and short films started being made with the specific goal of educating the masses on a variety of subjects. The 1910's was a time of Progressives and Reformers busy in all sorts of areas from health to education to urban reform and a belief that science and technology carried endless posibilities for the future. Educators were eager to make use of the new medium and with small 16mm film projectors available and being cheap and easy to use school boards at least in larger cities were making use of them. A 1913 statement by the Federal Dept of Education (which had been created in 1867) released a report which said "The institutions were nearly unanimously in favor of teaching through cinemotography and the prediction was made by most of them that the day was close at hand when they would all consider the cinematograph projector and film as an indespensible part of their equipment". The report stated that at this point this was more true of colleges, universities, trade schools and highschools but expansion into elementary schools was seen in the not too distant future. Seperate from this trend religious organizations were also looking at films for their schools and missionaries with as early as 1911 seeing a pamphlet urging their use entitiled "The Religious Possibilities Of The Motion Picture" (Herbert Atchison Jump) even as other religious leaders were still condemming films as a worldy tool of decadance.
By the time of the Great War there already were detailed published works advocating for the use of film as an educational tool including "Motion Picture Education" (Ernest Alfred Dench, 1917), "Visual Instruction Through Lantern Slides & Motion Picture Films" (William Richard Duffey, 1918), "Education By Visualization" (1918, published by Pathescope Pictures, subtitled "Education Without Effort"), "Film, It's Use In Popular Education" (Wrigley Jackson, 1922), "Motion Pictures For Instruction" (Andrew Phillip Hollis, 1926), and by 1921 there was a monthly trade guide called "The Educational Screen" billed as "The Independent Magazine Devoted To The New Influence In National Education" and the "Blue Book Of Audio Visual Materials" both listing hundreds of films available from dozens of studios ranging from major studios like Pathe, Fox and Famous Players to large specialty studios like Bray Pictures and DeVry to smaller and largely anonymous studios with equally anodine names like Neighborhood Pictures or Service Studios.
By 1915 there was enough interest to generate a more sober pamphlet produced by the Visual Education Association Of California co-signed by the Presidents of dozens of major universities entitled "Our Visual Education Problem" which saw the potential of film but criticized the lack of standards as well as waste and inefficiency (they were also concerned about there being a fire hazard with reportedly the entire film stock held by the New York Dept of Education being destroyed in a 1911 fire) and called for a "motion picture apparatus" in every state to distribute films to every school selected by the state Board Of Education thus ensuring more low income and rural schools wouldn't be left behind.
In fact just how widespread film use was outside the cities is questionable as until FDR's New Deal programs of rural electrification in the 1930's, the majority of schools in rural America remained as the same one-room school houses that had existed since pioneer days without electric power and in some areas like Appalachia, the Ozarks, Newfoundland Outports, the Far North and the Black South this would still be true into the 1960's.
Besides being used in schools the target audiences went beyond and some weren't meant for schools at all. While most of these films were indeed sold to schools, universities and libraries some were also sold to various community groups and clubs which held a larger and more important role in society than they do in our more atomized post TV and internet era. Groups like the Rotarians, Elk's Lodges, women's clubs, travel and sports clubs, unions, reform clubs, ethnic and foreign language clubs, Boy and Girl Scouts, YMCA, WCTU, 4_H Clubs, Farm Grange groups and church groups would hold movie or educational nights for their members while some large corporations like Ford and Goodyear financed films that showed the greatness of their products and workforces.
Besides these groups some of these films were actually shown to the theatre going public being worthy of being added as opening attractions to matinee or weekend bills usually because their subject matter and photography was likely to be interesting to the wider public, this is especially true of travel and nature films. Other films made specifically by corporations could advertise not only their products but the larger social beneficence of their rule. There were also films that were used to show how to use a new device (notably the telephone) and even those designed to give short lectures on American history or civics lessons on subjects the role of citizens might be added to the bill in areas with a heavy immigrant population. The studios and distributers were aware of this and sometimes bundled together different unrelated shorts (usually comedies) on the same reels with the above mentioned "Our Visual Education Problem" giving the example that a short entitled "President Taft And His Cabinet in Washington" was released with a Katzenjammer Kids slapstick comedy tacked on to the end and warning schools to be able to edit out such distractions which were obvioulsy added for a theatre doing an afternoon matinee.
These films, aside from those that might be added to a public theatre bill, were marketed differently than Hollywood films, even those that were made by Hollywood studios. Instead of being sold or sent out as part of a studios weekly releases they were sold through mail order catalogs that were distributed to various school boards, universities, libraries and the like. Ironically this was similar to the the first generation of films (and records) in the 1900's which could be sold through the Sears and Roebuck catalogs. By the 1920's this practice for the general public was mostly limited to travel and nature films and at the other end of the spectrum stag and "party" films. Religious and films had their own mail order networks as well as did ethnic films including Yiddish and Chinese films.
