Showing posts with label Expressionism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Expressionism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 November 2023

German Expressionist Film In the Nazi Era


MV5-BM2-Qw-Mj-U2-OTEt-ZWFi-Ni00-Y2-M3-LTk2-Yjgt-Nj-Yz-NTMy-NDVm-OTJl-Xk-Ey-Xk-Fqc-Gde-QXVy-NTA2-NDc4-OA-V1

Expressionism is the defining film genre of Weimar Germany and indeed one of the most important of the entire interwar film era. It's themes of exploring loneliness, alienation, madness, dehumanization, nightmares, hallucinations and untamed emotions and it's esthetic world of shadows, fog, pools of light and artificiality would influence future genres of horror, film noir and science fiction from Hitchcock and James Whale down to Tim Burton and Ridley Scott. Not to mention any number of rock videos. However, it's time in German film barely survived the decade and would be stamped out, as would so much art, by the coming to power of the Nazis in 1933. In fact Expressionism as a genre was already in decline by then, made passe partly by the inevitable change in tastes encouraged by the coming of sound and it's change of focus away from the purely visual and partly by the coming of the Great Depression when the public's desire was to escape from the gloom of their lives than to watch it on screen.

Nevertheless there's no doubt the nail in the coffin was the Nazis. Adolf Hitler (a failed artist) and Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels (a failed novelist) were convinced they were experts in art and music and like all Fascists the Nazis taste in art was reactionary in the extreme and like everything else was to be at the service of the state in fostering "patriotism". Fascist art celebrates hyper traditionalism with plenty of bombastic pseudo Greco-Roman and Nordic art, equally hyper masculinity (which often crosses over into unintional homoerotic self-parody which is even more hilarious since Fascists seem to be the only ones who can't spot it), militarism and absolute conformity and obedience to strongman leaders and strict social hierarchies. There is no room for or tolerance Modern Art (basically from the Impressionist Era onward) with it's themes of abstraction, self-reflection, decadence, loneliness and the inner world of dreams and the psyche. Fascism allows for no inner world at all demanding instead constant outward displays of mindless fealty. The Nazis classed virtually all Modern Art as officially "Degenerate" including the distinctly German creations of Expressionism, Dada, Cabaret and the Die Bruke movement and Bauhaus Design school as well as Surrealism, Cubism, Futurism, Fauvism and Art Nouveau which they publicised with the infamous display of "Degenerate Art" in 1937 which became something of an embarrassment as some of the art turned out to be more popular with curious audiences than the officially sanctioned art exhibit that happened at the same time.    

BN-AG386-1104de-P-20131104120538
"DEGENERATE ART" EXHIBITION

Hitler and Goebbels paid special attention to the film for it's propaganda potential. They had no doubt noticed how the Soviets had used film as a propaganda tool coining the name "Agitprop" including the films of iconic director Sergi Eisenstein such as "The Battleship Potemkin". They were also notably fans of Sherlock Holmes films, westerns, Disney cartoons and even Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" which Hitler screened several times in spite of the movie being banned. A particular favorite of both was "Gone With The Wind" as a pro-Confederate epic and were envious of Germany not really having an equivalent, which would eventually lead to an attempt to make their own historical epic in "Kolberg" (1945) considered to be possibly the biggest money losing bomb of all time.

The Nazi attitude towards German film and Expressionism was contradictory. Upon taking power in 1933 they imposed an immediate stop to most productions while they were evaluated for their value to the state and the Party with many films being banned including "All Quiet On The Western Front" (antiwar), "Tarzan & His Mate" (too erotic), "The Prize Fighter & The Lady" (starring Jewish boxer Max Baer), and even Chaplin's "The Kid" for some reason along with of course any films with obvious gay content (as I already wrote about here). Directives were swifty issued banning Jews from the industry entirely and when to their credit Dacho, the film actors and directors organization, bravely protested it was immediately disbanded. Many actors and directors spotting the writing on the wall took the chance to flee the country leading to an exodus in talent that included actors Marlane Dietrich, Peter Lorre, Conrad Veidt, Elizabeth Berenger, Oskar Homolka, John Gottwott, directors Billy Wilder, Hans Richter, Otto Preminger, Douglas Sirk, Robert Wiene and composer Kurt Weill. At first Geobeels was happy to see them go but then rather belatedly he realized the brain and talent drain would hurt the German film industry and made attempts to woo the film community. Many top Nazis including Hitler, Goebbels and Goering were shameless starfuckers both figuratively and in the case of Geobbels and Goering literally with both carrying on affairs with actresses, leading to personal appeals to certain actors and directors. Danish actress Asta Neilsen had been a major star in German film since the Great War when photos of her had been posted in the trenches by soldiers and while by 1933 she was in her fifties she was still popular enough for Goebbels and Hitler to invite her to dinner and offer her her own studio. She instead announced her retirement and returned to Denmark where she would quietly oppose the Nazis.

tumblr-onw8ozp-Pa-U1rttlrno6-400
ASTA NIELSEN

If Asta was no longer thought of as a sex symbol that was certainly not true of Brigitte Helm of "Metropolis" fame. Helm was the very epitome of an Aryan sex symbol, tall, slim, statuesque, blonde, blue eyed and stunningly beautiful. Helm was no Nazi though, even having a Jewish banker as a boyfriend. Goebbels did have additional leverage on Helm as she also had a taste for speed known for her reckless driving which ended in a serious car crash that resulted in a death and Helm being charged with manslaughter. Hitler was a fanboy and intervened to make the charges go away and she was invited to yet another dinner with offers of film roles but she instead wasted no time in skipping to Switzerland with her Jewish boyfriend who she married and retired from film.

5201547424-f8cfa7a96f-c
BRIGITTE HELM

The Polish born Pola Negri was a special case. She had been a huge star in the early twenties Germany before moving to Hollywood to further success however with the coming of sound she returned to Europe living in France and working in Germany as well. As she was Polish Goebbels hated Negri as not being insufficiently Aryan as well as difficult and refused to give her the official certificate to allow her to work in Germany but ever the Diva she simply went over his head to Hitler himself where the Fuhrer, ever the fanboy, was instantly charmed and gave her the prized certificate granting her carte blanche to continue working much to Geobbels' fury. She was not even required to make propaganda and instead focused on her beloved costume dramas until the Nazis invaded France when she quickly packed up and returned to Hollywood. Famously Fritz Lang claimed that Goebbels personally offered him the chance to be the head of the German film industry but Lang instead took the chance to flee to Hollywood. Lang was probably exaggerating his importance. As we've seen it's likely that he was offered a prominent role in German film but it's impossible to picture a micromanaging control freak like Goebbles handing control of the entire German film industry to a figure like Lang with an established reputation and obvious talent and who was not even a member of the Nazi Party. By contrast Lang's wife screenwriter Thea Harbau stayed in Germany and became a Nazi as did actors Werner Krause ("The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari"), Emil Jannings ("The Last Laugh" & "Faust"), Heinrich George, director Carl Froelich and of course Leni Riefenstal. Most seem to have kept out of politics, kept their heads down and kept their jobs such as directors GW Pabst, Herbert Selpin and Walter Ruttmann and actors Lil Dagover ("Caligari"), Erna Morena (the original "Pandora's Box" & "Diary Of A Lost Girl"), Paul Wegener ("Der Golem") and Hans Albers ("The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes"). With Wegener and Albers (and Asta Neilsen) making occasional covert gestures against the Nazis.

Quickly Goebbels would impose strict quotas on foreign films, nationalized the entire German film industry (in fact being practically the only industry the Nazis actually nationalized) and appointed a Reichsdramaturg to oversee all productions. There would end up being a series of these officials and it's telling that none of them had any legitimate film experience and were instead obscure film critics for Nazi papers and loyal party members none of whom lasted more than a few years while Goebbels himself appointed the army of censors who would rule what would be allowed. Goebbels would also famously screen at least one film a night even at the height of the war often sending notes and "suggestions" for changes to be made for his approval.

Besides being a genuine film fan Goebbels was no fool and he quickly learned much to his annoyance that overt propaganda films were simply not popular with the general public who performed the light comedies, musicals and lush costume dramas fashionable at the time so he eventually decided that such escapism had some value in distracting the public from their problems and the bulk of the films of the Nazi era would thus fall into these genres and it is estimated that less than a quarter of films produced under the Nazis were actually propaganda films. The sort of films inspired by Expressionism such as horror, film noir crime films, supernatural mysteries, sexually provocative dramas or challenging art films were another matter however. Such films might provoke people to look inward, think negative thoughts, question official conformity and think creatively, always a danger to authoritarians. Besides the Expressionist methods and tropes of elliptical and non-linear storytelling, obscure symbolism, the sympathetic portrayal of the ugly, explorations of sexuality, the mocking of authority and the rejection of logic in favour of the celebration of the world of dreams and nightmares, simply make authoritarians uncomfortable and angry for reasons they can't quite nail down.

Accordingly in German films there would be no more horror like "Nosferatu". No more master criminals like Dr Mabuse or Dr Caligari. No more dark psychological or sexually charged dramas like "Die Strasse" or the films of Asta Neilsen and Lousie Brooks. No more weird fantasies with foreign 9or worse Jewish) themes like "Der Golem". Instead film, like all art must be positive, uplifting and patriotic or at least frothy escapism. However no system is perfect even in a dictatorship and a few odd exceptions did sneak though. The classic books on German film of the Weimar years; Sigfried Kracauer's "From Caligari To Hitler" (1947) and Lotte Eisner's "The Haunted Screen" (1952) do not deal with this era at all unfortunately as is the case with most books on German film but "Film In The Third Reich" by David Stewart Hull (1969) does a thorough job although he does miss a few films. Hull does list three or four films which would fall into the category of if not strictly Expressionist than certainly Expressionist themed films that somehow managed to make it through the layer of Nazi censors. Hull's book does have some glaring omissions, possibly due to the difficulty at the time of finding copies of some films, a problem he mentions, and he largely seems to have limited himself to films he could actually view which leaves out such notable films a version of "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" (1939), "Der Schimmelreiter", an adaptation of a novel with a supernatural theme and Film Noirs "Ich War Jack Mortimer" (1935) and "The Unknown" some of which can now be seen publicly.

6dm-LWTBtftx-ZCp-Zu-CWMv-X2m04-Y8

The first of these was "Anna Und Elisabeth" which was released in April 1933 only four months after the Hitler was appointed Chancellor and only a month after the Enabling Act was passed giving him dictatorial powers and the same month Goebbels started to take control of the film industry. Thus it was one of the last films made under the old Weimar system although released under the Nazis before the imposition of a full censorship pre-clearance system who probably would not have otherwise allowed it through with it's theme of dark and mysterious supernatural powers and a vaguely lesbian subtext with the two stars of the acclaimed overtly lesbian themed "Madchen In Uniform'' (1932).  