While made on a low budget, these films were usually professionally done sometimes by major studios like Pathe and Fox as well as large studios that specialized in the genre. Some of these studios like Bray, Jam Handy and DeVry would become successful business that would continue for years while others were more fly-by-night with generic names like Neighborhood Pictures would release a few films before shutting up shop perhaps to sell their stock or reopen under a different name. The anonymous nature of these films meant that few if any had any screen credits and the actual filmmakers were completely unknown then and will certainly remain that way so we have no way of knowing how many Hollywood filmmakers, editors, cameramen, intertitle writers, technicians and even minor actors got their start or moonlighted in educational films but we do know a few names.
One of the most important was Bray Studios which would also show that the supposedly low key and wholesome world of educational tunes could be every bit as cut-throat and ruthless as the Hollywood studio magnets. Bray was founded by John Bray in 1912 and would make a name for itself as a producer of early cartoons employing some later famous animators like the Fleischer Bros, Walter Lanz ("Woody Woodpecker") and Paul Terry ("Terrytunes"). John Bray himself had been an early animator and was heavily influenced by the brilliant pioneer animator Winsor McCay and his groundbreaking shorts of the 1910's like "Gertie The Dinosaur" with McCay himself teaching him some of his methods only to have Bray go behind his back and try to patent them (which McCay had at first generously chosen not to do being happy to encourage other cartoonists) and then had the nerve to sue McCay for violating the patents on his own inventions! McCay would end up winning those suits but it set a pattern of Bray's hard driving, not to mention greedy business attitudes. Besides cartoons Bray also tried his hand at making comedy shorts and branched out into the lower profile but lucrative genre of educational, promotional and industrial films including for clients like the auto industry and the US Army. Bray would spend less time on animation to focus on running the business including cutting a deal with Sam Goldwyn in 1920 which gained Bray Studios more money and major distribution but also a heavier workload which along with Bray's penny-pinching would lead his best animators, the Fleischers, Lantz and Terry to leave and found their own studios. Bray's lucrative ad contracts including those for the automotive industry were managed by producer and former Olympic swimmer Jam Handy who would eventually leave as well in the 1930's to start his own studios as well taking most of his clients. Bray began to drift away from his comedy and cartoon business by the end of the twenties but the educational division would continue on into the 1960's as Brayco which had also marketed a model of small film projector suitable for classrooms. He lived to see some of his films shown at MOMA and died in 1978 aged 99. Jam Handy was a former Olympic medal winning swimmer (at the 1924 games) who got a job in newspaper marketing with the Chicago Tribune before moving into producing industrial films and educational films for the Army during World War One which led to teaming up with Bray who put him in charge of the educational division while Bray focused on his comedy and cartoon ambitions. By the end of the twenties Handy left Bray for his own Jam Handy Organization which would become a major producer in the 30's and 40's. Besides about 7,000 educational and industrial films Handy produced some animated films including the first version of "Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer" directed by Max Fleischer. Handy died in 1983 aged 97 as the oldest American Olympic Medalist.
Charles Urban had started out in the early days of film Actualities in Britain. An American who started out as an agent for a book publisher and managing a stationary store in Ohio and Michigan as early as 1895 he spotted the potential of film and moved to Britain in 1897 and started his own Charles Urban Trading Company as one of the first film producers in the UK specializing in educational, travel, advertising and sports films and making some war films during the Great War and some full length films. Besides the hundreds of documentaries he also dabbled in non fiction including an early science fiction films "The Airship Destroyer" (1909) and "The Aerial Submarine" (1910). He also did among the first colour film releases. After the war he returned to America and tried to establish his company however he overextended himself and by 1924 his businesses had failed and he returned to Britain but was unable to rebuild his fortunes. Even the outbreak of a new war found no role for the old man and he died and died in 1942 aged 75 already forgotten.
"ON THE BANKS OF THE ZUYTER ZEE" (Fragment, date unknown directed by Charles Urban)
DeVry School Films were another major producer of educational films in the twenties, a look at 1926 guide book for educators listing films available for schools and libraries from numerous companies (including US government departments) has dozens of films from DeVry on various subjects. Founder Herman DeVry was a German immigrant and an inventor and friend of fellow inventor the notorious Lee Deforest who claimed to have invented radio and television (he did not). Besides being one of the pioneers of educational films and later went on to found the well known DeVry Universities as a chain of private technical colleges across the country which still exist. He died in 1941.
The subjects of these films covered a range of topics with the most popular including nature and travel films to vistas both and home and abroad for an audience most of whom at this time still had never travelled far from home unless they were immigrants or WW1 vets and even then probably only once. Other common subjects were science and technology including promoting or explain how to use new electrical appliances, phones, cars, typewriters, cash registers etc in an era of constant innovation. There were basic history lessons about Presidents and explorers and the like and civics and citizenship lessons as well as hygiene lessons. A specific genre were films about space and the planets which I already wrote about here.
One of the ironies of these films is that even though they had no artistic pretentions or dreams of longevity these films are among the best preserved of the silent era. This is due to a few factors. Unlike feature films which were rented out to exhibitors and returned weeks later, educational films were sold to exhibitors and schools who stored them away to be used for years and in fact most of these titles were still in use well into the 1960's. By contrast when Hollywood studios were done showing a film they would (hopefully) place a few copies in storage and melt down the rest for their silver content. Even those films stored away might not last long as studios went bankrupt or merged and the risks of damage from moisture, and the ever present danger of fires could destroy hundreds of films in a day. Thus while such important figures as Teda Bara, Alla Nazimova, Florence LaBadie or John Bunny have only a surviving few films each we have dozens of films from John Bray, Jam Handy or DeVry and they can give an unique view of life in the silent era and while most were shot quickly in a very bland and straightforward manner occasionally some geniune artistic flair could be seen.
================================================
TRAVEL FILMS;
One always popular subject was travel films of various suitably exotic lands. Even before the advent of films travelling lectures using lantern slides were a popular form of entertainment with the middle class and almost as soon as cameras became portable enough to be lugged on the back of a mule or strapped into a canoe crews went out to bring the world to a public who had mostly never travelled to another continent and had previously had to make do with travel books with their grainy photos and lithographs. Jungle safaris and forest were a particularly enticing draw. Here we have some examples of each.
"SUMATRA, LAND OF YESTERDAY" (date unknown);
This film was made by the Goodyear Tire Company showing local natives as well as footage of the Goodyear rubber plantations and factories. The native footage does include some decent footage of dances and a theatrical musical show of some sort presented in a way that is not especially patronizing and the natives are shown in a non threatening way and there is also some quick shots of a volcano however there is no doubt that the purpose of the film is to show how the American corporation has brought civilization and improvement to their lives. At one point the use of a bulldozer is greeted with an intertitle saying it "brought an element of civilization to this desolate place" with similar praise for a steamroller however to (most) modern eyes it's the resulting barren landscape, denuded of trees that looks desolate. The intertitles also happily state that the "coolies" now have soap reinforcing a typical colonial belief that brown skinned foreigners are inherently dirty. The factory is praised as "clean and modern" although to modern eyes it looks rather gloomy. Another intertitle literally praises "The untiring efforts of the Goodyear Organization to render a still greater service to civilization" and a rice crop as "evidence of civilization's gradual conquest of this distant island" which nicely sums up the colonial attitude. Note that the use of the term "Coolies" while now seen as racist was at the time simply a generic term for any Asian laborer. As an odd note Sumatra was at the time a Dutch colony but there is no mention of that at all and one could get the impression that it was actually an American territory if not a Goodyear one.
"THE BATAK OF SUMATRA" (1928);
By contrast with the Goodyear film this one was made by Pathe Pictures in conjunction with Harvard University as part of a series "Peoples Of The World" and instead of corporate propaganda it attempts to be a more educational view of the people of Sumatra. It includes more information including maps and some background info as well as more and better location footage. No plantations or factories this time or patronizing peons of bringing civilization. Unlike the first film this one takes an actual interest in the people however superficially. Notably that while the first film seems to imply the Europeans brought rice cultivation to Sumatra this film does not. Both films show in their music and dances, always a popular part of any presentation of tribal peoples. Once again we get a volcano to close things off. Note that this is the area where the notorious Krakatoa eruption had taken place in 1888 and was still remembered. Once again that this is a Dutch colony is not mentioned.
Between these two films the Pathe/Harvard one is clearly the better educational tool (if superficial) while the Goodyear one is both corporate and colonial propaganda. The former could easily be used in a school setting while the latter is more of a promotional tool that Goodyear was no doubt happy to have shown to the general public. The cinematography in both films is about the same with the Pathe film spending more time on the native dwellings. The Goodyear film does have more attractive intertitle cards.