"ANNA UND ELISABETH" (1933);


Directed by Frank Wisbar
CAST;
Hertha Thiele  ~  Anna
Dorothea Wieck  ~  Elisabeth Testa
Carl Bathaus  ~  Martin, Anna's Brother
Mathias Wieman ~ Mathias Testa
Maria Wanck  ~  Margarete, Elisabeth's Sister
Willy Kaiser-Heyl  ~  The Priest
Karl Platen  ~  The Doctor
Roma Bahn ~ Mary Lane
Dorothea Thiess  ~  Anna's Mother
Plot Synopsis (spoiler alert); Anna is a young woman in her late teens living with her parents and brother in a small town who seems to have a faith based power to cure illness and even death by her touch as she is able to raise her brother from the dead after an unexplained illness. The town Doctor declares it a miracle but the town Priest is skeptical. Local villagers hear about the miracle and begin to gather outside the house wanting to be cured, including an old woman with a spinal neck injury. Anna is hesitant to accept her new powers but the woman takes her hand and claims that she has been cured. The Priest tells the townspeople to go home but the old woman tells them of her cure and they stay.
Elisabeth is a wealthy woman who lives with her husband Mathias and younger sister on an island outside town and who has suffered and unexplained illness or injury which has confined her to a wheelchair. She is desperate for a cure and hearing about Anna sends her husband to summon her. He is reluctant and does not believe in faith healing but he does meet with Anna. She tells him she is scared and tired and he is sympathetic but he does convince her to visit the island and meet with Elisabeth. The next moring she heads out alone in a rowboat to the island and meets with Elisabeth who begs for a cure. Anna again denies she has any powers and turns to leave. As she does, Elisabeth rises from her wheelchair and suddenly has the power to walk. The two women return to town where word has already spread and the old and sick of the town are waiting for them. Elisabeth insists that Anna come and live with her so her healing powers can be properly managed and she will be safe from the crowd and she agrees. Elisabeth keeps Anna isolated from the town and her family. Mathias and her sister try to talk Elisabeth out of the arrangement as does the Priest. Anna's brother Martin sneaks into Elisabeth's manor to talk Anna into leaving but while Anna says she is unhappy she also now believes in her powers. Elisabeth's husband visits the Priest and expresses his continued doubts. Elisabeth is visited by Mary Lane, a promoter who proposes a partnership to send them on tour to publicize Anna's gift but Elisabeth sends her away. Elizabeth meets with the Priest who tells her that the Church has heard about Anna and is sending an investigator to evaluate her. Elisabeth suggests a public demonstration at the Church. Elisabeth's husband has been ill and has been getting worse and now Elisabeth is informed that he appears to be dying. She sends for Anna to cure him. Anna comes to his bedside and prays but it is no use and he dies anyway. Both women are upset and run away separately. Back at the Church the villagers are gathering bringing their sick relatives to be cured. Elisabeth finds Anna to convince her to come to the Church but Anna refuses saying she failed to cure Mathias. Elisabeth says he died because he had no faith and Anna says she has lost her faith as well and again refuses. Despondent Elisabeth wanders off alone. Anna tells Martin she is now concerned about her. Elisabeth wanders to the edge of a cliff and Anna has a vision of her jumping off. She and Martin run to the Church for help and we are next shown Elisabeth in bed dying with Anna, Martin and the Priest present. She says that she will soon be free as will Anna as the scene fades out. Finis.  

tumblr-mlxcfs-MI5-Z1r2pr9zo1-400

In "Madchen In Uniform" Hertha Thiele had played a teen sent to a girl's boarding school where she falls in love with one of the headmistresses played by Dorothea Wieck in a film that is widely seen as one of the finest of the Weimar's brief sound film era and is now considered a minor classic especially for it's largely sympathetic portrayal of a same sex relationship and the performances of it's two stars. The film was not only acclaimed by German critics but also in foreign countries where it was exported to rave reviews. Accordingly the reunion of the two stars was anticipated and modern film historians have noted a gay subtext in the relationship between the two women here they may be reading too much between the lines. Elisabeth's obsession and possessiveness of Anna is certainly unhealthy it appears genuine and aside from a few lingering close up shots of the two gazing inscrutably at each other it's hard to see any real sexual subtext here especially as Elisabeth is clearly in love with her devoted husband. The film's religious theme is clearly more central as Anna is seen as a sincere if conflicted believer whose power comes from prayer and is accepted as such by everybody else. When she is successful in curing people it is seen as her being a vehicle while her failure to save Mathias is blamed on his lack of faith. Interestingly the only other figure besides Mathias who doubts her powers is the town Priest with even the Doctor calling her cures miracles. The ending is ambivalent; Anna says she too has lost her faith and thus her powers yet she does have a vision of Elisabeth jumping to her death and while at the end Elisabeth is show apparently on her death bed and it's implied she is about to die she doesn't actually do so as we fade out and the fact that she has survived such a fall at all is something of a miracle. Does Anna still have her powers after all? It is unclear.

5822078408-e0783c7b1e-b

With it's religious and supernatural themes this is an oddity in German film and while not exactly Expressionist, with its themes of fantasy, the supernatural, isolation and self doubt it does show some Expressionist imagery that would become rare in the Nazi era. The town is typically Expressionist with it's crumbling houses and winding claustrophobic lanes looking like those of "Der Golem" and the various Street Films such as "Die Strasse" and "The Joyless Street" and the island that Elisabeth and Mathias live on seems like a fantasy with their grim manor surrounded by jagged trees although the manor's interiors are simple and unadorned. The film makes little use of Expressionist tropes of shadowplay with most of the action taking place during the day aside from a scene where Elisabeth, still in her wheelchair, is presented with the shadows of window blinds appearing to show her behind bars and when Elisabeth is upset or Anna has her vision of Elisabeth at the cliff's edge we get some soft focus blurriness.

The films setting of an ancient looking village and Elisabeth's mysterious island further the film's odd dreamlike atmosphere as does it's sense of being slightly out of time where most of the characters dress in contemporary clothes but there seem to be no modern devices such as phones or even electricity until the publicist Mary Lane drives up in her car and her very modern clothes and being very pushy and arrogant. It's worth noting that aside from the cynical Mary Lane the other character who has a distinctively modern look is Mathias who does not believe in miracles. In a scene where he is at the manor waiting for Anna he is shown sitting at the piano bathed in light although looking forlorn. In the end he dies but we never really learn whether Anna's powers are real or not or what will become of her or what the nature of her symbiotic relationship with Elisabeth was. Like most early sound films, director Wisbar seems unsure of what to do with music in the film and it's used sparingly aside from the typically overly melodramatic opening.  

Frank-Wisbar-1961
FRANK WISBAR

  As this film was actually made before the Nazis took over the film industry, Goebbels imposed his film vision so it had little interference of the sort he would become notorious for. In fact it's an open question as to whether he would have even allowed the film to be made at all. The Nazis were hostile to most portrayals of the supernatural, magic and mysticism aside from their own official glorification of their supposed sacred Aryan mythological past (which Goebbels and even Hitler privately ridiculed to some degree) and the very Catholic mysticism of this film would have made them uneasy. There were other Fascist regimes (especially Franco's or Vichy France) that would have accepted the films's mystical premise but this was a poor fit for the Nazis. Despite the fame of its two leads the film was not a success with critics puzzled by it's ambivalent theme, muted tone and downbeat ending. It got an even more lackluster reception abroad. This was was actually one of the last German films to be exported as soon Geobbels would impose restrictive quotas on foreign imports aside from a few friendly countries like Italy. Predictably those countries, including America and most of Europe quickly responded with quotas of their own and along with boycotts of Nazi goods essentially collapsed the German export market for the rest of the Nazi era. Previously "Machden In Uniform" had gotten rave reviews but American critics found this film slow and muddled. Eventually Goebbels did get around to banning the film after it had already been shown and unlike "Madchen" it has been largely forgotten today although Hertha Thiele always listed it as one of her favorite roles. In their books Kracauer mentions the film only in a footnote while Eisner dimisses in in passing as "not a success".

thiele-hertha-08
HERTHA THIELE

The two leads would have different careers under Nazi rule and afterwards. Hertha Thiele (born 1908), being another young pretty blonde, was naturally popular with Nazi feminine ideals and like Brigitte Helm was offered big roles if she would agree to play ball with the Nazi propaganda machine but as a supporter of leftist causes she breezily refused and soon found herself sidelined and in 1937 also like Helm she moved to Switzerland. After the war she moved back and forth between Switzerland and East Germany where she found some work in theatre and TV. Late in life she was able to see her work be reconsidered by German film historians, especially for "Madchen". She died in 1984 aged 76.

Dorthea Wieck (born 1908, note that while in their films together Wieck always played the older woman they were actually the same age) was originally Swiss but moved to Germany as a child and started acting onstage and silent films in her teens. She was noted for her soulful but dignified dark eyed beauty and racked up a long list of film roles even occasionally appearing in American films. Like Asta Neilsen, Brigitte Helm and Theile she was popular with the Goebbels and Hitler but unlike them she was willing to be wooed by the new regime with her husband, a wealthy Baron, being a Nazi supporter and she continued to work easily throughout the era even being given special praise by Goebbels. After the war such an association would be enough to effectively end the careers of the likes of Leni Reifenstal, Emil Jannings and Werner Krause but Wieck seems to have convinced the West German authorities that she hadn't played any significant propaganda role for the regime and she was allowed to continue her career albeit in supporting roles into the sixties when she effectively retired. She died in 1986 aged 78.              

lf
DOROTHEA WIECK

Director Frank Wisbar would have a unique career under the Nazis. Born in 1899 but not starting his film career until 1932 meant that unlike most directors of his time he did not make any silent films although he reportedly did work as an assistant director on the aforementioned "Madchen In Uniform" and Carl Dreyer's near silent "Vampyr", His own tastes seemed to run from odd supernatural themed melodramas to frothy comedies. It was the latter films that were popular with Nazi authorities including winning an award in 1935 and although he made no overt propaganda films it was probably these films that allowed him enough freedom to make the few supernatural films released in that era including the strangely Gothic Expressionist "Farmann Maria" in 1936.

"FAHRMANN MARIA" (1936);


Directed by Frank Wisbar
CAST;
Sybille Schmitz  ~  Maria
Albert Moog  ~  The Refugee
Peter Voss  ~  Death
Karl Platen  ~  The Ferryman
Carl De Vogt  ~  The Fiddler
Gerhard Bienert  ~  The Wealthy Farmer

Plot synopsis (spoiler alert); Set in the late nineteenth century in a rural village which is in a moor on a river which must be crossed via a small wooden ferry run by an old ferryman, one day a mysterious man appears waiting for a ride across the river. The stranger is tall, silent and dressed all in black. He does not speak but as the he is crossing the river the Ferryman suddenly dies and the stranger returns to the other side of the river leaving the village without a ferryman. Maria, a young woman passing through in need of money agrees to take the job which requires living in a small cottage on the river bank. One night a man arrives on the opposite bank exhausted and begging to be ferried over the river saying he is being pursued. Maria ferries him across just as six men ride up dressed in black and riding white horses. Seeing the man has crossed the river they turn and ride off without a word and the man collapses and Maria hides him in her cottage. The next morning the Refugee tells her he comes from a rich farm country which is under attack from an unknown enemy he has being on the run from which she had rescued him from and now he intends to return when but he promises to return. Other men appear from the village to crudely try and seduce Maria including a wandering fiddler and a wealthy farmer but she rebufs them as she has become infatuated with the Refugee. He becomes sick and feverish and has visions of the Black Riders returning. As he sleeps and the village prepares for it's harvest festival the tall silent stranger in black returns to the far bank and waits to be ferried across. As Maria pulls him across the river he asks her if she has carried across an injured man and at first she denies it but when the Stranger turns to look in her cottage she tells him the Refugee has gone to the village. She takes the stranger to the village where the festival is in swing. All the villagers regard the Man in Black with fear. The wealthy farmer who had accosted Maria earlier assumes she and the Man In Black are on date and challenges him to shoot dice for the honour of a dance with Maria which the stranger wins. As the Man In Black searches for the refugee Maria tries to distract him by dancing with him during which she feels faint. The farmer, now jealous interrupts the dance and accuses Maria in front of the villagers of having harbouring the stranger in her cottage and she runs away. Fleeing to a church she prays for help saying he would give her life to protect the refugee but the stranger Man In Black and says her prayers are useless. Maria tries to ring the church bell to summon help but no sound comes out. She breaks down and agrees to guide him through the moor to her cottage but she leads him astray and he stumbles into the marsh and is dragged down to drown. Maria returns to the cottage where the Refugee has awakened and she agrees to go off with him. They cross the river which is revealed to be rich farmland and they walk off together. Finis.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

imageedit-2-8312828508
This is a more explicitly Expressionist film than "Anna & Elizabeth"  both in its subject matter dealing with death, nightmares and the supernatural and in it's visual themes. Much of the film is shot at night and the swamp looks appropriately eerie and dreamlike. In fact the swamp looks remarkably similar to that in FW Murnau's "Sunrise; A Song Of Two Humans" which is probably not a coincidence. The Black Riders are especially arresting visually and in turn bear a striking resemblance for modern viewers to the Black Riders of Tolkien's "The Fellowship Of The Ring" although that probably is a coincidence. The figure of Death (assuming that's who he is) resembles classic Expressionist villains such as Dr Caligari, Count Orlack and Scampinelli from "The Student Of Prague" and his death as he is wordlessly sucked into the dark mire is a striking image that resembles the death of the villian Stapleton in the classic Sherlock Holmes "Hound Of The Baskervilles" and Dreyer's "Vampyr" suffocated in white powder. The character of the old Ferryman in turn exactly resembles the Renfield character from "Nosferatu" although they are not the same actor. As Maria, Sybille Schmitz is not the typical blonde Aryan leading lady but instead with her dark hair, sharp features and brooding stare she reminds one of classic Expressionist heroines Lil Dagover ("Caligari"), Lyda Salmonava ("Der Golem" and "The Student Of Prague") and Greta Schroeder ("Nosferatu") like Schroeder's Ellen, Maria is prepared to sacrifice herself for her love and again like Ellen she defeats Death by tempting him and then leading him to his doom. Unlike Nosferatu however who lusts creepily after Ellen here Death is impassive and seems to have little actual interest in her and she succeeds not by tempting him but through trickery. In another similar trope from Expressionist films Maria is in fact the only character to have a name as the others are essentially two dimensional symbols or archetypes with only Maria having any real character development.