"JUNGLES OF THE AMAZON" (1928);
Made by Fox, this travelogue heads to the Amazon via the Andes in Ecuador in a safari type manner and is more interested in the landscape than the people who we are reminded are headhunters and possibly dangerous. Unlike the goodyear Sumatra film there is little portrayal of European "civilizing" aside from a brief shot of a city the party and film crew sets off from and a mention of Pizzaro's conquest. The natives are clearly in need of such civilization though as they are explicitly named as violent, lawless and "warring constantly over their one treasure, women" and otherwise "scratching out a bare and monotonous existence" and described as following gods that are "bloodthirsty" and "ruthless". Although the actual natives we see seem perfectly friendly and more bedraggled than threatening. One of the oddities of this film is that even though it's entitled "Jungles Of The Amazon" we don't actually see any jungles! Instead we spend our time in the Andes Mountains and the headwaters of the Amazon. Due to it's short length it's possible and even likely this film was part of a series that continued on with the party down the river and into the actual jungles. In spite of the obvious scenic possibilities of the Andes the photography here is nothing special. This film is too short and shallow to be of much educational value and provides more of a brief taste of exotic titillation which would be acceptable enough as an opener in a theatre matinee which is probably where it was more widely seen than in a school setting.
"THE HEART OF ELDORADO" (circa 1926 or 27);
This is a fragment with the date and studio being unknown. What remains are some beautiful shots of idylic mountain rivers and lakes. Rather than being shot at the El Dorado River in Alaska this film was actually shot on the Maruia River in New Zealand, popular with fisherman including famed American Western writer Zane Grey who wrote a book about the place in 1926 which he referred to as the "Angler's Eldorado" so it's likely this film came as a result of this book which would explain the title. It's also entirely possible the man we see sitting admiringly at the lakes edge is Zane Grey himself as he does resemble him. This film is more of a tourism booster than an educational film at least what little is left. It's also unknown if this film was made by an American company or a New Zealand one. As a tiny and isolated country New Zealand had little domestic film industry and like Canada the government did set up a state-owned studio as the National Film Unit (NFU) to make documentaries and promotional films but that was not until 1936 however it's still possible this was a domestic production aimed at the US market. Besides being a fragment this print is rather also rather distressed which only adds to it's dreamlike quality today.
"ABOVE THE CLOUDS IN RAINIER NATIONAL PARK" (date or dates unknown);
While exotic locales like distant jungles and mountains full of colourful natives were popular subjects the mass production of the automobile was ushering in a new age in long distance vacations for the middle class and there were still plenty of wild places nearby to visit. This film goes to Mt Rainier in Washington State and this time we get some appropriate shots of the mountains looking suitably majestic high above a sea of fluffy clouds and raging rivers. With no colourful natives to show we instead focus on the journey with shots of mountain climbing and paddling canoes through rapids. About halfway through suddenly and without warning or explanation we are hundreds of miles away in Banff National Park in Canada and the gorgeous Banff Springs Hotel (still open BTW) with it's imperial grandeur and we're taking a ride above it on a cable car to Sugar Loaf Mountain and Twin Falls. Then just as suddenly we end up at Takakkaw Falls which are in a different National Park in British Columbia. There is plenty of fine photography here but the abrupt switch from three different locations in two separate countries without explanation suggests this film was actually edited together from two or three different mountain travel films slapped together with the title frame from the Mt Rainier being kept in place. The fact that there are noticeably different styles of font used in the intertitles throughout also suggests this. It's even probable that these films were originally made by entirely different studios. This points out one of the problems with these films in that once they had been purchased distributors were free to edit them as they pleased as I also noted in my previous about the space documentaries which reused some of the same footage from each other. This has some nice scenery but without any context it has no educational value.
"BC LUMBER" (date unknown);
Canada offered a different kind of exotica. Largely still seen as a wilderness full of vast forests, rugged mountains, rivers and frozen tundra with plenty of colourful natives and French lumberjacks and trappers but properly ruled over by Anglo white men and the iconic Mounties, Canada was just different enough to be foreign but similar and close enough to be safely so. As with Sumatra we have two different films with the first being an official promotional film put out by the Canadian government to showcase the timber industry in British Columbia. We see plenty of detailed and gorgeous sequences of chopping down massive Redwood trees, floating them down the river and sending them to the sawmill.
This is a well made film with some fine photography, the intertitles are attractive and clear and the whole thing is coherent. While it's obviously propaganda it at least avoids the patronizing tone of the Goodyear Sumatra film or the Amazon film partly because it doesn't display any colonial attitudes towards native people thanks to not mentioning them at all. Of course it also doesn't display any concern for the environmental impact of all that clearcutting although to be fair at this point only a few isolated voices were starting to consider this. Indeed unlike most films of the Canadian wild we get scenes of wildlife at all. Almost from the start of the film era there some of the biggest film stars had been Canadian including Mary Pickford, Florence Lawrence, Florence LaBadie, Mack Sennett and producer Sam Goldwyn but the actual domestic film industry had been tiny and known mostly for independent filmmakers like Nell Shipman with Canada being too small, still largely rural and geographically spread out to support a large studio. However the Canadian government had started a film bureau as early as 1918 to make promotional and educational films and the ones that promoted industries and tourism and immigration were marketed to US and foreign screens so these films were usually well made as here if a little generic. This film could be shown in both a classroom and as part of an theatrical opening feature to promote both Canadian timber and tourism.