  This is a better film than "Anna & Elisabeth" with a more coherent story and a stronger lead character. The visual themes are also better done and more consistent. Like "Vampyr" this could just as easily have been a silent film although it does make better use of music especially the menacing fanfare when Herr Death appears to Maria the first time although like other films of the era it does pad things out through musical interludes using the Fiddler character that could have been left out.      

  ferryman-strangler05
THE BLACK RIDERS

Besides the mystical themes some observers even at the time noted some veiled analogies to the Nazis in the form of Death and his Black Riders dressed in impecable black like Hitler's SS and the film is unique in the Nazi era. In fact Geobbels for his part disliked the film and considered it a failed experiment yet he still allowed it to be released partly because he was still trying to reassure the film community he would not micromanage them and possibly because he thought it might find a potential export market. In the event it found no audience either in German or abroad and was largely ignored by critics and has been all but forgotten today. Although it is sometimes referred to as the last example of pure German Expressionism it does not even rate a mention in Siegfried Kracauer or Lotte Eisner's books.

gunning-2
PETER VOSS AS DEATH

The same year Wisbar teamed up with Sybille Schmitz for another odd mystery film. "Die Unbekannte" (AKA "The Unknown") was based on a German novel "The Unknown Woman Of The Seine", which was in turn based on the true story of a woman whose body was fished out of the French River Seine in the 1880's. She was never identified even after her body was put on display and hundreds filed passed and her death mask was published in the papers. The mystery of her identity and the apparently serene look on her face fascinated artists in Europe in the 1890's inspiring books, paintings and sculptures. In this telling of her story the woman is named Madeline (played by Schmitz) and she is a high priced courtesan who tires of her life of parties and affairs and decides to leave Paris and falls in love with a wealthy German adventurer Thomas Bentick (played by French actor Jean Galland in a likely play for the export market) who invites her to stay at his house and and her to join him on a planned trip to Africa. However she is recognized by one of her past clients who threatens her with blackmail. Bentick is also a diplomatic agent for the German government and he is charged with a last minute secret mission forcing him to cancel his trip with Madeleine. Hearing about the cancelled trip and fearing her past will be used against her and will ruin his reputation the distraught Madeline drowns herself in the River Seine where she is found by the police who can not identify her.

The-Unknown-1936-film

This film has similar themes to the 1927 film "A Tragedy Of The Streets" starring Asta Neilsen (which I wrote about here) and could have certainly been shot in an Expressionist style however this time Wysbar chose to film the story as a straightforward romance which is rather bland as well as being overly talky and having little chemistry between the two leads. This is not an Expressionist film and has no such imagery so we need not spend more time on it. As a trivia note one of the supporting roles was played by the young Curt Jurgens who would later play the one of the most iconic Bond villains in "Goldfinger". Once again this film was not a success and hereafter Wisbar would return to the kind of frothy escapist romances that were favoured by Goebbels and the public at large for the next few years. Before the war he gave up and moved to Hollywood where he would have a long career mostly making low budget thrillers and later into television. In 1946 he made "The Strangler In The Swamp", inspired by and using some of the same imagery as "Fahrmann Maria".

"THE STRANGLER IN THE SWAMP" (1946);


The comparisons with "Fahrmann Maria" are obvious with its swamp, ferry, beautiful ferryman and mysterious stranger. But while this film is often billed as a remake of the earlier German film it is substantially different in it's story and themes entirely lacking the mysticism and mystery of the earlier film and is really a melodramatic ghost story. Instead of the enigmatic figure of Death the stranger is a vengeful ghost knocking off those who unjustly hanged him years before after framing him for murder. Since the stranger is a ghost there is no need for the Black Riders and they are completely absent, robbing the film of one of the earlier film's most memorable images. The Refugee on the run from an unknown foe is now a son returning home from the big city and there is still a Maria but while in the earlier film she was another wandering stranger her she is also a daughter returning from the city leaving a fairly conventional romance. This time she does not stand alone as there is the young man's father who sides with her and while as in the earlier film she does offer to sacrifice herself once she does so the ghost vanishes willingly rather than being lured into the swamp and drowned thus removing the earlier film's second most memorable image. This film does keep some of the visuals of the earlier film and even improves on the atmosphere of the swamp which is even more dark, foggy and eerie but the overall mood of this film is different and this is basically a romantic ghost story. Note the young man here is played by a young Blake Edwards who would later go on to become a writer and director responsible for the classic Pink Panther movies.      

strangler-of-swamp-poster-02

Sybille Schmitz would also star in another crime film which would make effective use of some themes from Expressionism and the related genre of Street Films from the Weimar era, this time directed by Carl Froelich who had produced "Madchen In Uniform".

"I WAS JACK MORTIMER" (1935);  


Directed by Carl Froelich
Cast;
Anton Wohlbruck  ~  Fred Spooner
Eugen Klopfer  ~  Pedro Montemayor
Sybille Schmitz  ~  Winifred Montemayor
Marieluise Claudius  ~  Marie Polikow
Hilde Hildebrand  ~  Daisy

Plot Synopsis (spoiler alert);  

Fred Spooner (Wohlbruck), a struggling Budapest taxi driver, is frustrated because he wants to marry his girlfriend Marie (Polikow) who works in a restaurant with her Russian emigre family. His big break seems to come one day when he assists a beautiful and wealthy Daisy (Hildebrand) with the engine of her car and is hired by her to act as her chauffeur on a trip down to Monte Carlo on very good wages. Fred tells Marie about his new job but tries to conceal that his new boss is a beautiful woman. On the same day celebrated conductor Pedro Montemayor (Klopfer) arrives in the city for a concert, accompanied by his younger wife Winifred (Schmitz). He is jealous, possessive and arrogant and his bullying has led her into a romance with American Jack Mortimer, who is also scheduled to arrive in the city that day and stay at the same hotel. Pedro has been spying on Winifred and has become aware of the affair.
Shortly after Fred picks up Mortimer in his taxi from the station, Montemayor shoots him dead from another car, then he dashes off to appear at a concert he will be conducting that night. At first Fred does not notice his passenger is dead when he does he at first tries to go to the police, but they are preoccupied and he becomes suddenly alarmed that he will be blamed for the murder he goes to his new boss Daisy and explains what happened, she advises him to go to the police and she dismisses him. Distraught, he drives through the city before dumping the body in a pond several miles away; however he forgets the suitcase left in the cab. He returns home and tells Marie of his plight, she too advises turning himself in and telling his story to the police but he refuses and she agrees not to tell the police.
Increasingly desperate, he remembers that he still has the dead man's bags in his cab. Realizing he bears a strong resemblance to the dead man and reasoning that if the American was known to have turned up at the hotel he won't be linked with his death he changes into Mortimer's elegant clothes and goes to impersonate him at the hotel for a brief time to establish his own alibi.
Winifred has become worried about Pedro's suspicions and tries to warn Mortimer by sending him a note and trying to call him but gets no answer. As she sits in the audience at the start of Pedro's concert Daisy arrives and tells her male companion about Fred's plight and Madeline partially overhears enough to be afraid that Mortimer may be the victim and she quickly leaves to try and phone Mortimer at the hotel. Unable to raise him on the phone she rushes off to his hotel and arrives to find Fred instead of Mortimer. In the midst of his concert Pedro notices Madeline has left but must wait until after the concert before he can leave and he too rushes off to the hotel to find Madeline and Fred. In the confrontation Fred blurts out that Mortimer is dead and Pedro accuses him of the murder. Madeline faints and Fred runs away, locking Winifred and Pedro locked up together in the hotel room.
A worried Marie sets out to look for Fred who has gone to the restaurant where she works but they miss each other and he sits down to wait for her. Her father who also works at the restaurant asks where Marie is but Fred brushes him off. A fellow cabbie shows up and tells him that blood has been found in the cab and the police are looking for him. Marie's Father overhears and demands to know what fred has done to Marie and fred runs off again. Marie has returned home but seeing police arriving dashes off to warn Fred. She hides in a party where a dance is going on and Fred finds her and she convinces him to turn himself in and they return to the hotel. Meanwhile Winifred and Pedro locked up together have been talking and he confesses to her. She tells him his jealousy has destroyed their marriage and he decides to call the police and turn himself in. Fred and Marie arrive at the hotel as Pedro is confessing and fred confesses to dumping Mortimer's body and impersonating him saying "I was Jack Mortimer". Pedro is led away accompanied by Madeline and the final shot is of a poster of Pedro being papered over. Finis.      

=================================================================
MV5-BYj-A1-ZDk2-Yj-Mt-MDI3-NS00-Zjg4-LWFi-Nm-Et-OGI3-OTBk-ZTky-ZGQx-Xk-Ey-Xk-Fqc-Gde-QXVy-Mzg1-ODEw-NQ-V1-FMjpg-UX1000

The film starts slowly and conventionally, shot in realistic style but once Mortimer is shot director Froelich makes use of the full arsenal of techniques from Expressionist and Street films as the cab races through darkened streets through pools of light reflecting off damp pavement. As Fred becomes more distraught his state of mind is shown through a rapid montage of blaring trumpets, close-ups of accusing faces, honking car horns and a dramatic shot of the empty cab with it's lights shining menacingly. Once Pedro notices Madeline is missing we get another montage of blaring musical instruments and a shot of Madeline's empty chair bathed in light glaring down at him. Significantly while the early part of the film was shot in daylight with regular edits and shots after the shooting most of the action is at night and sometimes obscured by shadow with faster edits and closeups to reflect the emotional states of Fred and Pedro. As Pedro, the possessive overbearing husband, Eugen Klopfer bears a strong and probably not coincidental resemblance to classic Expressionist villains played by Werner Krause, Emil Jannings and especially Paul Wegener. Unlike Frank Wisbar's films Froelich has plenty of music and makes good use of it during the scenes of Fred's cab racing through the streets and the montage of his thoughts with a tense blaring fanfare. Another clever use of sound that would not have been available in a silent film is the scene where Madeline strains to overhear as Daisy tells her date about Fred's story but is drowned out by the applause of the audience. Unlike classic Expressionist films which made use of artificial stage sets for a sense of unreality, something the two Frank Wysbar films did, this film uses realistic looking sets and street scenes which are clearly shot on location which is something it does have in common with the later Street Films like "Asphalt" (which it most closely resembles) and the sound crime film "M". Like many of the male characters in the Street Films the lead character Fred is a naive sap who is largely responsible for his own troubles through his own lying, panic and childlike short sighted stupidity (he is wrong every step of the way) and Pedro is an arrogant, jealous bully while the women; Marie, Madeline and Daisy being the only sensible ones who the men of course largely ignore.  

While this film is not strictly Expressionist it makes excellent use of Expressionist techniques and is probably the best German Film Noir of the era. Goebbels disapproved of crime films in general feeling they encouraged moral relativism and such films were uncommon but once again he allowed this film through perhaps recognizing its obvious quality and once again hoping it might find an international audience in the export market he had not yet quite given up on. Another possibility in getting the film the green light might lie in director Carl Froelich. While some directors who chose to stay in Germany such as Frank Wysbar and GW Pabst who basically stayed away from controversy to keep their jobs but avoided making overt propaganda Froelich became a Nazi and willingly made propaganda films for the regime. Froelich had a respected career going back to the Great War specializing in lush historical dramas including a biopic of Wagner, Hitler's beloved opera composer. He didn't actually join the Nazi Party until 1933 suggesting he was at least motivated more by opportunism but quickly became a favoured director being given the honorific "Filmprofessor" and being appointed director of the Reichskulturkammer, a trade organization which regulated all artistic activities in the Third Reich in 1933, a title he held until the fall of the regime. After the war his activities earned him an arrest and trial at one of the Denazification tribunals although he managed to evade a jail sentence his career was essentially over and he would make only two films before his death in 1953. In his book about cinema under the Nazis David Hull notes Froelich's genuine talent but laments his willingness to serve the Nazis which has likely led to this otherwise fine Noir genre film being forgotten.