"CANADA, LAND OF THE MOOSE" (1927);
This film was made by Fox and unlike the rather dry (if attractive) lumber film shows the work of a filmmaker with some background in narrative film as we open with shots of an American city (presumably New York) with its urban noise and clatter then we quickly shift to an unknown part of Canada where we are "Far from the crowd - contentment!". We get the usual scenes of canoeing down the river rapids, over an impressive beaver dam (I've seen beaver dams and they are usually smaller) and through a bullrush clogged pond before making camp and making dinner ("Flapjacks, pike and coffee"" we are helpfully told) next to an open fire. We have already seen similar scenes in the Amazon film but here they are presented much more vividly and we get a real sense of physicality with straining muscles pushing through the rapids and better photography of the stunning landscape. Halfway through we get to the moose and we spend the rest of the film seeing shots of these impressive animals. Fortunately our voyagers didn't shoot any, although the larger target audience for this film would have been American tourists who wished to hunt them. This well made film could easily do double as an educational tool as well as to promote tourism.
"FELLING FOREST GIANTS" (date unknown);
Another from Pathe as part of a series that is more about forestry industry propaganda than about nature. Unlike the Canadian film this one actually does concede that the rate that trees are being denuded is not sustainable but assures us that the situation is under control. In spite of having no doubt experienced crew from Pathe the footage here is not nearly as attractive as the Canadian film however and is focused on the process of cutting and transport rather than the forest itself which we see little of. We close off with a log rolling competition, something notably lacking in the Canadian film.
"TREES" (date unknown);
This film was produced by Castle Films, which means it's possible they didn't actually make the film but bought it from another producer or edited it together entirely or partly from other sources. Regardless it does have both a specific narrative message and uses scenes recreated with actors for a more filmatic style. The film quotes Joyce Kilmer who wrote the poem but oddly leaves out the most famous line; "I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a tree". It goes on to point out that Kilmer died in the Great War and shows some realistic footage that was probably repurposed from another film. Then we take an inexplicable side trip to prehistoric times with considerably less plausible scenes of primitive man using trees for shelter which looks like they could have been repurposed from Buster Keaton's "The Three Ages". All this is to display the importance of trees to civilization and then we fast forward to today where we see a modern wood house and various wooden products which include sailing ships and the invention of paper in China before moving on to the by now standard scenes of logging and a pulp and paper mill. At this point we're only two minutes in and we've already covered a few hundred thousand years of mankind. Next we get tributes to the importance of paper and facts and figures about tree production before shifting gears once again to a lecture on preventing forest fires including some fire footage. The film takes care to note that the main cause of fires isn't industry but careless citizens like you. This is an odd film with wild switches in timeline and a rambling narrative starting off with the standard praise of the industry that probably funded it and ending in a public safety lecture which was probably a selling point to market to educators. It's a little too earnest in its eagerness to pump up its importance with its references to poems, cavemen and ancient China (all in under twelve minutes) but it was probably perfect to show to Boy Scout troops and 4H clubs. One odd note is for a film that is supposed to be a tribute to trees there are no good shots of trees in the film itself, especially compared to the Canadian films and in fact the photography in general is pedestrian. Note the distributor listed as Wholesome Film Service on the title card but this was clearly added much later, probably in the 1940's or 50's and they would have simply bought the rights to distribute and as always it's also possible they made edits and changes to the film although the intertitles do remain constant throughout.
================================================
NATURE FILMS;
Nature and animal films could include some wildlife scenes along with footage of microscopic creatures that had never been seen before by the general public which could make these usually otherwise dry science and biology lessons of interest to non-students if they were photographed and presented in a creative manner.
"A DAY AT THE RIVER" (1928);
This time the river we visit is the rushing white water rapids of our previous films but instead an idyllic fishing hole complete with a Huckleberry Finn type character before we get to the main attraction which is detailed footage of various fish and crayfish and even some shots of microscopic larvae and eggs. This sort of footage was a new technique never seen before by laymen who were probably suitably impressed. This was an age of scientific discoveries and new technologies and even the general public took an interest. There is the barest trace of a narrative structure with the use of a framing device with our Huck Finn going to and leaving the fishing hole at the end. This film was made by DeVry Studios who specialized in educational films exclusively but it could have been more widely shown.
"DOWN AT THE POND" (1926);
This film dispenses with any sort of framing device aside from a quick glance of the pond before getting to the point of more close up footage of frogs and tadpoles. Some of this footage is quite striking and has a surreal quality of an alien world and must have seemed so to audiences at the time. In fact twenty years later as the age of Sci Fi films began footage like this would be used to show aliens, dinosaurs or creatures of the deep in many B Movies. This film is listed as a production of Neighborhood Films, a minor player but it also credits as having been edited by "Pathe, Bray, Wythe and other libraries" including Urban-Kineto, Searchlight and another whose logo I can't make out. With a generic name like Neighborhood I can find few other details about the company but they do have a few other films listed in the educational films catalogue including a space film I covered in my article about 1920's space docs a few years ago. They seem to have been more of a distributor than a studio that shot their own footage but instead edited together footage from other films.