Eugen Klopfer, who plays the bullying Pedro, also became a Nazi appearing in the notorious hate film "Jud Sus" (1940) and being awarded various titles and official positions in film and theatre. The fall of the regime also earned him an arrest along with a two month prison term in 1948. He would be banned from film work although after his release he was able to return to stage productions before his death in 1950. Leading man Anton Wohlbruck was no Nazi and being both half Jewish and gay he fled to Britain in 1936 where he continued acting in film including twice playing Prince Albert in biopics of Queen Victoria and the original version of "Gaslight". He retired from film in 1958 and returned to Germany where he worked occasionally on stage and TV until his death in 1967.

  schmitz-sybille-1246004
SYBILLE SCHMITZ

Sybille Schmitz would become a tragic figure. Born in 1909, had began in small roles in the low budget 1928 street film "Polizei Uberfall" (which I wrote about here) and the big budget GW Pabst/Louise Brooks film "Diary Of A Lost Girl" and Dreyer's "Vampyr" (which is presumably where she met Wysbar). Besides the Wysbar films she would also appear in the usual popular big budget romances where with her non Aryan looks and moody persona she was never popular with Goebbels who was probably also wary of her scandalous personal life which included alcohol and drug abuse and numerous affairs with both sexes. While she was not considered a leading lady she still continued to find decent roles playing exotic or vaguely dangerous fallen women in unusual (in the Nazi era) films like the crime film "I Was Jack Mortimer" (1935) and the sci-fi film "Master Of The World" (1934) and the big budget "Titanic" (1943). Although she played no significant propaganda role her continued success in the Nazi era and particularly the notorious "Titanic" dogged her in the post war era and she found herself shunned and harder to find work. By now in her forties and increasingly mentally fragile she died of a drug overdose in 1955 with the suspicion that her then live-in female lover, who was also her doctor, had been draining her funds and keeping her dependent may have been responsible for her overdose. She was 45.  

Marie Louise Claudius was only aged twenty two at the time she played Marie here but she had been acting since she was a teen. She would also appear in the odd and popular Sherlock Holmes reworking "The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes" (1937) but her career would be short however as she died of a sudden heart attack in 1941 aged only twenty nine and her grave would be lost in the chaos of the war and bombing. Hilde Hiledbrand at Fred's employer Daisy had appeared in the original version of "Victor/Victoria" (1933) and continued on with her career into the TV age, dying in 1976 aged 78.      

marieluise-claudius-dc9d1c01-332a-4493-8bb2-1e4e0de39f2-resize-750

Speaking of Sherlock Holmes as I mentioned in a previous article the character was always popular in Germany (Hitler himself was reportedly a fan) with adaptations going back before the Great War.The aforementioned "The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes" was more of an odd light comedy filmed in a straightforward style and mostly in daylight but the "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" with its setting of foggy moors at moonlight was a natural fit for Expressionist techniques with two silent versions directed by Richard Oswald in 1914 and 1929 with a sound version being made in 1937.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES" (1937);


Directed by Carl Lamac
Cast;
Bruno Guttner ~ Sherlock Holmes
Fritz Odemar ~ Dr Watson
Peter Voss ~ Henry Baskerville
Fritz Rasp ~ Barrymore
Erich Ponto ~ Stapleton
Alice Brandt ~ Beryl

Unlike Holmes films of the era this film actually does keep reasonably close to the original Conan Doyle story and the acting from the mostly b-level cast while non-descript is competent enough with Bruno Guttner as Holmes oddly resembling Raymond Massey who had already played Holmes. The two previous silent German Holmes films directed by Richard Oswald made some use of Expressionist techniques with some fine camera work of dark and foreboding sets at night and some fairly kinetic camera work, this film is far more conventional until the characters get to Baskerville Hall and the windswept Grimpen Mire when director Carl Lamac gets to make use of by now standard Expressionist techniques and we get some appropriately foggy and gloomy moors these scenes are perhaps inevitable given the novel's plot and setting but Lamac also does some good interior scenes at Baskerville Manor which has the appropriate shadowy rooms, stairways to nowhere and a scene where Watson questions the suspicious looking maid and she is entirely in shadow silhouette. This is otherwise a conventional Holmes film largely forgotten by most Holmesians but it is arguably the best of the early sound era pre-Basil Rathbone classic Holmes films of which there had already been several starring the likes of Clive Owen, Reginald Owen, Raymond Massey and Arthur Wotner. These films were most pretty perfunctory while this film's use of Expressionist tropes does at least have a definite sense of visual style. Director Lamac was actually a Czech who had started his career around 1918 when Czechoslovakia was still part of the Austrian Hapsburg Empire continuing after the Great War in Czechoslovakia, Austria and Germany. After Czechoslovakia was annexed by the Nazis in 1938 he fled to Britain where he served the Airforce and made war documentaries. After the war he worked in Hollywood as a cameraman and technician before returning to West Germany where he made a few more films before dying in 1952 of kidney disease.

ferryman-strangler11

=========================================

One of the classic Expressionist Horror films and also one of the first was "The Student Of Prague" (1913) starring Paul Wegener, best known for the even more iconic "Der Golem". These films established the basic Expressionist themes of dehumanization, isolation, madness and a nightmare world of shadows and fog and would later be remade in an even better and more artistic version in 1926 that reunited masters of Expressionist Horror acting Conrad Veidt and Werner Krause from "Caligari" (I already wrote about both films here). Perhaps inevitably there would be a sound remake in 1935. There had been a remake of the lesser known but still excellent "Alraune" (1928) with Brigette Helm of "Metropolis" fame in 1930 (both which I wrote about here) but otherwise few Expressionist Horror films would get the sound remake treatment. There would be no remake of "The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari" as it was probably considered too weird as well as being vaguely anti-authoritarian and "Nosferatu" had already been made as the American "Dracula" in 1931 while "Der Golem" was out of the question due to it's Jewish themes and setting. "The Student Of Prague" would then be the only such film to be remade in the Nazi era (aside from the partial exception of the version of "The Hound Of The Baskervilles" if that counts) and thus providing a unique chance to compare a classic Weimar silent with a Nazi era remake. This version would have some recognizable names in Anton Walbrook from "I Was Jack Mortimer" and Dorthea Wieck of "Anna Und Elisabeth" and "Madchen In Uniform" directed by Arthur Robison who had directed the 1923 Expressionist psychological film "Warning Shadows".

Rather than recapping the entire plot here I recommend reading the prior article I wrote about the earlier silent versions (which also has the actual full film of course, found here) but to cover the basics the plot revolves around Balduin, the titular student in late 19th century Prague, then part of the Austrian Hapsburg Empire. Balduin is handsome, popular and a champion fencer who has designs on Julia, an attractive & wealthy woman of higher social status played here by Dorthea Wieck. His rival for her affections is Krebs, a friend and fellow student and fencer. At the same time Lydia, a pretty serving maid (Edna Greyff) has a crush on Balduin who likes her but she is of clearly lower social status. Frustrated by his lack of money and status Baldwin is seduced by the promises of Scampinelli, a Svengali type figure who promises he can improve Balduin's prospects through shadowy magical means and Baldin accepts.Balduin than watches horrified but mesmerized as his reflection steps out of a full length mirror and comes to life. The Doppelganger seems to be a version Balduin without a soul or conscience and thus free to pursue Balduin's goals without being restrained by guilt and thus goes on spree of drunken debauchery, cheating at gambling, discarding Lydia to openly pursue Julia and ultimately killing his friend Krebs in a duel even though both had promised the duel would not be fatal. When the real Balduin discovers this he is appalled and confronted by the Doppelganger at first tries to flee but everywhere he turns the Doppelganger is there. Ultimately the Doppelganger returns to the mirror and dares Balduin to shoot him which he does shattering the mirror and his reflection but then he has a heart attack and dies. The story has obvious influences from the classic German fable of "Faust" (which would be made into a film version in 1926 directed by FW Murnau and starring Emil Jannings) along with "Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde" (also made into a now lost 1920 version again by Murnau and starring Veidt) and Oscar Wilde's "The Picture Of Dorian Grey" so it's resonance in Germany was not a surprise and may be why Goebbels gave this film the green light along the the possibility that this story was universal enough to be a potential export product, a goal he never fully gave up on until the start of WW2.

The sound version has some notable differences from the two silent versions (both of which are almost identical in their plots and characters if not film techniques) some of which are more obvious than others.

"THE STUDENT OF PRAGUE" (1935);


Directed by Arthur Robison
CAST;
Anton Wohlbruck  ~  Balduin
Theodor Loos  ~  Dr Carpis
Dorothea Wieck  ~  Julia
Edna Greyff  ~  Lydia
Karl Hellmer  ~  Krebs

One clear difference was that in the original films at least some of the characters appear to be Jewish including a scene where they talk in a Jewish cemetery. This is not a major theme in the film unlike in "Der Golem" which takes place entirely in a Jewish ghetto and the villains are the Austrian Hapsburgs but clearly any Jewish characters at all would be impossible unless they were some sort of lecherous, conniving moneylender, so it's no surprise to find all such traces removed here. Since this was only incidental to the original films this has no effect on the actual story here. More noticable is the change in the character and behavior of Balduin and his Doppelganger. In the silent films the Doppelganger appears as in effect Balduin's Id (to use a Freudian term the filmmakers may or may not have been aware of), capable of carrying out his not-so-secret desires without conscience or restraint. It is the Doppelganger that cruelly discards the devoted but lowly Lydia to pursue the wealthy upper class Julia, it is he that cheats at cards and ultimately kills his friend and rival until the real Balduin, plagued by guilt, rids himself of the interloper and thus destroys himself. This time Balduin himself carries out these acts (sometimes egged on by Scampinelli, especially during the duel) while the Doppelganger seems to be his conscience appearing to haunt him and remind him of his sins until Balduin destroys both. In the silent versions Balduin is horrified by the actions of in what is effect his own dark side which has committed crimes in his name and finally confronts him while in the sound version Balduin is instead appalled by what is in effect his own conscience reminding him of his own sins and it is that he destroys.

s-910-61d7f5
BALDUIN & CARPIS

I don't know if this subtle but real change in focus was intentional or what exactly it says about attitudes in Nazi mythology. In the silent versions Balduin is essentially a passive figure after making the deal with Scampinelli and it is the Doppelganger that commits the crimes which he only later becomes aware of and is horrified by. Unlike Faust who is fully aware of who the Devil is, Balduin does not even fully realize the deal he has made and is thus even less responsible for its ramifications. In the sound remake Balduin himself takes all actions and the Doppelganger appears as his conscience to plague him who he then confronts. Notably in while in silent versions the Doppelganger can and does interact with the real world characters, including killing Balduin's former friend in a duel, here the Doppelganger does not and does not appear to even be visible to anyone other than Balduin and Carpis. Both the silent and sound Balduins end up destroying himself but in doing so the silent versions at least perhaps regain their soul while if the sound version had been prepared to shake of his conscience (which never does more than basically nag him) as so many other Germans did under the Nazis, he would could have simply walked away without real consequences. In death the silent Balduins are also somewhat relieved to have vanquished their dark sides, sound Balduin gets no such release, he dies lamenting his lost innocence but having accomplished nothing.