"ANTS; NATURE'S CRAFTSMAN" (date unknown);
One of a series from Pathe it's a few minutes longer than usual and thus too long to be added to a theatrical bill and is purely a stolid classroom tool. We get the usual close ups of the ants as well as plenty of explanatory intertitles which also occasionally personalize them somewhat. What we don't get however is a good view of the interior of the anthill which is odd since the concept of Ant Farms must have been known by then. This film lacks any of the slightly cinematic touches of some of the other films although it does take a somewhat morbid interest in the ants' more violent tendencies.
"BEES & SPIDERS" (date unknown);
This is similar to "Ants" but it has a slightly breezy style including introducing the bees at the start as if they were cast members. This is really a fragment as the title card is missing as is the ending so we don't know what the full version included and the title is a guess. We also don't know who made it although it's evidently not from Pathe. Once again this one is purely for school use.
"DEVELOPMENT OF A SALAMANDER" (date unknown);
Made for Yale University this one about the life cycle of a salamander from egg to adult delivers what it promises but is quite dry and of would be of no interest other than purely educational but some of the photography is rather striking and probably looked otherworldly at the time.
"MANY WINGS" (1927);
This one from one of the smaller independents is has a more lyrical than educational theme consisting mostly of random shots of sea birds without any real context. The shots are pretty and restful but have little to no educational value and even though the studio is named Educational Pictures this is more of a gentle art film. The studio's slogan as "The Spice Of The Program" suggests that this film at least would be just as happy as one of the opening reels of a matinee.
=================================================
SCIENCE FILMS;
The 20's was a time of groundbreaking scientific discoveries in a number of fields that even the general public were aware of even if they didn't necessarily understand them or their larger significance so a few of these films might have been of some interest to the public if they were presented in a visually striking or entertaining manner.
"THE STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH; VOLCANOS" (1923);
Made by Pathe in conjunction with Harvard University with a combination of footage of eruptions and shots of various volcanoes both active and dormant (including Mount Rainier which we visited earlier) and animated cross sections. Some of the volcano footage includes aerial shots which was still a fairly new technology, the animation if rather crude however. We close off with some dramatic shots of slow moving lava destroying a village which must have left quite an impression on contemporary viewers.
"AIR; A LESSON IN GENERAL SCIENCE" (1928);
Another from DeVry this one uses some dramatic footage of rushing rivers and a ship being buffeted by gale force winds but the really spectacular shots are some animated footage of a tornado which actually looked real at first blowing through a town in slow motion as a menacing dark cloud. Later it becomes clear that it was animated but it's still well done, we also get some other more obvious animated footage. After that the film gets more matter-of-fact but does still have some well shot footage. Oddly this film isn't really about the air itself but more about wind air currents and air pressure and it does seem to ramble off topic at times but it does have some shots of early air travel including planes in flight and some even more striking parachute jumps and some undersea footage which was still difficult to shoot.
"THE STORY OF ASBESTOS" (1922);
Filmed by the US Department Of The Interior for the Johns-Manville Mining Company this is another corporate propaganda film masquerading as an educational film. Besides being twice as long as usual it's not especially noteworthy as a film being a straightforward presentation of the mining and production of asbestos done with no particular flair. However the film does take on a horrifying aspect in retrospect as we now know that asbestos is highly carcinogenic something the film has no clue of. In one of the first intertitles we are assured that the mineral can be handled as easily as "wool or cotton" and throughout we see people casually doing just that with nobody wearing masks or even gloves. Wecan assume that literally all these people later died of cancer or any number of other respiratory diseases. Speaking of historical hindsight, although this is an American film, we spend most of it in Canada where we also see footage of the dreary town of Asbestos, Quebec, the mining town that grew up outside the world's largest asbestos mine. Over twenty years later the town became the center of a prolonged and violent strike as Johns-Manville backed by the conservative Union Nationale Quebec government tried to bust the union who among other issues were becoming concerned with the health issues of asbestos dust. One of the results of which was the start of the career of young lawyer Pierre Trudeau who arrived to advise the union (including telling them they had a right to use violence to defend themselves from strikebreakers) along with other figures who would become the leaders of modern Quebec and Canada in future leaders of the Liberals and Parti Quebecois including union leader Jean Marchand and journalists Gerrald Peltier, Pierre Laporte and Rene Lesvesque who would later defeat the Union Nationale in what is considered one of the watershed elections in Quebec and Canadian history. By 2011 the dangers of asbestos were well known and synthetic alternatives existed and the last mine was shut down. The town still exists looking pretty much as it does here however to escape it's stigma and appeal to a new economic base of hunters and fishermen the town changed it's name to the more scenic Val-Des-Sources in 2020.
================================================
HEALTH;
Speaking of asbestos, a specific type of educational film explained how the body worked and advocated for public health issues. Accordingly some of the latter films were intended to also be shown to the general public.
"SUNSHINE; A ROMANCE" (1929);
Made by Rothacker Productions, who I've never heard of, this film differs from other such films in that instead of using a dry presentation of facts it is instead presented as a docudrama to give it's message of the health benefits of getting plenty of sunshine. This was a common theme in the Victorian Era and the early twentieth centuries when urban reformers worried about the gloominess of the asphalt jungle and the urchins who grew up there and worked in dingy factories or mines. The story involves a young married couple (who are expecting) living in the big city being visited by their older aunt and uncle from the country who are appalled to discover a distinct lack of sunlight. The women take a drive in the country so the Aunt can show the benefits of rural living while the men go to some sort of laboratory so a scientist can explain how sunshine leads the growth in plants and then dinosaurs and cavemen using some diagrams, footage borrowed from "The Lost World" and actual footage of children with rickets. Besides sunlight the scientist also advocates eating yeast which is sold in little foil wrapped cubes and can be used in cooking or eaten raw like a piece of cheese which is not something that ever caught on. The film does not mention that one can get vitamin d from not yeast foods like milk and cheese and it's likely the was financed by a yeast farming lobby group. The film is a little strident (at one point it seems to imply we were better off before clothes were invented, a message the implications of which they probably didn't think through) and overly preachy about the benefits of country life and eating yeast. The young couple also seem pretty dense with the wife bandly stating that everytime her plants die she just throws them out and buys new ones to the horror of the Aunt. The film does have a coherent story and the young couple are nice enough but this is much longer than it needed to be.
"GENERAL HEALTH" (1928);
Made by DeVry, this film covers much of the ground as the "Sunshine" film minus the yeastiness. It also contrasts the unhealthy city with the wholesome country although its urban footage looks much gloomier and is clearly genuine footage of tenements while the farm is shown as a rustic sun dappled idyll complete with Huckleberry Finn type heading off to the fishing hole. On the other hand it also shows a more barren Dustbowl type farm as unhealthy and lacking in clean drinking water. This film is stronger for its use of actual footage and dispensing with the attempts at a story and lectures from scientists in white coats thus it's also much shorter although it's obvious some if it is missing.
"SWAT THE FLY" (date unknown);
This one from a smaller studio warns against the dangers posed by possible disease carrying flies and calls for preventative measures. It has some fine closeup shots, some rather more gross shots of maggots on food and a spectaular view of the multi-lensed fly's eye view of the world. After footage of the dastardly fly we get closeup footage of our noble friends in this battle; the spider, the wasp and the bat. This one was made with the general public in mind.
"HOW WE BREATHE" (early 20's);
Bray Studios with their animation dept were well suited to these type of films with their stable of animators who would later go on to found their own studios including the Fleischer Brothers (who would go to create the iconic Betty Boop, Popeye and Superman toons), Walter Lanz (who would create Woody Woodpecker), Paul Terry (founder of Terrytoons, home of Mighty Mouse, Deputy Dawg and Heckle & Jeckle) and Vernon Stallings (who created the Krazy Kat toons and later worked in Disney features). Here we have two typical examples from Bray Studios.Unlike other films here this one is almost entirely animated and can show microscopic images no conteporary technology could have. The tile is self explanatory and there is attempt to tell any narrative with information being shown in a dry way however the animation, while basic and with little actual movement is well illustrated enough to explain it's points clearly.
"HOW WE HEAR"(early 20's);
The animation in this one is similar but the animation has more movement and has some almost surreal imagry that would not be out of place in one of the Dada short films made around the sme time by Geramn director Hans Richter.
"MAN" (1928);
Although credited as being from DeVry this is clearly from Bray Studios and has some of the same animation as :How We Hear" and "How We Breathe" showing how footage could be reused and also distributors like DeVry could just buy the rights from another studio and resell them, perhaps after making some changes and edits. We get some animation of ameobas before using some of the other footage to show how the body works.
===================================================
TECHNOLOGY;
Another category of educational film that was meant as much for the general public if not more so were films made explaining new types of technology. The 20's witnessed a dizzying array of toys that were either new inventions or that had perhaps been around for a few years but were only now being sold to the public in a big way ranging from automobiles to airplanes, from gramophones to radios, from typewriters to telephones to the even more futuristic x-ray machines. For some these new technologies were exciting while to others they were worrisome but all were eager to marvel at how they worked.