The character of Scampinelli is also subtly different. In the silent versions he is a clear Mephisto character as in Faust with obvious powers both supernatural (including at one point controlling the weather) and Satanic while the sound version's powers are less overt. Here (remaned Dr Carpis) he is more of a scheming Svengali with some more subtle magical powers who manipulates through lies and temptation. Although the Nazis encouraged a lot of traditional turgid German pseudo-mystical blood & soil Aryan mythological claptrap at the same time Goebbels, and to a certain extent Hitler, were suspicious of and uncomfortable with overt supernatural themes in general and Christian themed ones in particular as distracting from the Nazi personality cult which had to be to a certain extent secular if it were to claim to speak for all Germans while excluding non Germans even if they be Christian. Which led to some cognitive dissonance in Nazi propaganda with the likes of SS leader Himmler spending millions of marks digging up ancient artifacts and party ideologue Alfred Rosenberg writing ponderous books to prove the Aryan's supposed timeless and mystical roots while behind closed doors Goebbels, Goering and sometimes even Hitler sneeringly dismissing Himmler's finds as "dirty shards of pottery" and Rosenberg's books as unreadable drivel. Downgrading Carpis from the divine Mephisto is well within the German Expressionist tradition anyway. Such spider-like manipulative villains were not uncommon in Expressionist films starting with Dr Caligari and continuing to the mad scientists in "Metropolis" and "Alraune" and the master gangster Dr Mabuse and having that character appearing to be a scheming foreigner was certainly acceptable to Nazi sentiment without even needing any supernatural powers. Note that in what was almost certainly a "suggestion" from Goebbels the character's name was changed from Scampinelli, an Italian name since Italy was now Germany's most important ally, to Carpis, often a Jewish name although the character is not explicitly so.

Setting aside the film's themes the addition of sound allowed for and indeed encouraged departures from Expressionist techniques as this film is of course much more talky and thus slower moving than the silent versions. The addition of sound allows the film to do something common in early talkies, add in plenty of music. Here the character of Julia is not a wealthy upper-class heiress but a successful opera singer this allows for her to sing two songs along with a few other numbers which also slow the film down and detract from the claustrophobic atmosphere so essential to Expressionism. Changing Julia from a noblewoman to a singer also changes what she represents from the old aristocracy always viewed by the Nazis with jealousy and suspicion to the kind of celebrities created by the star system they actively encouraged. In fact unlike most of the earlier films we have surveyed here which used music sparingly this film uses lush melodramatic and romantic background music through out with the same soaring strings and blaring horns as in any similar conventional Hollywood which further distances the viewer from the sort of immersive dream world of Expressionism. Whereas the silent versions are horror films this film is more firmly in the already popular and mainstream of historical romances already popular in Germany and prefered by Geobbels and Hitler albeit one apparently set in the Twilight Zone.

image-w1280
BALDWIN & JULIA

Another difference is in the sets which, while up to the high standards of UFA, are realistic and lack the claustrophobic artificiality of the 1926 version. This difference is particularly noticeable in the scenes at the end as Balduin attempts to flee through the city streets at night. The darkened streets here are shadowy enough but lack the menace of the 1926 Expressionist streets and are as pretty as the rest of the film. (Note that these are still clearly artificial sets as at one point Balduin leans against a wall and it can be seen to buckle being likely a painted canvas). The acting is similarly conventional with Anton Walbrook doing a perfectly solid job as Balduin (he is in practically every scene) but he clearly does not compare to the deep emotional turmoil of Conrad Veidt or even Paul Wegener in the silent versions. Similarly the Carpis character here as played by Theodor Loos is different from the character as played by Werner Krause and John Gottowt in being merely maliciously cold and arrogant but lacking their supernatural creepiness. Dorothea Wieck is typically fine in a more conventional role than in "Anna & Elisabeth" or "Madchen In Uniform" but there is another difference in the character of Lydia played here by Edna Greyff. In the silent versions the character once dumped by Balduin takes revenge and it is in fact she who sets up the duel by setting Krebs against Balduin but here she does no such thing and is a completely passive figure mooning loyally but ineffectually over Balduin until the end as befits a proper maiden in Nazi mythology. It's fitting that while in the silent versions she was played by dark haired and exotic actresses this time she is played by the properly blonde and open faced Greyff.

16716612619-8ee0b60032-b
DOROTHEA WIECK

What Goebbels' attitude towards the film was is unknown, but it got poor reviews and was not a success. In his book David Stewart Hull mentions it only in passing but it's worth noting that there would be no further Expressionist remakes under the Nazis. This would also be Arthur Robison's last film as he died suddenly that year. Comparing the silent and sound versions of "The Student Of Prague" show how Expressionism was probably never going to survive the sound era even without the ideological interference of the Nazi censors. Audiences would certainly be happy to accept some Expressionist techniques in an appropriate story as was shown in the most successful films seen here; "Hound Of The Baskervilles", "I Was Jack Mortimer" and "The Student Of Prague" but they also wanted the sort of frothy escapist tropes that would undermine the essential Expressionist nightmare world namely in using a lot of music, lush and essentially realistic sets and costumes and a fair amount of expositional dialogue that removes the mysteries of the earlier era. It is generally acknowledged that Expressionism would leave a heavy influence in Hollywood in the genres of Film Noir and later Sci-Fi and there's no reason to doubt that such an evolution would have happened in German films as well if left to their own devices, in fact the three films just mentioned are perfectly solid genre films with "I Was Jack Mortimer" even being a fine Film Noir and "The Student Of Prague" having the makings of a decent psychological thriller if it had leaned more into it's supernatural themes while "Farman Maria" is clearly superior to the American remake even while having the same director although one suspects non-German audiences would have found it's very European mysticism even more baffling than Germans did and would have prefered the cheesiness of the American version.

Ultimately the very qualities that defined Expressionism as a theory; it's explorations of loneliness and alienation, sexual frustration, temptation and unconvention, the world of nightmares and dreams, and the examination of the darkness of the soul, which many film and cultural historians such as Sigfried Kracauer, Lotte Eisner and Peter Gay have cited as precursors to and warnings of Fascism, were also incompatible with the esthetics of Fascism with it's celebration of conformity and complete surrender of free will to a strongman. Expressionism even with all its darkness which some see as self defeating passivity still allowed for some qualities Fascism will alway see as a threat to its core; unconventionality, guilt and self-reflection. Expressionism was not seen as deeply threatening as Dada, Germany's other great Weimar art and film movement which the Nazis truly hated and did not even try to appropriate, but it turned out to require the messiness of democracy to flourish and eventually it would do so when it made its way to the very non-German and non-European world of Hollywood.

schauspielerin-sybille-schmitz-beyer-122-v-img-16-9-xl-d31c35f8186ebeb80b0cd843a7c267a0e0c81647
SYBILLE SCHMITZ

Tuesday, 4 October 2022

Halloween/Yom Kippur Special - "The Dybbuk"; A Yiddish Horror Film


Dybuk1937-1

In the early years of film from the silent era to the early talkies there were the major powers; the United States, France, Russia, Germany, Italy, maybe Britain plus Sweden and Denmark, the film output of which is well known and documented. Then there's the second rank of smaller powers, largely outside the West, usually smaller and/or less wealthy, such as China and Japan, India, some Latin American countries and countries in Eastern Europe including Finland and the Baltics (which I wrote about last month), Romania and Greece that made some interesting films that may have gone unnoticed in the outside world but offer a look at different cultures adapting to the new medium. Among these are the Yiddish films mostly made in Russia in the twenties and Poland in the thirties.

Setting aside the "Assimilated" who may have lived in Jewish neighbourhoods but otherwise were fully integrated into the larger non-Jewish societies in which they lived, speaking the local languages (German, French, English), doing business and attending the same theatres as Gentiles, the Jewish communities in Europe fell into two categories; the Ghetto, neighbourhoods in large cities, and the Shtetl, farm villages in rural areas. The population in the Ghettos ranged from ultra Orthodox Hasidic who never left the area and barely interacted with outsiders to the more secular who had business, political, personal and artistic relations with the larger gentile society while the Shtetl were Orthodox, conservative and insular. Both groups used Yiddish as their main language day-to-day if not exclusively and this was reflected in their theatres, media and music. From the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries virtually every mid-to-large city in central Europe and North America had at least one large Yiddish theatre holding regular programs of plays, comedies and musicals entirely in Yiddish with big and loyal audiences. In North America a circuit of Yiddish theatres ran separate from the regular vaudeville circuit with the names such as the Marx Bros, Ritz Bros, Edward G Robinson (real name Emanuel Goldenberg), Paul Muni (Fredrick Meirer Weisenfreund), George Gershwin (Jacob Gershvin), Al Jolson (Asa Yoelson) and Eddie Cantor (Isadore Itzkowitz) getting their start in Yiddish theatre before crossing over to Vaudeville, Broadway and Hollywood. However when a Yiddish film industry began it would happen in Europe, which had a less integrated society and a smaller film industry. A small but quite active Yiddish film industry sprang up, originally centered in Russia which had a large European Jewish community, both Ghetto and Shtetls combined but after the Great War and Russian Revolution much of the action moved to the by then independent Poland which had the largest Jewish population in Europe outside the USSR.

Dybbuk1920-1
DYBBUK POSTER

The vast majority of the plays shown in Yiddish theatres were fairly lighthearted fare being various comedies, romances and musicals dealing with life either in the urban Ghetto or small town Shtetl and early Yiddish films would continue this tradition with the first silents being comedies of various types. The most important of which were "Jewish Luck" (Yiddish name "Idishe Glikn") made in Russia in 1925 about a petty dreamer with various get rich quick schemes which was adopted from a play written by Sholem Aleichem who also wrote the original "Fiddler On The Roof" and "Laughter Through Tears" (AKA "Durkh Trennan", 1928) about a boy trying to find ways to support his family. Both films are still extant with the latter film in a version that was clumsily dubbed after sound films came in a few years later.

While the bulk of these films seem pretty similar in consisting mostly of gentle comedies and musicals one film was notable for its darker and more mystical themes and more artistic visuals influenced by German Expressionism even leaving it be be considered the first (and last) Yiddish supernatural horror film; "The Dybbuk" in 1937. The title character of "The Dybbuk" was a creature from Jewish mythology who was a shape-shifting spirit who could take possession of a human body. The dybbuk was a fairly obscure figure until popularized by a modern Russian/Jewish writer.

FSjt-p3-XIAIo-E-k
DYBBUK POSTER

Shloyme Zaynvi Rapoport (1863-1920) who often wrote under the name S Ansky was born in Russia where he was busy as a writer, literary critic and folklorist writing in both Russian and Yiddish. He was also a member of the radical Socialist Revolutionary Party who were rivals of the Bolsheviks and like many other radicals he spent much of the 1900's in exile (including Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky) in France and Switzerland where he continued to write articles and edit publications in Russian, Yiddish and French. He returned to Russia after the abortive 1905 Revolution after getting a pardon (as he was in exile and not directly involved) and returned to writing and lecturing. His fiction works covered a range of subjects from novels and plays about traditional Yiddish subjects and settings to modern plays (covertly published) that advocated for Marxist revolution. "The Dybbuk" was written in 1913 as a play and was not his only work dealing with the supernatural (he also wrote another play and some poems based on similar themes sometimes referred to as Yiddish Gothic) but it was not exactly representative of the bulk of his voluminous writings much of which was either scholarly or revolutionary. It was, however his most successful and influential play being staged in Russia as well as other parts of Europe and even making it's way to America. However he would not live to see much of this success as the Great War intervened.

An-ski-1910
SHLOYME RAPOPORT (Alias S ANSKY)

Although his play had been written in 1913 it had not yet been actually staged having been delayed by the war until 1917 when it was scheduled to be performed only to have it's debut delayed once again by the chaos of the Russian Revolution and Civil War. In the first phase of the 1917 Russian Revolution, which he of course supported, he was elected to the first Russian Assembly as a representative of the Socialist Revolutionaries but after the Bolshevik takeover later that year he would flee first to the now independent Lithuania then Poland where he resumed his writing and trying to get his play staged before dying suddenly of a heart attack in 1920 aged only 57. Only months after his death would his play finally be staged, first in Warsaw and then in the Soviet Union in 1922. The first film based on the play would be produced in 1925 in the USSR (now lost) with the classic version made in Poland in 1937 by which time sound films had arrived to Poland.

8fd811-811a8818a21445358b6db1c9549c7eca-mv2
THE ORIGINAL 1920 POLISH PLAY

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"THE DYBBUK" (1937);


Directed by Michal Waszynski
From the play by Shloyme Zaynvi Rapoport as "S. Ansky"

CAST;
Mojzesz Lipman ~ Sender Brynicer Ben Henie
Lili Liliana ~ Leah Sender
Leon Liebgold ~ Channon Ben Nisan
Gerszon Lemberger ~ Nisan Ben Rifke (father of Chanan)
Ajzyk Samberg ~ Meszulach The Messenger (or Seer)
Abraham Morewski ~ Rabbi Azeriel Ben Hodos
Dina Halprin ~ Aunt Frade
Samuel Landau ~ Zalman the Matchmaker
Max Bozyk ~ Nute

Plot synopsis (spoiler alert);
Set in the shtetl of Brinitz in 1800's Russian Pale of Settlement (the area where Jews were largely restricted to, stretching from parts of eastern Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine and western Russia) two friends Sender a Rabbi and Nisan a fisherman make a vow that the children their wives are expecting will eventually marry. They are interrupted by Meszulach, a dark and mysterious travelling seer who warns them against making promises that bind future generations. In the event Sender's wife dies giving birth to their daughter Leah, and at the same time Nisan drowns in a storm at the moment his wife gives birth to their son Channon. Eighteen years later Sender becomes a rich but miserly rabbi, and one day Channon arrives there as a poor yeshiva student to study and Sender offers him lodging while both men are unaware of their connection. Channon has been followed by the Meszulach who appears and fades away is if by magic. He introduces Channon to Sender but does not reveal their secret past to either man. Leah and Channon fall in love, but keep this a secret knowing that Sender will not agree to marriage because of his lack of wealth. Leah shows Channon a grave righ in the town square and tells him it is for a young couple who were murdered on their wedding day and the town center is where wedding recptions so that they may honour the young lovers. Sender tries to make a deal with Zamlan the Matchmaker to find Leah a suitable rich husband with Nachman for his son Menasze but he drives too hard of a dowry bargain and returns home empty handed except for some cattle he bought from Nachman. He finds Leahs singing a song that had only been known by his old friend Nisan. When he asks where she learned the song she tells him she learned it from Chammon whose father had drowned and Sender then realizes Chammon must be the lost son of Nisan to whom he vowed to wed his daughter. As he ponders this Zalman the matchmaker runs in and tells him that Nachman has agreed to his dowry terms and the marriage can go ahead. Sender disregards his vow to Nisan and agrees to the marriage of Leah and Menasze.    

rehearsing-the-dybbuk-2

Channon obsessively studies the Kabbalah and attempts to practice magic to stop the marriage and win Leah's hand. When he hears that Sender has arranged Leah's marriage to a rich man's son, he does a rite and calls on Satan to help him but he's struck dead. His friend Nute wanted to warn him but is told by Meszulach that Channon must be allowed to find his own way. After Chammon is buried Leah visits his grave where she is met by Meszulach who tells her about the Dybbuk spirit Chammon had invoked but she does not believe him and prays for him to return. During a bridal celebration dance Leah has a vision of the undead spirit of Chammon who dances with her. As the long wedding ceremony goes on Chammon's spirit rises from the cemetery. Leah breaks away from the wedding vow and throws herself on the grave of the lost lovers in the town square and calls upon Chammon to rescue her. As it starts to rain Meszulach announces that she has been possessed by the Dybbuk. The next day Sender and her Aunt take her to a Rabbinical Council in Miropol for advice. Meszulach is already there and he denounces Sender for his greed and selfishness. The head Rabbi Azeriel also blames Sender who admits he has broken his vow to Nisan. Azeriel convenes a Rabbinical trial in which Senders is found guilty of breaking his vow to Nisan and after accepting judgement is forgiven any punishment allowing the wedding of his daughter to go ahead after Azeriel declares the vow voided. However Meszulach who has attended the trial announces that Nisan does not accept the verdict and the Dybbuk has not departed from Leah's body. Azeriel agrees to perform an exorcism to cast out the Dybbuk and after a ceremony in the Temple she collapses and Azeriel declares the Dybbuk has been exorcised and leaves along with his Rabbis and Sender leaving Leah alone in the Temple. She awakens to Chammon's voice calling to her telling her he has left her body but calls her to join him in the afterlife as his bride. She agrees and collapses on the altar where she is soon found dead by Sender. Meszulach witnessing this declares judgement has been rendered and blows out a candle as the wind blows closed the pages of a holy book. Finis.

images

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This film stands out from the usual musical and comedy fare of Yiddish films not only in its supernatural and horror themes but also in its artistic ambitions with obvious influences taken from German Expressionism. This can clearly be seen in the hallucinogenic bridal dance scene where the Dybbuk takes the form of Death and dances with Leah. But there are other signs of Expressionist influence particularly in the sets. The town square conjures up the ghetto in Paul Wegener's classic "Der Golem" (itself based on another Jewish mythical creature) if less ramshackle and cluttered while the cemetery, with it's ricketty headstones, all of which appear to be crooked, and the large headstone in the center of town reminds one of the cemeteries in "The Student Of Prague" (1913 with Wegener again and 1926 with Conrad Veidt) and FW Murnau's "Nosferatu". These sets are clearly artificial indoor sets as was standard in the early German Expressionist film although there are scenes on the road that are outdoor shots. The film doesn't make excessive use of Expressionist tropes of shadows, isolated pools of light and stairways going nowhere aside from the conjuring scene which does bring to mind Murnau's "Faust" (1926). Some of the acting employs exaggerated Expressionist gestures, especially among the extras and crowd scenes of various figures standing around staring wide-eyed and open mouthed and during the well edited back-and-forth action during the conjuring scene as a dance is going on while we see a fine shot of Sender sitting all alone and imperious as if on a throne but surrounded by darkness.

tumblr-ll41blq-Lg-H1qaphz7o1-500

Director Michal Waszynski came about his Expressionist influences honestly as he had started out as an assistant director to none other than FW Murnau. Later he would return to a by then independent Poland and become the most prolific film maker in Poland with over thirty films to his credit. In fact he was so ubiquitous that it was estimated, not entirely in jest, that he worked on fully a quarter of the films made in pre WW2 Poland. Ironically, although secular Jewish by heritage with a good working knowledge of Jewish traditions and the Yiddish language by the time of this most classic of Jewish films was made in 1937 he had actually become a Catholic convert. As for Expressionist influences however it's notable that in the surviving stills from the 1920's stage play suggest that it was already seen as an Expressionist presentation and one must remember that Expressionism had started out as a theater movement before graduating to the screen and such figures as FW Muranu himself and started in the theater as had Paul Wegener and Conrad Veidt among others.

FKcnicy-Xw-AQRTc-M
SCENE FROM THE 1920'S STAGE VERSION

This film and play are sometimes somewhat facetiously referred as the only examples of a genre called Yiddish Gothic but they could also be termed Yiddish Expressionism. Speaking of Gothic it's no doubt a coincidence but the theme of a girl being possessed by a demon would be revisited in 1973 classic "The Exorcist", however it's worth noting that the latter film made in the cynical seventies actually has the more positive ending as the demon is cast out and the girl is saved while in the "Dybbuk" the girl dies. On the other hand it was also a fate she chose rather than be saddled in a marriage arranged by her father for clear mercenary reasons to a man she (or for that matter the viewer) does not even know.  

tumblr-f4f5ae9c4652dc42efe5da2435c4f5b3-2e78b781-500

One obvious difference between this film and German Expressionism is it's frequent musical numbers. This is partly because German Expressionism as a film genre (as opposed to it's stage version) was of course a silent film genre but it's also a byproduct of the Yiddish Theatre where musicals were not only popular but ubiquitous much like Bollywood today and audiences would expect music as a matter of course. In the event there are more than a half dozen musical numbers in the film depending on how you want to count them however almost all of them are done in context, as in the song is something the characters would actually be doing such as the wedding dances, religious songs or women singing while they work unlike in Hollywood or Bollywood musicals where musical numbers stop the action while characters break out in song or a big production number then snap back and return to the script which in this case helps to maintain the film's moody and fantastical atmosphere. This dreamlike feel is also enhanced by it's portraying a culture and world very foreign to most modern viewers although it would obviously have been less so to some of its original audience.    

3fgx880-P5c-OOSl-M6-A1uty-P6l-Rqyd-Hj-ZARho-Oflco
COURTYARD SET FROM THE 1920'S PLAY

While director Michal Waszynski did have plenty of worthwhile experience as well as an artistic and aesthetic vision the film is not without its flaws. Like many early talkies it's slow moving in getting to it's climax, spends a lot of time with characters standing around talking and probably could have done with some more judicious editing. The many musical numbers also slow things down somewhat. The acting is uneven with some cast members (who mostly came from the Yiddish theatre world) notably Lili Liliana (Leah), Leon Liebgold (Channon), Mojzesz Lipman (Sender) and Abraham Morewski (Azeriel) doing perfectly credible jobs while others such as Ajzyk Samberg (Meszulach) and some of the extras, being stiff and wooden or awkward. This is also common in the early Hollywood talkies.

habima-dybbuk-act2-b
INTERIOR SET FROM THE 1920's PLAY

Essentially this film resembles the films made in the first couple years of the sound era in Hollywood from about 1929 to 1931. It's worth remembering that sound films came to Eastern Europe a few years later than in Hollywood or the large nations of Western Europe meaning filmmakers there would need a couple years to catch up to the new methods and figure out how to direct and tell stories in the new medium so even though it was made in 1937 by Hollywood standards it should probably be seen as roughly equal to a film of about 1931 or 32 which is the timeframe of the classic "Dracula" or the German film "M".

EQET

For a film made in Poland with a Jewish cast just before the Nazis came one might naturally fear about the ultimate fates of it's director and cast but somewhat miraculously most of them managed to avoid the Holocaust. Director Waszynski was in Poland when the Germans invaded but he quickly fled east and ended up in the zone occupied by the Soviets to whom he quickly offered his services as a filmmaker and they, always quick to recognize the importance of film as agit-prop put him to work as a theatre director. Before he had the chance to actually make any films for them however the Nazis invaded the USSR and he took the opportunity to escape and join up with the Free Polish Army in the west who were opposed to the Soviets where he would make a film documentary about their fighting in the invasion of Italy. Of course the Free Poles would lose out to the Soviets and he would never return home but ever the survivor he made his way to Italy and eventually Hollywood where he would carry on a successful career as a producer on such major productions as "The Quiet American" (1958), "El Cid" (1961) and "The Fall Of The Roman Empire" (1964) before dying of a sudden heart attack in 1968 aged 60. Lili Liliana (Leah) and Leon Liebgold (Chammon) would actually become a married couple and were touring in America when the war started and they would stay there working mostly in the Yiddish theatre scene with Lili dying in 1989 at the age of 76 while Liebgold would serve in the US Army then also return to the stage where both would have respected careers until he died in 1993 aged 83. They were buried in New York, far from their native Poland but together as in the film.

FPuoe-Zk-Xw-AAZPsr-1
MICHAL WASZYNSKI & LILI LIANNA

Abraham Morewski (Azreiel) survived the war in the Soviet Union to afterwards return to Poland where he returned to the stage becoming an award winning actor and writer dying in 1964. Mojzesz Lipman (Sender) also survived and returned to Poland where he worked as a writer director at least until 1948 when he apparently retired and dropped out of sight. Dina Halprin (Aunt Frade) would also end up in New York where she would have her own respected stage career, dying in 1989. Max Bozyk (Chammon's friend Nute) was yet another who ended up in New York. He had also appeared in two other important Yiddish films "Yidl With His Fiddle" (1936) and "Klies Chaf" (AKA "The Vow" or "A Rabbi's Power", 1937) and would continue his career in Argentina and New York where he died in 1970. Inevitably however some where not so lucky. Samuel Landau (Zalman the Matchmaker) had been acting in film since 1913 including in the same other two films as Bozyk. Trapped in the Warsaw Ghetto he would continue to perform but there would be no escape from the Ghetto where he died in 1942. Ajzyk Samberg (Meszulach the Seer) was caught up by the Nazis and transported to a concentration camp where he reportedly also put on performances for the other inmates until he was murdered by the Nazis in 1943.    

dybbuk-slide-3-yiddish

NOTE; The version of this film that most people are familiar with, and the one currently available on Youtube and the Internet Archive, is taken from an old print from the 30's or 40's which is very poor quality both visually and audibly (although it does have English subtitles clearly added around the time of release presumably for a limited American showing) which has given a mistaken impression that this film was more crude than was actually the case at the time of release. But I recently stumbled on a version which has been restored to pristine visual condition and makes it clear that this film was up to contemporary standards of Hollywood and Western Europe so I've uploaded it and it can now be viewed as the filmmakers intended in all its Yiddish Gothic glory. This must be a seperate print from the other as the contemporary English subtitles are gone although someone has added new Spanish subtitles. If you can't pick your way through the Spanish I suggest watching the film twice as I did, once using the poor quality print with English subtiles to get the story and again using the better quality print to see the full visual clarity.  