"HOW TO USE A DIAL PHONE" (1927);
Telephones had been around for over twenty years in more or less general use but these phones had required an operator to connect the call. By the end of the 20's there was a new invention that would enable people to make person to person calls. This film was commissioned specifically for the Bell Company for Fresno, California (presumably the same films went out to other cities) and gives detailed instructions for how to use the new dial phone as well as the new phone book. This one has some charming cartoon animation that is different from the more detailed animation of Bray Studios and it would be interesting to find out who did it. Given that there's a whole generation who have never used either a dial phone or phone book this one is now sort of helpful.
"HOW THE TELEPHONE TALKS" (date unknown);
Another effort from Bray Studios with their trademark mix of finely detailed animation and occasional live action shots. This one delivers exactly what it promises and explains how a phone works not as in the technology but specifically how it processes spoken and audio sound and as such would go along with the other Bray Studios film about how the ear works.
"SOUND WAVES" date unknown);
This Bray film continues on in a similar vein showing how sound, although using less animation, in favour of the sort of experiments that could be replicated in a classroom. This film is somewhat shorter than usual but it may have been cut off.
"COMMUNICATION" (1928);
Another by DeVry, this film also gives a lecture about how sound works that is not only the same as the Bray Studios films "How We Hear" and "How The Telephone Talks" it even recycles the same footage including the instantly recognizable surrealist animation along with some stock footage. As I noted in my earlier essay about the Space Documentaries taking footage from other films, even those from other studios, and editing it into new films without giving credit was not unusual but it was not usually this blatant and also not usually done by a company like DeVry which had it's own studios.
"THE HOME ELECTRICAL" (1915);
This early effort was produced by General Electric as a promotional tool to extoll the future of the all-electric home (plus a car) and simply involves a young couple escorting a guest through their home and showing off their state-of-the-art toys which include a vacuum cleaner, sewing machine, razor, iron, washing machine, soldering gun and various kitchen appliances. Some of these are less practical than others with the "electric lighted cigars" never quite catching on. Note that the audience for this would be the new prosperous middle-class like the couple shown here who live in a large and spacious house with a maid.
"THE WONDER OF X-RAYS" (date unknown);
While most of these films are either American or Canadian (with the possible exception of the one about New Zealand) this Dutch film shows the use of x-ray machine which had been around for a little while but were now more commonly being used for lesser ailments including dental x-rays as shown here at the start. By this time it was now known that x-rays were dangerous and required special heavy gloves and screens which the film also shows which probably made the whole x-ray experience seem even more terrifying and dehumanizing to the viewers.
"PRINCIPLES OF ELECTROMAGNETISM" (1927);
This film from DeVry is highly technical and beyond the grasp or interest of the average viewer relying entirely on shots and diagrams with blocks of text with the animated imagery seeming to be done in Bray's style. Originally released in two parts and put together it does drag on a bit although some of the animated diagrams have some flair. It's worth noting that this film is credited as being "Distributed by DeVry" rather than produced by them with the producers being listed as a Carpenter-Goldman Production. Frank Lyle Carpenter was a former architect who like so many others got his start with Bray Studios (where his cousin worked) as early as 1918 and later went on to found his own studio under the name Carpenter-Goldman Laboratories where he would work with the Fleischer Brothers and Paul Terry and with his own most notable toon being a B&W version of "Goldilocks & The Three Bears" in the early thirties and a stop action short about how telephones work. He later went to work with Jam Handy in the thirties where he continued specializing in animation and stop action animation for corporate clients into the 1960's when he retired.
"FINDING HIS VOICE" (1929);
One of the best known films Frank Carpenter and the Fleischers produced together was "Finding His Voice" (1929) about how talking films worked using cartoon characters.
"HOW ANIMATED CARTOONS ARE MADE" (1919);
We close off with a short from Bray Studios showing how the animation process worked hosted in live action footage by Wallace Carlson. Although youthful looking Carlson was about twenty-five here he was actually already a veteran cartoonist having produced his own shorts as early as 1914 starting out as a newspaper cartoonist (as had fellow pioneer Winsor McCay) and is considered one of the pioneers of animation. He was quickly hired by Essanay Studios where he created a number of now forgotten but successful characters as Joe, the Gumps and Dreamy Dud, a Dennis The Menace type who we see here. By 1917 he moved to Bray Studios and continued on until 1921 when he suddenly quit animation altogether, apparently tired of the grind of producing animated strips which he mocks here. He returned to doing newspaper comic strips with one one of these, "The Nebbs" being successful enough to lead to a radio serial in the 1940's after which he retired and his daughter took over the strip for many years. He died in 1967. This film appears to feature Bray as himself.
JOHN BRAY