  MV5-BZjg2-ZGQ4-ZDAt-Mjc2-YS00-NDcy-LWFm-NTkt-Yj-Y4-Zj-Aw-Zm-Y0-Nz-Ji-Xk-Ey-Xk-Fqc-Gde-QXVy-Njg3-MTIw-ODI-V1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The status of "The Dybbuk" as the greatest Yiddish film meant it would inevitably be rediscovered and remade and it would eventually be done in English as a made for TV production directed by no less a name than Sidney Lumet.

"THE DYBBUK" (1960);


Directed by Sidney Lumet
CAST;
Theodor Bikel ~ Sender
Carol Lawrence ~ Leah Sender
Michael Tolan ~ Channon
Vincent Gardenia ~ Nissen
Ludwig Donath ~ Rabbi Azriel
Milton Selzer ~ Meszulach the Seer
Sylvia Davis ~ Aunt Frade

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This was done for a TV series called "Play Of The Week", one of the many anthology shows in the early days of TV with this one having a more artistic bent which included plays by Ibsen, Ben Jonson, Truman Capote, Arch Obler and Mel Brooks. Sidney Lumet had by this time already been nominated for a Oscar for "12 Angry Men" (1957) and as he points out in the intro his father had acted in a stage version in the 1930's so he was no doubt serious and treated this as a work of literature rather than a film. While the 1937 film had influnces from German Expresionism and Yiddish musicals which makes for an unique film Lumet considered himself a Realist who reject such fantasy worlds and this version is simply a stage version which happens to be filmed. It is thus very stagebound with a few spartan sets, all indoors, that have no paticular style, it is also very slow moving. While the 1937 film had some slow patches this one is downright glacial and frankly boring with most of the time taken up by characters standing or sitting around talking. The 1937 film, while not exactly a musical, did have several musical numbers as was was typical of Yiddish theatre at the time while the 1960 version is largely without music which is a little ironic since Lumet himself mentions the importance of music to the culture in his intro. The play clocks in at two hours which was a long time for a TV show in 1960 which also shows how seriously this project was taken but it's really too long. The dialogue is realistic and well acted with a cast made up of prominant stage actors. Theadore Bikel was a respected actor and Carol Lawrence having been nominated for a Tony for "West Side Story" (1957). Also along was a then young character actor Vincent Gardenia. Note while Lumet and most of the cast were Jewish, Lawrence and Gardenia were actually Italian Americans. This 1960's version largely dispenses with the supernatural/occult themes of the 1937 version which by 1960 were probably seen by the educated worldly Lumet and a possible audience as being a little undignified and more suited to a B-Movie horror flick and a distraction from Lumet's attempt to present a literate and humanized portrayal of a culture that he obviously respected to the larger modern secular gentile audience. Ironically dispensing with the Expressionsit smoke & ghostly spirits of the 1937 version means that the departed spirit of Nisan is never actually seen and is instead played by the dissembodied voice of Vincent Gardenia and Carol Lawrence has to play her possession scenes by spinning around, mouth agape with her hands waving in the air before collapsing in a heap both of which might have worked on a small stage but looks inadvertantly silly here. The TV version also lackes entirely the moody Gothic/Expressionist atmospherics of the 1937 film which might have seemed a little corny in 1960 but have dated better than Lumet's wordy melodramatic realism at least in this case. The 1960 version is sincere, has some good dialogue, is well acted and has historical value as being possibly the first portrait of Hasidic culture on mainstream American TV but as a viewing experience it can be safely missed and the 1937 version is vastly better and far more watchable.

images-3

As an odd footnote the original play and films were popular enough that they inspired a puppet show version which, assuming it were filmed, has sadly not survived aside from a poster and an intriguing still.

Modicut-Dybbuk-Parody

1930's PUPPET SHOW VERSION

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Besides the 1937 film there was a previous Yiddish film which utilized some of the same themes from the original Rappaport's 1922 play as a silent film made in Poland in 1924.

"TKIES-KAF" (AKA "THE VOW" or "A Vilna Legend" or "The Rabbi's Power", 1924);


Directed by Zygmunt Turkow
From a play by Peretz Hirschbein

CAST;
Zygmunt Turkow ~ Elijah The Prophet
Ida Kaminska ~ Rachel Kornberg
Esther-Rokhi Kaminska ~ Mrs Kornberg
Simcha Balanoff ~ Jacob Mandel
Moshe Litman ~ Baruch Mandel
Lev Mogilov ~ Schmuhl Levine
Henryk Tarlo ~ Levine Jr
Adam Domb ~ Chaym Kornberg
David Ledermen ~ Matchmaker
Jonas Turkow ~ Yeshiva Student
Joseph Buloff ~ The Narrator

Plot Synopsis (Spoiler Alert); In the turn of the century Lithuanian capital of Vilna a group of Hasidic men gather in a tavern. One of them proceeds to tell a story about Elijah, a prophet who wanders from place to place taking the disguises of various figures to influence the affairs of men. In the story Elija comes to Vilna in the form of a wandering beggar. He finds a local Rabbi who is giving advice to the locals. Two of his visitors, merchants Chaym Kronberg and Baruch Mandel are married but childless and the Rabi assures them they will have children when God wills it and they leave. Chaym and Baruch are friends and they share their troubles making a vow that if they do have a son and daughter they will marry them to each other. Elijah witnesses this vow although the two men do not know who he is. Twenty years later Chayam has had a daughter and Baruch a son, however they have lost contact as Mandel has moved away to a town in the country while Kronberg stayed in Vilna where his now poor family are struggling, we learn that Chaym has since died and his ailing wife and daughter have been reduced to selling fruit in the street, taking in washing and working as seamstresses. The couple also had a son who went off to war. Before he died Chaym made a loan to a Russian General by taking valuable jewels as collateral and hiding them in a secret place for safekeeping. One day a telegram arrives informing the family that their son has died in action and after reading the telegram Chaym has a heart attack and dies as well. When the General returns to reclaim his jewels Mrs Kronberg does not know where Chaym had hidden them and to repay the losses she must sell the home and business to another wealthy merchant, Schmuhl Levine thus reducing the family to poverty. Meanwhile Baruch Mandel is a wealthy merchant living in another town and is preparing to send his son Jacob off to Yeshiva school in the city to study. Elijah, still in the disguise of a wandering holy prophet visits and when Baruch asks his advice as to where he should send his son to live within the city he suggests Schmuhl Levine and Baruch agrees. Jacob arrives in Vilna and finds Levine who invites him to stay with his family which includes his own son who is of similar age. Jacob however is sober, religious and studious while Levine's son is worldly, secular, dresses in expensive clothes and likes to drink and smoke. Jacob sees Rachel who he does not know and who lives nearby in a small apartment across a courtyard with her sick mother. As Jacob studies in his room while Rachel and her mother are working on their sewing an old Beggar appears in the courtyard and begins singing for alms. Rachel and Jabob both hear him and toss him some coins. The Beggar blesses them and then vanishes into thin air. Later Jacob is studying at Yeshiva school Rachel and her mother arrive selling apples. Jacob and other students are smitten with Rachel who gives them free apples when they can not afford to pay. Jacob becomes obsessed with Rachel and can not focus on his studies. He dreams and begins to have visions. First as himself and Rachel together in Biblical times. Next two of his school friends come in and act as good and evil spirits. The evil one tempts him by taking him to a burlesque show while the good one takes him to the cemetery where they visit the tomb of the great Ribi of Vilna where he is then locked in. Jacob then wakes up and hallucinates again before returning to his room and going to bed sick. Meanwhile Rachel goes to sell fruit to Schmuhl Levine who is now living in their old house and who has just stumbled on to the Chaym's old hidden cache of jewels. When Rachel shows up Levine, who is much older than Rachel, makes a pass at her and she flees as his son enters. Later Levine Jr has a party and as the merriment carries on Jacob arrives and is invited to stay and does so, captivated by the women there he shyly removes his Hasidic hat. Afterwards Levine Jr gives him a makeover in which Jacob sheds his long Hasidic hair locks. Jacob, now in his new secular clothes borrowed from Levine Jr, Jacob runs into Rachel and the two go off on a walk together. Schmuhl sees them together and notices they are attracted to each other plots to prevent their relationship. He goes to the local Matchmaker and hires him to go to Mrs Kornberg to negotiate a marriage with her daughter. As the Matchmaker is discussing the matter with Mrs Kornberg, Rachel arrives and when told of the marriage proposal from Levine she angrily refuses and storms out. The Matchmaker reports this to Levine who blames her reluctance on the presence of Jacob and he plots to have him removed by writing to Mr Mandel and telling him Jacob has been backsliding in his studies and living a sinful life. Baruch arrives as Jacob is getting dance lessons with Levine Jr and a woman and he furiously orders him to pack his things and return home which he does after writing a goodbye note to Rachel and leaving it with Levine Jr who delivers it to her. She runs after him but is too late. Later Baruch has arranged a proper marriage for Jacob with the daughter of a wealthy merchant and we see him at the wedding reception having returned to wearing his Hasidic clothes. At the signing of the wedding contract Baruch has second thoughts remembering the vow he made to Chaym twenty years earlier but he goes through with signing the contract. During the pre-wedding feast Jacob sits alone depressed over his marriage and missing Rachel. The next day as Baruch heads out to make more wedding arrangements he is warned not to go by a stranger who accosts him on the street and warns him from going but he brushes the stranger off and as he does so the stranger changes form to Elijah and fades away without Baruch noticing. his journey is next interrupted as his horse stops and refuses to go as the invisible form of Elijah is holding the horse's bridle. Angrilly Baruch runs off on foot but misses his train and instead falls and injures himself and is brought home. Baruch is plagued by bad luck forcing him to sell some of his businesses which include a lumber yard and while he is showing it to a perspective but he is almost struck by a falling tree and is convinced he has seen the woodcutter before. The falling tree killed a bird who had been in her nest and unseen by Baruch the woodcutter scoops her up and breathes life into the bird before changing form back into Elijah and disappearing.

image-w1280

That night as Baruch is sleeping he is visited by the spirit of Chyam who reminds him of his vow to marry his son Jacob to his daughter rachel. Suddenly Baruch is woken by the news that a forest fire has broken out and he has to flee but as he does he sees a vision of himself and Chaym making their vow for their children's marriage and he collapses. Meanwhile the Matchmaker has returned to the Kornbergs to convince Rachel to marry Levine. Again she refuses as she is waiting for Jacob to return so the Matchmaker shows her the news that Jacob is to be wed and she collapses. With Rachel depressed and refusing to leave her bed Levine hires a doctor to examine her and he prescribed time in the country air so Levine pays to send her to a country sanitorium to recover where he follows and again proposes marriage and this time she wearily agrees. Mother and Daughter visit Chaym's grave to pray for guidance and help. That night Rachel dreams that the spirits from the cemetery rise from their graves and come to dance at her wedding where Jacob appears as her groom only to suddenly turn into Levine and she awakes screaming that she will never marry Levine. Baruch has returned home and deciding he must stop the wedding he rushes off to Vilna. Jacob arrives home where he is told by his mother about Rachel's wedding but not that his father has rushed off to try and stop it. On the wedding day Rachel is depressed while Levine throws a wedding feast which Elijah attends now in the disguise of a wealthy merchant. Levine invites him to stay and the Chief Rabbi recognizes him as being a holy man. As the wedding is about to start Baruch arrives and stops it telling everyone about his vow with Chaym. Jacob rushes in and insists he has the right to marry Rachel and Elijah says their wedding is blessed dismissing Levine and the wedding guests who meekly comply leaving Rachel and Jacob alone with Mrs Kornberg, Baruch and the Rabbi. That night Elijah visits Levine in a vision and orders him to give the jewels to the Rabbi so he can return them to Mrs Mrs Kornberg. Elijah and the Rabbi visit the Kornbergs who are at home with Jacoba and Baruch and return the jewels then Elijah vanishes. The Rabbi now realizes who Elijah actually was and Baruch many of the men he had met who had tried to influence him to keep his vow (the Woodcutter, a coachman etc) were all actually Elijah in disguise. He is relieved to have kept his vow and gives his full blessing to the wedding of Rachel and Jacob. Elijah is shown returning to his true form as an old wandering beggar and leaving Vilna. We return to the men in the tavern as the Narrator finishes the story. Finis.  

vilna-legend-01
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While this film shares some obviously similar themes to "The Dybbuk" and can also be considered an example of Yiddish Gothic there are some notable differences. While "The Dybbuk", at least the film version, is essentially a supernatural Gothic romance with religious undertones "The Vow" is a religious film with supernatural Gothic romance undertones, thus the focus is different as is the intent. "The Dybbuk" is Gothic and fatalistic, "The Vow" is conservative and reassuring. "The Vow" is presented from the start as a religious parable about the importance of keeping a sacred vow and a virtuous religious life with the main supernatural character being a Biblical prophet with a clear moral message. The message here is clear and even simplistic; Chaim and Baruch made a sacred vow in the presence of Elijah the Prophet and so Baruch must keep his word even if the original vow was impulsive and not well thought out or for that matter entirely fair since it's not Baruch's fault that Chaim moved away and lost contact and further neither man could know the were making the vow in the presence of Elijah in the first place since he was in disguise. Still keeping the vow is clearly in the best interest of the Kornbergs and it's obviously what Jacob wants so while Elijah may be taking things a little literally he's doing what's right in the end. By contrast in "The Dybbuk" Chamon summoning a demon to win over a bride even unto death seems a little obsessive if not stalkerish. In "The Vow" the Chief Rabbi recognizes who Elijah is and defers to him in maintaining community standards while in "The Dybbuk" the Chief Rabbi fails to fully understand the true nature of the spirit and thus fails in his exorcism. Note the subtitle of this film as "A Rabbi's Power" is a little ironic as he clearly is not the main power here, however well intentioned.

12-3-L-vilna-elijah-0527
ELIJAH MEETS THE RABBIS

This film itself has an odd history. Originally filmed in 1924 Poland by actor/director Zygmunt Turkow, who also appeared in it as Elijah, as a silent. Like other Yiddish films it probably made its way to other European countries with substantial urban Jewish communities such as Germany, Romania and eventually America as well. By the sound era in 1933 American Jewish director George Roland re-released it as a sound version with a new voice-over narration in Yiddish by actor Joseph Buloff as well as adding English subtitles, removing the original Yiddish intertitles and changed the title to "A Vilna Legend". He may have also made some other edits but more importantly he also filmed new opening and closing framing sequences being those set in the tavern with the men sitting around while one (Buloff) tells the story and narrates while the others act as Greek chorus periodically throughout the film. These scenes were seemingly added to make the film more relatable to modern American Jewish viewers who may have found the mystical imagery old-fashioned. By doing so however this has the effect of undermining those themes by removing the viewer from the story somewhat by presenting it not as a immersive fantasy, as most Gothic and Expressionist films are, and instead as a story told by a narrator who is not entirely reliable as he is clearly telling a tall-tale fable. The obvious comparison is the 1920 German film "The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari" where director Robert Wiene (apparently prodded by the studio) added opening and closing scenes which many thought changed and even undermined the supernatural and political themes of the script by framing the entire story as a tale told by a clearly unreliable narrator, in that case an inmate in an asylum.

12-4-L-vilna-mother-daughter-0527

The new narration by Roland actually takes the religious message and imagery and makes it more preachy as it strains to point out how Jacob has "taken the first step" towards sin by first shedding his hasidic clothes and then his long hair-locks before (gasp of horror) taking dancing lessons, and from a woman no less. Clearly Roland was not prepared to risk having the viewer figure this out themselves but he may have gone further than Tutkow's original version intended. In Roland's voiceover the character of Levine's son is explicitly presented as lapsed, sinful and a bad influence of Jacob pointing out that he "never prays" and prefers to smoke and party with girls (gasp again) and when Levine makes a pass at the much younger Rachel, the Narrator sniffly says he is "like father like son". However that is not really fair to him as in the actual film we see Levine treats Jacob quite well. In the beginning when his cronies mock Jacob's provincial ways he dismisses them and takes him home, he includes him in his fun, doesn't mock him, when Jacob is summoned home he packs for him and when entrusted with a letter for Rachel he does deliver it and when Levine Sr makes a pass at Rachel it is Levine Jr who interrupts so saying he is "like father like son" is just wrong. He may be a frivolous adolescent who would rather party than study but he is a loyal friend to Jacob. Somewhat inconsistently at the end when Jacob rushes off to stop Rachel's wedding, by which time he had already been dragged home by his father for lapsing from the Hasidic ways, he is still wearing his fashionable secular clothes although in the end he has changed back. The original film is not shy in using other obvious religious imagery as when Jacob is shown being tempted and distracted from his studies by Rachel literally using an apple as if she were Eve in the Garden Of Eden.  

2ave-3065-large
RACHEL VISITS JACOB AT THE SCHOOL

At any rate besides making these changes Roland also changed the opening credits naming himself as sole director and snubbing Turkow entirely which was rather unethical and probably legally actionable by Turkow even in the somewhat lax copyright laws of the era, unless Roland purchased the full rights to the film. Making changes to silent films, even substantial ones, was not unusual at the time, "Metropolis" is a case in point, and once the the sound era began the most silent films became worthless so doing so with a film with such a specific audience would not be that unusual, although taking a full directors credit is another matter. This is assuming Turkow even fully knew about it at the time. However in 1933 he was still in Poland where he would remain until the Nazis invaded in 1939 when he was able to flee to Brazil. After the war he moved to Israel where he continued his stage career so if he ever heard about the 1933 rerelease and its changes he may have felt it not worth pursuing especially for a film using by then obsolete technology and for an inherently limited audience. In addition in 1937 while still in Poland, Tutkow himself did a completely remade sound version (also in Yiddish) to good reviews which still survives. The 1937 version (in which he again cast himself as Elijah) somewhat mutes the supernatural themes in favour of focussing on the more conventional romance. Ironically after all this long and winding road the print now extant has lost it's voiceover soundtrack while stll having the added scenes and subtitles so in the end the film now survives as a silent anyway.

2ave-1793-large

Visually the film is pretty conventional for the most part but it does has a few nicely Gothic and Expressionist touches as the dead rising from their graves wrapped in prayer shawls to descend on the wedding is classically Gothic and the scene where Jacob is taken to a fantasy burlesque to be tempted by dancing girls could almost be from an early German "Street Film" if it had been done with a bit more flair, while the scene with Jacob being lured to the cemetery and locked in could come from one of Victor Seastrom's Swedish films. There are a couple attempts at comedy as well (both oddly involving food) that are at odds with the tone of the rest of the film. There are a few other scenes with Elijah appearing and vanishing which are echoed in "The Dybbuk" in the Messenger character. The cemetery doesn't have the Expressionist moodiness of "The Dybbuk" and in fact none of the sets are especially noteworthy unlike in classic Expressionist films and are instead presented more or less realistically. Director Turkow did not have the same experience as "Dybbuk" director Waszynski or for that matter even George Roland, in fact this would be his first film and he would only direct one more as well as acting in three others but he may not have the experience or esthetic vision as one working in a decade earlier in a new medium, he does an effective job here and most of the clunkier aspects of the story telling are really the result of changes made by Roland.

vilnalegend2

Like "The Dybbuk"  this film was based on a play although often compared to the better known latter film with which it shares some obvious similarities "The Vow"  was in fact older both as a film and a play. Written in 1907 by Peretz Hirschbein, who was also a Jewish writer in Tsarist controlled Poland. Unlike the more secular Rapoport he had a religious upbringing and education and somewhat unusually he would not only write in Yiddish but also in Hebrew, then considered a more scholarly language rarely used for contemporary literature. Unlike the wide ranging Raporport who wrote a lot of non fiction scholarly and political activist works Hirschbein concentrated on fiction writing stories, poetry and especially plays and he founded his own theatre company which became highly influential in Eastern in promoting Yiddish theatre as having legitimate drama asidefrom the usual musicals and comedies. He also travelled through much of Europe and to the Americas where he settled in New York just before the Great War. During that war and while on a transatlantic trip the ship he was on was sunk by a German U-Boat and was captured by the Germans who dropped him off in Brazil where he managed to make his way to Hollywood, where he resumed his career. He'd live to see the end of the Third Reich dying of Lou Gehrig's disease in Los Angeles in 1948 aged 67.  

show-photo
PERETZ HIRSCHBEIN

As in "The Dybbuk" most of the cast survived the Holocaust. As mentioned Turkow ended up in America where after a respected theatre career on four continents he died in 1970. Besides casting himself in a role of Elijah he also cast his wife, Ida Kaminska, as Rachel and her screen mother would be played by her real life mother Esther-Rokhi Kaminska. Turkow and Ida would be divorced in 1932 (the year before Roland's 1933 rerelease) and she would end up having an even more successful career than her ex-husband.

Zygmunt-Turkow
ZYGMUNT TURKOW

She remarried and also fled Poland during the war, in her case to the USSR, but returned to rebuild the Yiddish theatre and acted in films earning an unusual Oscar nomination in 1967 for the Czech film "The House On Main Street". She left Eastern Europe for good after the 1968 and yet another Soviet invasion and moved to America where she became a mentor to what remained of the American Yiddish theatre in New York where she died in 1980. Her mother Esther, born in 1870, had been a respected actor in Tsarist Poland and Lithuania since the 1890's known as the Yiddish Eleanor Duse. She made a few other short films but this was her only feature film made before she died in 1925 aged only 55.

1019-232
IDA KAMINSKA

Ironically Turkow's second wife Diana Blumenfeld was also an actress who played a small role in this film which raises some eyebrows in retrospect, she died in 1961 New York. As if to make things more complicated (not to mention incestuous) Turkow also cast his younger brother Jonas as Jacob's Yeshiva school friend and Jonas would also marry Diana Blumenfeld. He ended up in Israel where he died in 1988 aged 90. At least one member of the cast, Samuel Landau, who plays a minor role here, would also appear in "The Dybbuk" a decade later. David Lederman, who plays the Matchmaker, would later appear in one of the last notable pre-war Polish Yiddish films "Kol Nidre" in 1939 and he fled to Argentina where he was still active into the 1950's.

Esther-Rokhl-Kaminska-portrait-from-Klangen-fun-mayn-lebn
ESTHER KAMINSKA

As for director George Roland, he claimed to have worked as a film editor since before the Great War although actual proof of this is spotty at best. During the 1930's he carved out a successful, if somewhat shady sideline in taking silent films, usually with Biblical themes, and re-editing them with new voiceovers and rereleasing them as educational or religious films under his own name as he had with "The Vow". While this may not have been exactly ethical, some of his versions are the only surviving copies of these films. A tireless hustler to the end he promoted himself as a director although he actually worked mostly as an editor on various unknown projects although he may have made various typically uncreditted educational and industrial short films before he died in 1961.

Herman-Ross-Jacob-Ben-Ami-and-George-Roland-1933
GEORGE ROLAND & FRIENDS

Joseph Buloff, who played the Narrator in the Roland version, would have the longest carrer in film and theatre career both in the Yiddish theatre and on television and Hollywood in such TV series as the popular sitcom "The Goldbergs", crime show "The Naked City", medical drama "Ben Casey", supernatural anthologies "Lights Out", "Suspense" and "Tales Of Tomorrow" and films "Somebody Up There Likes Me" (1956) and "Silk Stockings" (1957) and finally an appearance Warren Beatty's 1981 epic "Reds" before dying in 1985 aged 86.

download-1
JOSEPH BULOFF

If Yiddish Expressionism is indeed a film genre version of Yiddish Gothic theatre these two films may well be the only examples of it and they would certainly make for a unique Halloween/Yom Kippur double feature.

a988657eb898e9b0a8635d1a8817db46


THE DYBBUK IN WOODCUT FORM;
june-7-sq